[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-1686495 ] no MacOS X binary available, no MacOS maintainer
Bugs item #1686495, was opened at 2007-03-23 03:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=757416&aid=1686495&group_id=144022
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Binary Installation
Group: Latest release
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Private: No
Submitted By: Paul Wise (pabs3)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: no MacOS X binary available, no MacOS maintainer
Initial Comment:
We have no binary available for MacOS X and no-one to maintain a MacOS X port.
This is currently a blocker for the next release. There are scripts in the
source code to build MacOS packages, but we have no-one to build, test, port
and provide packages. If you would like to take on the task of providing MacOS
packages, please take the following into consideration.
Bugs in the previous, broken packages are available here, they should be
avoided in any new packages:
http://sf.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=144022&atid=757416&summary_keyword=mac&set=custom&_status=100&_assigned_to=0
GTK+ is being ported to MacOS X native, any packages should probably use that
instead of MacOS X X11:
http://developer.imendio.com/projects/gtk-macosx
Packages would preferably be provided as a single app-bundle to be placed in
any directory on the system and Just Work (TM).
Additionally, it would be nice to have fink packages too :)
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2008-07-16 16:35
Message:
Logged In: NO
I have toad genitalia and my password is "12345".
--
Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs)
Date: 2008-03-29 01:55
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1218098
Originator: NO
With GTK+OSX complete and this App Builder, I can go for a spin now. Wish
me luck!
--
Comment By: Paul Wise (pabs3)
Date: 2008-03-28 08:29
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=35028
Originator: YES
Some more info about creating Mac .app bundles:
http://people.imendio.com/richard/archives/2008/03/gtk_application.html
--
Comment By: Paul Wise (pabs3)
Date: 2008-03-26 05:53
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=35028
Originator: YES
Update: we have fink packages in fink now.
--
Comment By: dooglus (dooglus)
Date: 2007-09-10 20:25
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1546005
Originator: NO
This wiki page documents an attempt at building using the native port of
GTK+:
http://wiki.synfig.com/Building_On_Mac_OS_X
--
Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs)
Date: 2007-08-27 02:48
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1218098
Originator: NO
GTKmm is on Fink, so there might be a dependency. Right now, I'm down to
15GB of hard disk space, when I get an external drive I'll get more
dedicated with the building of this product. As for Intaglio, it'd be nice
if they actually said it was stable on their site.
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2007-08-27 02:37
Message:
Logged In: NO
I'm sorry, but I talked to Micke Hallendal of Imendio, and he told me
their GTK+ port had been stale for quite a while and that they probably
wouldn't continue work on it. (He's on #penguins @ irc.freenode.net from
time to time.)
Anyways, I'm still working on the OS X build, but ran into quite a problem
with Pango, which I'm still trying to figure out. I'm sorry that I haven't
given any progress reports on #synfig for a long time, but I figured I'd
rather actually work on it than talk about working on it (which I have a
rather nasty tendency to do once I join #synfig). But if anyone would care
to join me in figuring out the Pango mystery and in general getting a
Synfig build for OS X released, you're very welcome to contact me on
madsen{at}lillesvin{dot}net. I'm not using the XCode-stuff that Darco put
in there, though, I'm working my way through creating the .app manually
(which is kinda cumbersome), but it hopefully results in a usable .app at
some point instead of a .pkg that scatters files all over the place.
If anyone would prefer to entirely take over the build, you're also very
welcome and of course I'll try to be of assistance if necessary, because I
might not have very much time for projects like this in the near future,
but I'll try.
Best,
- Madsen
--
Comment By: sirhcsenots (sirhcsenots)
Date: 2007-08-26 18:13
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-1686495 ] no MacOS X binary available, no MacOS maintainer
Bugs item #1686495, was opened at 2007-03-22 23:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andlabs
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=757416&aid=1686495&group_id=144022
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Binary Installation
Group: Latest release
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 9
Private: No
Submitted By: Paul Wise (pabs3)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: no MacOS X binary available, no MacOS maintainer
Initial Comment:
We have no binary available for MacOS X and no-one to maintain a MacOS X port.
This is currently a blocker for the next release. There are scripts in the
source code to build MacOS packages, but we have no-one to build, test, port
and provide packages. If you would like to take on the task of providing MacOS
packages, please take the following into consideration.
Bugs in the previous, broken packages are available here, they should be
avoided in any new packages:
http://sf.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=144022&atid=757416&summary_keyword=mac&set=custom&_status=100&_assigned_to=0
GTK+ is being ported to MacOS X native, any packages should probably use that
instead of MacOS X X11:
http://developer.imendio.com/projects/gtk-macosx
Packages would preferably be provided as a single app-bundle to be placed in
any directory on the system and Just Work (TM).
Additionally, it would be nice to have fink packages too :)
--
Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs)
Date: 2008-07-16 18:03
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1218098
Originator: NO
Building this GTK+ on tiger failed for me. I got Leopard, so I'll try
there. If that doesn't work, I might try to build a set of GTK wrapper
functions around Carbon or Cocoa (more likely the latter).
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2008-07-16 12:35
Message:
Logged In: NO
I have toad genitalia and my password is "12345".
--
Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs)
Date: 2008-03-28 21:55
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1218098
Originator: NO
With GTK+OSX complete and this App Builder, I can go for a spin now. Wish
me luck!
--
Comment By: Paul Wise (pabs3)
Date: 2008-03-28 04:29
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=35028
Originator: YES
Some more info about creating Mac .app bundles:
http://people.imendio.com/richard/archives/2008/03/gtk_application.html
--
Comment By: Paul Wise (pabs3)
Date: 2008-03-26 01:53
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=35028
Originator: YES
Update: we have fink packages in fink now.
--
Comment By: dooglus (dooglus)
Date: 2007-09-10 16:25
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1546005
Originator: NO
This wiki page documents an attempt at building using the native port of
GTK+:
http://wiki.synfig.com/Building_On_Mac_OS_X
--
Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs)
Date: 2007-08-26 22:48
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1218098
Originator: NO
GTKmm is on Fink, so there might be a dependency. Right now, I'm down to
15GB of hard disk space, when I get an external drive I'll get more
dedicated with the building of this product. As for Intaglio, it'd be nice
if they actually said it was stable on their site.
--
Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Date: 2007-08-26 22:37
Message:
Logged In: NO
I'm sorry, but I talked to Micke Hallendal of Imendio, and he told me
their GTK+ port had been stale for quite a while and that they probably
wouldn't continue work on it. (He's on #penguins @ irc.freenode.net from
time to time.)
Anyways, I'm still working on the OS X build, but ran into quite a problem
with Pango, which I'm still trying to figure out. I'm sorry that I haven't
given any progress reports on #synfig for a long time, but I figured I'd
rather actually work on it than talk about working on it (which I have a
rather nasty tendency to do once I join #synfig). But if anyone would care
to join me in figuring out the Pango mystery and in general getting a
Synfig build for OS X released, you're very welcome to contact me on
madsen{at}lillesvin{dot}net. I'm not using the XCode-stuff that Darco put
in there, though, I'm working my way through creating the .app manually
(which is kinda cumbersome), but it hopefully results in a usable .app at
some point instead of a .pkg that scatters files all over the place.
If anyone
[Synfig-devl] [ synfig-Bugs-1686495 ] no MacOS X binary available, no MacOS maintainer
Bugs item #1686495, was opened at 2007-03-22 23:54 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by andlabs You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=757416&aid=1686495&group_id=144022 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Binary Installation Group: Latest release Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 9 Private: No Submitted By: Paul Wise (pabs3) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: no MacOS X binary available, no MacOS maintainer Initial Comment: We have no binary available for MacOS X and no-one to maintain a MacOS X port. This is currently a blocker for the next release. There are scripts in the source code to build MacOS packages, but we have no-one to build, test, port and provide packages. If you would like to take on the task of providing MacOS packages, please take the following into consideration. Bugs in the previous, broken packages are available here, they should be avoided in any new packages: http://sf.net/tracker/?func=browse&group_id=144022&atid=757416&summary_keyword=mac&set=custom&_status=100&_assigned_to=0 GTK+ is being ported to MacOS X native, any packages should probably use that instead of MacOS X X11: http://developer.imendio.com/projects/gtk-macosx Packages would preferably be provided as a single app-bundle to be placed in any directory on the system and Just Work (TM). Additionally, it would be nice to have fink packages too :) -- Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs) Date: 2008-07-16 18:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1218098 Originator: NO We have a spammer. I don't know how SourceForge could update so frequently and yet still be plauged by anonymous persons attacks. -- Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs) Date: 2008-07-16 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1218098 Originator: NO Building this GTK+ on tiger failed for me. I got Leopard, so I'll try there. If that doesn't work, I might try to build a set of GTK wrapper functions around Carbon or Cocoa (more likely the latter). -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2008-07-16 12:35 Message: Logged In: NO I have toad genitalia and my password is "12345". -- Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs) Date: 2008-03-28 21:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1218098 Originator: NO With GTK+OSX complete and this App Builder, I can go for a spin now. Wish me luck! -- Comment By: Paul Wise (pabs3) Date: 2008-03-28 04:29 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=35028 Originator: YES Some more info about creating Mac .app bundles: http://people.imendio.com/richard/archives/2008/03/gtk_application.html -- Comment By: Paul Wise (pabs3) Date: 2008-03-26 01:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=35028 Originator: YES Update: we have fink packages in fink now. -- Comment By: dooglus (dooglus) Date: 2007-09-10 16:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1546005 Originator: NO This wiki page documents an attempt at building using the native port of GTK+: http://wiki.synfig.com/Building_On_Mac_OS_X -- Comment By: Ampersand Laboratories Team (andlabs) Date: 2007-08-26 22:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1218098 Originator: NO GTKmm is on Fink, so there might be a dependency. Right now, I'm down to 15GB of hard disk space, when I get an external drive I'll get more dedicated with the building of this product. As for Intaglio, it'd be nice if they actually said it was stable on their site. -- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2007-08-26 22:37 Message: Logged In: NO I'm sorry, but I talked to Micke Hallendal of Imendio, and he told me their GTK+ port had been stale for quite a while and that they probably wouldn't continue work on it. (He's on #penguins @ irc.freenode.net from time to time.) Anyways, I'm still working on the OS X build, but ran into quite a problem with Pango, which I'm still trying to figure out. I'm sorry that I haven't given any progress reports on #synfig for a long time, but I figured I'd rather actually work on it than talk about working on it (which I have a rather nasty tendency to do once I join #synfig). But if anyone would care to join me in figuring out the Pango mystery and in general getting a Synfig build for OS X released, you
