Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Ihsan Dogan
Am 20.3.2009 0:29 Uhr, Tonnerre Lombard schrieb:

 For that it would make sense, if we would get in contact with the
 political parties. At the moment, it seems that none of the parties in
 the parliament have an opinion on this issue.
 That is of course also very important. Firstly, politicians need to be
 educated on these issues; secondly, I would also dislike it if someone
 just calls me when he needs me to vote for something he wants and then
 leaves me alone again, without building up any relationship or
 explaining his thoughts. Feels a bit like abuse, eh?

Instead of educating politicians it would make more sense, if the IT
people would be more involved in politics. The IT industry is doing more
for the GDI (BIP) than the farmers, but unfortunately we are not organized.

 Either way, the number one priority is still to submit a response to
 the proposal, then the lobbying can be #2 on the agenda.

Friday evening I was at an Apéro and I had personal contact with the FDP
Nationalrat Markus Hutter. I've spoke with him and he promised me to
bring up this topic at the Rechtskomission.





Ihsan

-- 
ih...@dogan.ch  http://blog.dogan.ch/

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Rainer Duffner
Ihsan Dogan schrieb:


 Instead of educating politicians it would make more sense, if the IT
 people would be more involved in politics. The IT industry is doing more
 for the GDI (BIP) than the farmers, but unfortunately we are not organized.

   


We also have no means to deliver kilo-gallons of slurry to the
front-door of the parliament ;-)
Also, farmers have much more means to apply pressure to the public -
it's not easy to replace their goods  services on short-notice and they
are mostly self-employed.
Our work has been commoditized to the point where we are replaceable
almost immediately - and most of us are employees. Those who are not are
replaceable even easier
And all the heavy-lifting of the infrastructure is done by big
corporations that never go on strike or deny service to their customers
(which is the usual way pressure groups like garbage-men and farmers get
their agenda through).

A part of reality is also, of course, that most of what we do is not
really essential - superfluous luxury so to speak.
People need food, water, shelter (and garbage-collection). People can
survive without email (though we work hard to convince them otherwise) ;-)


Rainer



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Silvan Gebhardt

Hi Folks,

I also thought today that even the Schools for IT should position in  
this discussion... I will try to reach the BBW Winterthur which I am a  
student of (and some apprentices of members of this mailinglist, too  
btw)

I will also try to reach the TBZ in this purpose

I think we should try to collect organisations which will work  
together, I can also speak for Gnupingu and the Lug Kreuzlingen


Silvan



Am 23.03.2009 um 17:44 schrieb Rainer Duffner:


Ihsan Dogan schrieb:



Instead of educating politicians it would make more sense, if the IT
people would be more involved in politics. The IT industry is doing  
more
for the GDI (BIP) than the farmers, but unfortunately we are not  
organized.






We also have no means to deliver kilo-gallons of slurry to the
front-door of the parliament ;-)
Also, farmers have much more means to apply pressure to the public -
it's not easy to replace their goods  services on short-notice and  
they

are mostly self-employed.
Our work has been commoditized to the point where we are replaceable
almost immediately - and most of us are employees. Those who are not  
are

replaceable even easier
And all the heavy-lifting of the infrastructure is done by big
corporations that never go on strike or deny service to their  
customers
(which is the usual way pressure groups like garbage-men and farmers  
get

their agenda through).

A part of reality is also, of course, that most of what we do is not
really essential - superfluous luxury so to speak.
People need food, water, shelter (and garbage-collection). People can
survive without email (though we work hard to convince them  
otherwise) ;-)



Rainer



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Michael Naef
On Monday 23 March 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
[..]
 People can survive without email

I am tempted to doubt that. The reactions to mail outage suggest 
the contrary ;-)

have fun,

Michi

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Rainer Duffner
Michael Naef schrieb:
 On Monday 23 March 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
 [..]
   
 People can survive without email
 

 I am tempted to doubt that. The reactions to mail outage suggest 
 the contrary ;-)

   

Well, it depends.
I survived a week without email on my holiday.
;-)
But our customers' business sort-of depends on email-availability, yes.

Can you eat/drink email?
Can you breath email?
Can you email the garbage away?
;-)

Nope, it's fully virtual.
Email's non-availability is only an issue, if you're the only one
without it.
If everybody else didn't have it, it wouldn't be such a problem.



Rainer

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Andreas Fink

On 23.03.2009, at 18:28, Rainer Duffner wrote:

 Michael Naef schrieb:
 On Monday 23 March 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
 [..]

 People can survive without email


 I am tempted to doubt that. The reactions to mail outage suggest
 the contrary ;-)



 Well, it depends.
 I survived a week without email on my holiday.
 ;-)
 But our customers' business sort-of depends on email-availability,  
 yes.

 Can you eat/drink email?
 Can you breath email?
 Can you email the garbage away?
 ;-)

 Nope, it's fully virtual.
 Email's non-availability is only an issue, if you're the only one
 without it.
 If everybody else didn't have it, it wouldn't be such a problem.


Whole industries depend on it. Without e-mail my business would be  
dead. In todays world communication is a vital issue to the service  
industry.



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Chris Meidinger

On 23.03.2009, at 21:31, Andreas Fink wrote:
 On 23.03.2009, at 18:28, Rainer Duffner wrote:
 Michael Naef schrieb:
 On Monday 23 March 2009, Rainer Duffner wrote:
 [..]
 People can survive without email

 I am tempted to doubt that. The reactions to mail outage suggest
 the contrary ;-)
 Well, it depends.
 I survived a week without email on my holiday.
 ;-)
 But our customers' business sort-of depends on email-availability,
 yes.

 Can you eat/drink email?
 Can you breath email?
 Can you email the garbage away?
 ;-)

 Nope, it's fully virtual.
 Email's non-availability is only an issue, if you're the only one
 without it.
 If everybody else didn't have it, it wouldn't be such a problem.
 Whole industries depend on it. Without e-mail my business would be
 dead. In todays world communication is a vital issue to the service
 industry.

The question I usually ask people is: If I gave you a choice between  
taking down your email-system or your PBX, what would you choose?

Everyone says to kill the phones.

I think that's a good measure of relevance.

Chris

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre LOMBARD
Salut,

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:46:12AM +0100, Ihsan Dogan wrote:
 Instead of educating politicians it would make more sense, if the IT
 people would be more involved in politics. The IT industry is doing more
 for the GDI (BIP) than the farmers, but unfortunately we are not organized.

That's maybe a good long term vision but I don't see that happen at this
precise moment.

  Either way, the number one priority is still to submit a response to
  the proposal, then the lobbying can be #2 on the agenda.
 
 Friday evening I was at an Apéro and I had personal contact with the FDP
 Nationalrat Markus Hutter. I've spoke with him and he promised me to
 bring up this topic at the Rechtskomission.

Very good! Just please ensure beforehand that he understood the issue. ;-)

Tonnerre


pgpfxrlMO40Yt.pgp
Description: PGP signature

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Fwd: Re: Hackerparagraph

2009-03-23 Diskussionsfäden Tonnerre LOMBARD
Salut,

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 11:18:08PM +0100, Patrick Tybo wrote:
About the blacklist: tcpdumd/snoop and wireshark: no way, maybe
metasploit on a gray line, mostly 0day stuff floating from irc to email
to email etc are a real problem.

Can you give me a legal guarantee that tcpdump will in no case be considered
as a hacker tool? No, you can't. It always depends on mood and understanding
of the judge in question, and potentially other factors.

Tonnerre


pgplT3ZPnN5uI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog