[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genete You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Pending Resolution: Remind Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-07-27 22:33 Message: Remind to test this bug in the next release. -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 17:36 Message: If it is as you say that you can't find the issue in any revision you've tried then I'll live with it for now and keep my fingers crossed for the bug to magically dissapear next time I upgrade Synfig. (In the middle of an production so I don't want to risk anything by upgrading now) I'll get back to this report when I've upgraded. -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:58 Message: That's possible a correct one because the extra info is optional. I wonder how can I reproduce the bug... -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:47 Message: Hmmm, that's an old about dialog before the one of the 0.61.09 release. See the correct one posted. -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:38 Message: I've tried to reproduce the bug at the following revisions: 2130, 2140, 2150, 2160, 2170, 2180, 2190 and 2200 with no success. Release for 0.61.09 was revision 2128 Continue testing :) -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 16:34 Message: The About dialog doesn't have any revision info. Posting it anyway. synfig --info gives; synfig-0.61.09 Compiled on Nov 23 2008 with GCC 4.3.2 Copyright (c) 2001-2005 Robert B. Quattlebaum Jr., Adrian Bentley File Added: about_synfig.png -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:26 Message: I meant to say 2320 :) -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:24 Message: I have several binaries compiled from different revisions since revision 1200 to 2032. To allow me to hook the bug maybe you can paste the about dialog. There should be the revision number against that installed version was built. As far as I've seen in the sources you have posted, the revision doesn't correspond to exactly the 0.61.09 release but a little later. Meanwhile you post the about dialog I'll try to reproduce it in my old binaries. I confirm that in the latest svn revision it doesn't happen. -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 08:54 Message: There's nonthing special I'm doing to get this. As I wrote in my last comment I get this by just starting up a new project and setting it's frame length to a few hundred frames. Here's some specs that might help in pinpointing this bug; Ubuntu Studio 8.10, 64 bit on a Dell Precision 490. 4Gb of RAM, dual core Xeon. 2.6.27-11-generic kernel. Synfig Studio 0.61.09, installed by adding deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/stemp/ubuntu intrepid main to my sources. I also tested on my laptop, an old Sony Vaio with Ubuntu 8.10 with Synfig installed in the same way as above and I get the same behavior there. [A short note on the scene attached. It's part of an fuzzy cloud effect for an animated short. After animating the gradient in Synfig I process the images with a photoshop filter and imports the sequence into Moho which we do the main animation in. But I do have plans for a all Synfig short film later on. Thanks for the project size note, never crossed my mind, I'm all too used to working with pixel graphics.] -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 00:37 Message: I don't find a way to reproduce it with your sample file. Should I do something special apart
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genete You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:24 Message: I have several binaries compiled from different revisions since revision 1200 to 2032. To allow me to hook the bug maybe you can paste the about dialog. There should be the revision number against that installed version was built. As far as I've seen in the sources you have posted, the revision doesn't correspond to exactly the 0.61.09 release but a little later. Meanwhile you post the about dialog I'll try to reproduce it in my old binaries. I confirm that in the latest svn revision it doesn't happen. -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 08:54 Message: There's nonthing special I'm doing to get this. As I wrote in my last comment I get this by just starting up a new project and setting it's frame length to a few hundred frames. Here's some specs that might help in pinpointing this bug; Ubuntu Studio 8.10, 64 bit on a Dell Precision 490. 4Gb of RAM, dual core Xeon. 2.6.27-11-generic kernel. Synfig Studio 0.61.09, installed by adding deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/stemp/ubuntu intrepid main to my sources. I also tested on my laptop, an old Sony Vaio with Ubuntu 8.10 with Synfig installed in the same way as above and I get the same behavior there. [A short note on the scene attached. It's part of an fuzzy cloud effect for an animated short. After animating the gradient in Synfig I process the images with a photoshop filter and imports the sequence into Moho which we do the main animation in. But I do have plans for a all Synfig short film later on. Thanks for the project size note, never crossed my mind, I'm all too used to working with pixel graphics.] -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 00:37 Message: I don't find a way to reproduce it with your sample file. Should I do something special apart of set the time cursor in a proper frame? BTW, it is not needed you work with a 1920x1080 pixel canvas in production. Just use a image size with the same aspect ratio than the final output. Only when do the final render you should set it to the high resolution. I wonder what's the animation about :) -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-12 22:33 Message: Alright, I'm attaching the scene in which I got the huge difference. It does have an image sequence imported which I won't attach so I hope it will work anyway. I just did a quick test with starting a new scene, 1920x1080, 25fps and set the length to 500fr. and towards the end I get about 20fr. difference. File Added: sc28_fuzz.1.1.sifz -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-12 22:11 Message: Can you provide a sample file? Or maybe a step by step recipe. I've never seen that huge error before. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com ___ Synfig-devl mailing list Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genete You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:26 Message: I meant to say 2320 :) -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:24 Message: I have several binaries compiled from different revisions since revision 1200 to 2032. To allow me to hook the bug maybe you can paste the about dialog. There should be the revision number against that installed version was built. As far as I've seen in the sources you have posted, the revision doesn't correspond to exactly the 0.61.09 release but a little later. Meanwhile you post the about dialog I'll try to reproduce it in my old binaries. I confirm that in the latest svn revision it doesn't happen. -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 08:54 Message: There's nonthing special I'm doing to get this. As I wrote in my last comment I get this by just starting up a new project and setting it's frame length to a few hundred frames. Here's some specs that might help in pinpointing this bug; Ubuntu Studio 8.10, 64 bit on a Dell Precision 490. 4Gb of RAM, dual core Xeon. 2.6.27-11-generic kernel. Synfig Studio 0.61.09, installed by adding deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/stemp/ubuntu intrepid main to my sources. I also tested on my laptop, an old Sony Vaio with Ubuntu 8.10 with Synfig installed in the same way as above and I get the same behavior there. [A short note on the scene attached. It's part of an fuzzy cloud effect for an animated short. After animating the gradient in Synfig I process the images with a photoshop filter and imports the sequence into Moho which we do the main animation in. But I do have plans for a all Synfig short film later on. Thanks for the project size note, never crossed my mind, I'm all too used to working with pixel graphics.] -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 00:37 Message: I don't find a way to reproduce it with your sample file. Should I do something special apart of set the time cursor in a proper frame? BTW, it is not needed you work with a 1920x1080 pixel canvas in production. Just use a image size with the same aspect ratio than the final output. Only when do the final render you should set it to the high resolution. I wonder what's the animation about :) -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-12 22:33 Message: Alright, I'm attaching the scene in which I got the huge difference. It does have an image sequence imported which I won't attach so I hope it will work anyway. I just did a quick test with starting a new scene, 1920x1080, 25fps and set the length to 500fr. and towards the end I get about 20fr. difference. File Added: sc28_fuzz.1.1.sifz -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-12 22:11 Message: Can you provide a sample file? Or maybe a step by step recipe. I've never seen that huge error before. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com ___ Synfig-devl mailing list Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rylleman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 16:34 Message: The About dialog doesn't have any revision info. Posting it anyway. synfig --info gives; synfig-0.61.09 Compiled on Nov 23 2008 with GCC 4.3.2 Copyright (c) 2001-2005 Robert B. Quattlebaum Jr., Adrian Bentley File Added: about_synfig.png -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:26 Message: I meant to say 2320 :) -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:24 Message: I have several binaries compiled from different revisions since revision 1200 to 2032. To allow me to hook the bug maybe you can paste the about dialog. There should be the revision number against that installed version was built. As far as I've seen in the sources you have posted, the revision doesn't correspond to exactly the 0.61.09 release but a little later. Meanwhile you post the about dialog I'll try to reproduce it in my old binaries. I confirm that in the latest svn revision it doesn't happen. -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 08:54 Message: There's nonthing special I'm doing to get this. As I wrote in my last comment I get this by just starting up a new project and setting it's frame length to a few hundred frames. Here's some specs that might help in pinpointing this bug; Ubuntu Studio 8.10, 64 bit on a Dell Precision 490. 4Gb of RAM, dual core Xeon. 2.6.27-11-generic kernel. Synfig Studio 0.61.09, installed by adding deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/stemp/ubuntu intrepid main to my sources. I also tested on my laptop, an old Sony Vaio with Ubuntu 8.10 with Synfig installed in the same way as above and I get the same behavior there. [A short note on the scene attached. It's part of an fuzzy cloud effect for an animated short. After animating the gradient in Synfig I process the images with a photoshop filter and imports the sequence into Moho which we do the main animation in. But I do have plans for a all Synfig short film later on. Thanks for the project size note, never crossed my mind, I'm all too used to working with pixel graphics.] -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 00:37 Message: I don't find a way to reproduce it with your sample file. Should I do something special apart of set the time cursor in a proper frame? BTW, it is not needed you work with a 1920x1080 pixel canvas in production. Just use a image size with the same aspect ratio than the final output. Only when do the final render you should set it to the high resolution. I wonder what's the animation about :) -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-12 22:33 Message: Alright, I'm attaching the scene in which I got the huge difference. It does have an image sequence imported which I won't attach so I hope it will work anyway. I just did a quick test with starting a new scene, 1920x1080, 25fps and set the length to 500fr. and towards the end I get about 20fr. difference. File Added: sc28_fuzz.1.1.sifz -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-12 22:11 Message: Can you provide a sample file? Or maybe a step by step recipe. I've never seen that huge error before. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genete You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:38 Message: I've tried to reproduce the bug at the following revisions: 2130, 2140, 2150, 2160, 2170, 2180, 2190 and 2200 with no success. Release for 0.61.09 was revision 2128 Continue testing :) -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 16:34 Message: The About dialog doesn't have any revision info. Posting it anyway. synfig --info gives; synfig-0.61.09 Compiled on Nov 23 2008 with GCC 4.3.2 Copyright (c) 2001-2005 Robert B. Quattlebaum Jr., Adrian Bentley File Added: about_synfig.png -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:26 Message: I meant to say 2320 :) -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 16:24 Message: I have several binaries compiled from different revisions since revision 1200 to 2032. To allow me to hook the bug maybe you can paste the about dialog. There should be the revision number against that installed version was built. As far as I've seen in the sources you have posted, the revision doesn't correspond to exactly the 0.61.09 release but a little later. Meanwhile you post the about dialog I'll try to reproduce it in my old binaries. I confirm that in the latest svn revision it doesn't happen. -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-13 08:54 Message: There's nonthing special I'm doing to get this. As I wrote in my last comment I get this by just starting up a new project and setting it's frame length to a few hundred frames. Here's some specs that might help in pinpointing this bug; Ubuntu Studio 8.10, 64 bit on a Dell Precision 490. 4Gb of RAM, dual core Xeon. 2.6.27-11-generic kernel. Synfig Studio 0.61.09, installed by adding deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/stemp/ubuntu intrepid main to my sources. I also tested on my laptop, an old Sony Vaio with Ubuntu 8.10 with Synfig installed in the same way as above and I get the same behavior there. [A short note on the scene attached. It's part of an fuzzy cloud effect for an animated short. After animating the gradient in Synfig I process the images with a photoshop filter and imports the sequence into Moho which we do the main animation in. But I do have plans for a all Synfig short film later on. Thanks for the project size note, never crossed my mind, I'm all too used to working with pixel graphics.] -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-13 00:37 Message: I don't find a way to reproduce it with your sample file. Should I do something special apart of set the time cursor in a proper frame? BTW, it is not needed you work with a 1920x1080 pixel canvas in production. Just use a image size with the same aspect ratio than the final output. Only when do the final render you should set it to the high resolution. I wonder what's the animation about :) -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-12 22:33 Message: Alright, I'm attaching the scene in which I got the huge difference. It does have an image sequence imported which I won't attach so I hope it will work anyway. I just did a quick test with starting a new scene, 1920x1080, 25fps and set the length to 500fr. and towards the end I get about 20fr. difference. File Added: sc28_fuzz.1.1.sifz -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-12 22:11 Message: Can you provide a sample file? Or maybe a step by step recipe. I've never seen that huge error before. -- You can respond by visiting:
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com ___ Synfig-devl mailing list Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by genete You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-12 22:11 Message: Can you provide a sample file? Or maybe a step by step recipe. I've never seen that huge error before. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com ___ Synfig-devl mailing list Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-2685228 ] Timeline frame numbering inaccurate
Bugs item #2685228, was opened at 2009-03-12 15:51 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by rylleman You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Usability Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: David Rylander (rylleman) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Timeline frame numbering inaccurate Initial Comment: The frame numbers indicated above the timeline is not accurate. Looking at the timeline in my attached image, it looks like I'm at frame 336 but I am in fact at frame 350 which is properly indicated in the main window seen above (and to further confirm the imported image sequence has a frame count rendered into it, saying frame 350). -- Comment By: David Rylander (rylleman) Date: 2009-03-12 22:33 Message: Alright, I'm attaching the scene in which I got the huge difference. It does have an image sequence imported which I won't attach so I hope it will work anyway. I just did a quick test with starting a new scene, 1920x1080, 25fps and set the length to 500fr. and towards the end I get about 20fr. difference. File Added: sc28_fuzz.1.1.sifz -- Comment By: Genete (genete) Date: 2009-03-12 22:11 Message: Can you provide a sample file? Or maybe a step by step recipe. I've never seen that huge error before. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=757416aid=2685228group_id=144022 -- Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com ___ Synfig-devl mailing list Synfig-devl@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synfig-devl
