Re: [swinog] SwiNOG-BE82 - 1st of February 2010 @ Outback / ZH

2010-02-01 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Weible
Enjoy Today..

Thomas

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im 
Auftrag von Steven Glogger
Gesendet: Montag, 25. Januar 2010 14:12
An: swi...@swinog.ch
Betreff: [swinog] SwiNOG-BE82 - 1st of February 2010 @ Outback / ZH

hi everybody

here's the announcement for the next beer event.

the facts for the next event:
-
Date:   1st of February 2010

Time:   starting around 18.30 o'clock

Location:   @ the Outback Bahnhof Stadelhofen
http://www.outback-lodge.ch/

Already registred:  1

Registration deadline:  30.01.2010 20:00:00


-
Please register here: http://swinog.mrmouse.ch/ since we have to make
reservations, i need to know who's coming and who not. If you cannot 
attend and you're registered please inform me asap (+41 79 277 92 35).

greetings from barcelona

-steven


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Debian vs. Ubuntu

2010-02-01 Diskussionsfäden Benjamin Schlageter
Hey guys,

Thanks for all replys. As I see, every distribution has their own pros and
cons. For me I'll stay atm on debian - maybe I'll do a mixture of debian and
ubuntu - as stan said, in ubuntu are all pre-requisites done for torrus. :)

At the end, every sysadmin need to know by himself, why he uses his own
distri. ;)

/Benj


Am 31.01.10 22:13 schrieb Ihsan Dogan unter ih...@dogan.ch:

 I would say Solaris.
 
 Stable, well designed, full featured Unix with a stable API.
 
 
 
 Ihsan
 
 Am 30.01.10 21:51, schrieb Mehmet Akcin:
 I would say CentOS... ;)
 
 Stable, compatible and quick on patching critical stuff.. I have never
 trusted Ubuntu on my servers maybe its because of the great with
 desktops etc..
 
 Never been a fan of debian..
 
 
 
 On Jan 30, 2010, at 15:45, Peter Keel seeg...@discordia.ch wrote:
 
 * on the Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 01:36:52PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
 AFAICT from that list, you'd be fine on openSUSE too.  Still, nothing
 wrong with untar+config+make :-)
 
 Yes, very wrong. Maintainability goes trough the floor. Or are you
 sure
 not to miss a security-relevant update in an insignificant program
 like
 tar? Or any other program or library which might be a dependancy of
 the
 software you're compiling?
 
 And if you're compiling yourself, because the package in the
 distribution
 is too outdated, make packages, and name them after the same scheme
 as the
 distribution. That way your package might be upgraded automatically
 if the
 distribution ships a newer one.
 
 Cheers
 Seegras
 -- 
 Those who give up essential liberties for temporary safety deserve
 neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin
 It's also true that those who would give up privacy for security are
 likely to end up with neither. -- Bruce Schneier
 
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 
 
 ___
 swinog mailing list
 swinog@lists.swinog.ch
 http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
 



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] looking for Telco Rack 600*300

2010-02-01 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Weible
 I'm looking for Telco rack which fits the space 600*300 (frame is ok, 
 no doors required) - please contact me offlist, if you have a spare 
 one in your storage. Would pay in beer ...


IKEA has plenty ;-)

http://wiki.eth-0.nl/index.php/LackRack

- this will be the first time for me visiting IKEA! Damn good and handy
idea. Thanks for the hint.
Thomas



___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] dirt cheap netbook at Mediamarkt

2010-02-01 Diskussionsfäden Steven Glogger



If it runs Snow Leopard, this would rock! Does anybody know?
(I don't have much experience in running Mac OS on Atoms, so my 
question may be totally newbish ;)


as far as I remember, atom support has been removed in last leopard updates.
but someone made it to put it manually back...

-steven


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Debian vs. Ubuntu

2010-02-01 Diskussionsfäden Daniel G. Kluge

Am 28.01.2010 um 17:08 schrieb Mauro Calderara:

 Hi
 
 Thanks for the info.
 
 Just running normal ISP services like dhcp, dns, webserver and so on.
 Main focus is the long support, maybe I'll wait for 10.04 LTS - so I got
 support to the year 2015 :)
 
 If you are going to pick Ubuntu because of the more predictable and long-term 
 support[1], make sure the packages you need are in the repository 'main' and 
 not in 'universe'. If you have to use packages from universe, I'd be careful. 
 They do not have official security support for the same time but are 
 'supported by the community'. I've seen very sad states of packages in Ubuntu 
 'universe', there were even known broken kernels released in 'universe'. 
 'Main' is generally very nice, though.
 

I think this is the most important thing to consider. I have an LTS Version of 
Ubuntu something or other running (How does one get the version out of this 
thing, certainly not with uname(1)), actually it is 6.06.1 LTS aka dapper. 

Almost all of the things which I use on this box (Web, Mail, FTP Server) is not 
in main, but in universe, and might get updated and might not. Stuff like 
clamav, postfix, amavisd-new, pure-ftpd and loads of other goodies are in 
universe.

 On Debian all packages are officially supported equally good or bad by the 
 security team, but generally for a shorter time.
 
 Long story short:
 
 If you can cover your needs with Ubuntu 'main', go for Ubuntu. If not, I'd 
 rather use Debian.
 

Definitively true, I ended up getting debian packages for clamav, patching 
them, and then compiling them, since there was no up-to-date clamav on Ubuntu.

 You can check in what repository a given package is by searching for it on 
 http://packages.ubuntu.com
 
 Just my 5 cents
 

I think you are selling your experience short.

Cheers,
-daniel (New year's resolution: update the ubuntu box and change its IP 
Addresses, if any spare time is to be found somewhere, update it to freebsd) 




___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog


Re: [swinog] Functional Tests - only Nagios?

2010-02-01 Diskussionsfäden lists

There is another solution which is based on Nagios (Linux distribution):
http://fannagioscd.sourceforge.net/
Nagios + Centreon + Nagvis + Nareto

Cheers

Luc

Beat Siegenthaler a écrit :

On 28.01.10 13:12, Luca Cappiello wrote:



Nagios would be probably the best choice, but
maybe there other concepts I'm not aware of.


   
If You mention NAGIOS, you should look at http://www.icinga.org/ which 
is a fork of NAGIOS. Real Programmers are saying, that NAGIOS is a 
code nightmare and more or less a one man show of Ethan Galstad.  I 
run NAGIOS myself for Years. Also for easier configuration of Nagios 
the Groundwork Stuff is Real (SCNR) 
http://www.groundworkopensource.com/


Beat


___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog




___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog