[swinog] Sporadic DNS resolver error for *.mail.protection.outlook.com
Hi, we see sporadic DNS resolver errors for A records of *.mail.protection.outlook.com Only a few per day vs many successful lookups. Anybody else seeing these? Kind regards Ralf Ralf Zenklusen Dipl. El. Ing. HTL Leiter Internet BAR Informatik AG Weidenweg 235 3902 Brig-Glis Tel +41 27 922 48 48 www.barinformatik.ch www.rhone.ch r.zenklu...@barinformatik.ch ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] FortiVM feedback
Hi Antoine, the main difference between Fortinet HW and VM is the HW :-) They use special ASIC's to accelerate pure firewall traffic, VPN, SSL, they have an inbuild switch fabric etc. In reality this means VM versions are good if you use mainly UTM (Antivirus, Antispam, Intrusion Protection etc), but they are not as good if you're mainly using pure firewalling, VPN, SSL or even many ports etc. They support virtualization and that means you can have several separate customers each with their own login, rights, max usage configuration on one unit. I'll send you some more info off list. Regards Ralf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im Auftrag von Antoine Benkemoun-Andre Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. April 2015 09:49 An: Jeroen Massar; swinog@lists.swinog.ch Betreff: Re: [swinog] FortiVM feedback Ok, I think this discussion is drifting a little bit. I understand your point and I find the thought process interesting. If you wish to continue this conversation, we can always do so off-list or around a beer in Lausanne. Maybe my initial request was ambiguous so I will attempt to clarify it. The question we’re asking here is : Out of the people who have tried FortiVM solution, do you have feedback to share and have you encountered any limitations or problems with it ? Antoine On 23/04/15 09:37, "Jeroen Massar" wrote: >On 2015-04-23 09:32, Antoine Benkemoun-Andre wrote: >> That’s a very good remark :) >> >> As I mentioned previously, we’re presently fully standardised on >>their appliances (physical so far) and have no particular complaints >>about it so we see no reason why we should not continue this way. In >>our opinion, standardisation has quite a lot of value. > >You are talking about mono-culture and vendor lock-in. >Those have little to do with standardization. > >Also note that from a perspective of most admins, mono-culture is bad, >as that means if one thing is broken, everything is broken, while >diversity would mean that a bug might not affect all things. > >On the flip-side though, having only one thing to support does mean >less overhead; and if you are thinking about "cloud" firewalls, well, >nothing much can be helped there IMHO... > >Without requirements (which could include "team is 1 person big, hence, >not going to bother with multiple things" or "we have zero budget" or >"management already decided" ;) little anybody can say if something is >good or bad though. > >Greets, > Jeroen > > > >___ >swinog mailing list >swinog@lists.swinog.ch >http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] Suche nach neuem Registrar
Thank you for pointing that out - maybe for somebody VS was so far away as AU ;-) There's still some time for the change... We'll support DNSSEC shortly and I'm sure others are working on additional features as well. Changes are never simple. Regards Ralf -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im Auftrag von Beat Siegenthaler Gesendet: Freitag, 23. Januar 2015 21:39 An: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Betreff: Re: [swinog] Suche nach neuem Registrar On 23.01.15 15:47, Oli Schacher wrote: > there is a (incomplete/possibly inaccurate) community generated list > here: > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UWK6ijLCiLXSIuTT4sS_h0zCqPMCjj > hry0byQprysts/edit?usp=sharing Hi, Wow, the "where" row seems to be very inaccurate, or there are some explanations needed. Amazon, Switchplus, Metanet are really located in Austria? And Brig (rhone.ch) is now located in Australia? :-) And many "CH" registrars: I am pretty sure they have no business in Switzerland... I know i am on the wrong place here for this, but i want simply the same "swissness service" i had from switch. With IPv6 glue and DNSSEC. With a fair price...;-) Beat ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] datacenter in Visp, Brig (VS) ?
Hi Stanislav, we have a datacenter in Brig www.colobrig.ch Please contact me offlist.. Kind regards Ralf Zenklusen -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im Auftrag von Stanislav S Grinkin Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Januar 2015 21:36 An: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Betreff: [swinog] datacenter in Visp, Brig (VS) ? Hi all, I seek datacenter in Visp or Brig (VS) to place one 19" 42U rack. We need up to 6kwa and about 1GE internet connection. If somebody knows it, pls contact with me. Thank you. -- Best regards, Stanislav S Grinkin ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
Re: [swinog] .ch registrars : goodbye nic.ch, but where to go then ?
Well not sure how up-to-date that info is... We'll support it shortly. If you have many domains or special wishes e.g. regarding prices, you should ask. This is surly true for many companies on the list. Yes, there's now a competition and a large list of partners. Good luck in finding the right one for you ;-) Regards Ralf http://www.rhone.ch http://www.barinformatik.ch http://www.colobrig.ch http://www.finishweb.ch BAR Informatik AG Gliserallee 16 3902 Brig-Glis Switzerland r...@bar.ch -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [mailto:swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch] Im Auftrag von Michael Richter Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 14:09 An: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Betreff: Re: [swinog] .ch registrars : goodbye nic.ch, but where to go then ? Switch answered me these three will support DNSSEC: Gandi.net OVH.com 123 domain.eu Freundliche Grüsse sasag Kabelkommunikation AG Michael Richter Professional Bachelor ODEC in Engineering mrich...@sasag.ch 052 633 01 71 Von: Silvan M. Gebhardt / Силван Гебхардт [gebha...@openfactory.ch] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 13:58 An: Michael Richter Cc: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Betreff: Re: [swinog] .ch registrars : goodbye nic.ch, but where to go then ? Since you asked, I asked back since I gave a statement last week. Amenic will support DNSSEC by New Year ;) (I just poked them now again) Silvan - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Michael Richter" An: swinog@lists.swinog.ch Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. November 2014 08:04:01 Betreff: Re: [swinog] .ch registrars : goodbye nic.ch, but where to go then ? Does anyone knows which one of the list supports DNSSEC? Freundliche Grüsse sasag Kabelkommunikation AG Michael Richter Professional Bachelor ODEC in Engineering mrich...@sasag.ch 052 633 01 71 Von: swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch [swinog-boun...@lists.swinog.ch]" im Auftrag von "Thomas Hug [t...@nine.ch] Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. November 2014 21:32 An: swi...@swinog.ch Betreff: Re: [swinog] .ch registrars : goodbye nic.ch, but where to go then ? On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 20:37, Stanislav Sinyagin wrote: > Cool, thanks for the list. Does any of those registrars allow a 5-year > payment? Because it's quite annoying to handle those little invoices > every year. You can pay 100.- or 200.- instead of the one year price! At cyon this works and it worked also for the good old nic.ch. You will get 0.00 bills until your credit is used up. -Tom ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] No http://www.swisscom.ch from one specific source ip?
Hi, a customer can’t get http://www.swisscom.ch from one of his ip addresses. Does anybody know if Swisscom is using ip filters? Could anybody from Swisscom contact me directly? Thank you Ralf Zenklusen <http://www.rhone.ch> http://www.rhone.ch <http://www.colobrig.ch> http://www.colobrig.ch <http://www.finishweb.ch> http://www.finishweb.ch BAR Informatik AG Gliserallee 16 3902 Brig-Glis Switzerland <mailto:r...@bar.ch> r...@bar.ch ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
[swinog] SWINOG Position Paper
Will SWINOG write a position paper concerning: "Bericht und Vorentwürfe über die Änderung des Schweizerischen Strafgesetzbuches und des Militärstrafgesetzes betreffend die strafrechtliche Verantworltichkeit der Provider und die Kompetenzen des Bundes bei der Verfolgung strafbarer Handlungen mittels elektronischer Kommunikationsnetze" www.ofj.admin.ch/themen/netzwerkkrim/vn-ber-d.pdf www.ofj.admin.ch/themen/netzwerkkrim/ber-netzwerkkrim-d.pdf www.ofj.admin.ch/themen/netzwerkkrim/ber-genesis-d.pdf Regards Ralf ___ swinog mailing list swinog@lists.swinog.ch http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog
