looks like there needs to be a new poll, because this one is broken. I
was also going to say "no", because the question looked like it was
asking about on-site meeting only.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 1:42 PM Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
> On 2020-07-06 12:13, Steven Glogger wrote:
> > Hi community
> >
> > We’re currently in discussion if we will proceed with our SwiNOG #27
> > plans or if not…
> > We would like to get your opinion.
> > Please help us and provide an honest answer to our really short
> > questinaire (will take 30sec to fill in):
> > http://swinog.ch/covid/
>
>
> People be aware:
>
> If you select "no" on the first page ("Would you like to have a..."),
> then you do not get to chose the multi selector which has more useful
> options:
>
> - Remote: Join only if there is an remote / online session
> - On-Site: Join personally on site I would not join online nor remote -
> - I'll just watch the presentations and videos late…
> - I am ok for on-site if COVID infection rates drop by this tim…
> - Join Onsite, no live stream (otherwise less ppl attend,) if i…
>
>
> I think most people would have selected on of those options if they
> could: 70% said 'no' now and did not get to be represented in the second
> chart which skews the results quite a bit.
>
> Also, keep that in mind when looking at the chart: 33 responses no,
> while 10 of those could fill in the second chart, 23 did not get to see it.
>
>
> I am good with remote session (though I tend to then just watch the ones
> I am directly interested in to allow for questions/feedback, and watch
> the rest at a later point).
>
> Greets,
> Jeroen
>
>
>
> ___
> swinog mailing list
> swinog@lists.swinog.ch
> http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
--
Stanislav Sinyagin
Senior Consultant, CCIE #5478
ssinya...@k-open.com
+41 79 407 0224
___
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog