Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] systemd v30
Hi, what I've read is great, about session support and multiseat. In my opinion the managment of seats and sessions always could be much better, and your work looks good. Futher it's smart to assign a usb hub to a certain seat and let all devices connected be part of the same seat. In practice this is how it goes, just plugin a usb hub and connect all the devices (keyboard, mouse..) for the new seat to it. I haven't had time to do much about me writing about systemd in CBLFS/BLFS. I'm busy for a presentation I will give this in Antwerp: http://we.voidwarranties.be/index.php/VoidCon2011 and been very busy for, as well as writing a new fuse fs basefs, which is a FUSE test fs to decode audio files on the fly. If you need a FUSE fs for your construction, I would like to do that, it's sort of my area. And for a construction I'm working on, a FUSE layer around the normal Linux system, something like GoboLinux I need a scheduler. Now I'm using at, which some enhancements, see: http://linux.bononline.nl/wiki/index.php/At_extension_scripts This does what is needed for my construction, and has features like scripts/program's which can reschedule themselves. Like a rotatelog files script, and it's running every day once. This is ok, but then somehow there appears much more logging, causing the logsize get much much bigger, the script decides it has to run much more frequent, say twice a day. This dynamic behaviour I haven't seen before. At this moment this is complicated, using cron/fcron. With the at extension script this is easy. I'm thinking about writing a new prog, using polkit and the newest techniques like epoll, inotify and timerfd. Something also interesting for systemd? Stef 2011/7/14 Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net: On Thu, 14.07.11 00:20, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: - Similar, there's another one for time changes. Docs in the wiki on this iface will be available shortly. It is now: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/timedated - Multi-seat support is pretty comprehensively available now. X11 and gdm have not been ported to it yet. Documentation about the multi-seat logic will show up in the wiki shortly, too. And here it is: http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat Questions? Comments? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] systemctl -H/-P does not work
Hello. I've been trying to use the -H (remote host) and -P (policykit) options in both 'systemctl' and 'systemd-loginctl', but they always return the same DBus error message: $ systemctl -H localhost Failed to get D-Bus connection: Could not parse server address: Unknown address type (examples of valid types are tcp and on UNIX unix) The same is displayed for -P. DBus is running as system and session bus, and both 'systemctl' and 'systemd-loginctl' work fine locally. $DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS is set to the usual unix:abstract=...,guid=... address. Tested with systemd releases 25-30. Is this a bug, or is there something I'm missing in how the options are supposed to be used? -- Mantas M. (grawity) ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] FYI: glibc getaddrinfo problem with boot
As systemd is helping get to a fully dynamic plug-n-play world this might interest you. I encounted a problem getting httpd to startup reliably on Fedora 15 because of failures of the getaddrinfo function in glibc. I have raised this bug to track the issue. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721350 Barry ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] nspawn remounts /selinux readonly, thus breaking logins
On 07/08/2011 02:39 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: What we currently do is mount a fresh selinuxfs into the container, and not just a bind mount. Apparently that instance isn't so fresh after all... So we probably should use explicit bind mounts after all, and then make them read-only. Most likely a similar problem exists with /proc and nspawn too, but is not visible really. Hi, it now works correctly with systemd-30, as expected. Thanks, Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl -H/-P does not work
On Thu, 14.07.11 12:43, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello. I've been trying to use the -H (remote host) and -P (policykit) options in both 'systemctl' and 'systemd-loginctl', but they always return the same DBus error message: $ systemctl -H localhost Failed to get D-Bus connection: Could not parse server address: Unknown address type (examples of valid types are tcp and on UNIX unix) The same is displayed for -P. DBus is running as system and session bus, and both 'systemctl' and 'systemd-loginctl' work fine locally. $DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS is set to the usual unix:abstract=...,guid=... address. Tested with systemd releases 25-30. Is this a bug, or is there something I'm missing in how the options are supposed to be used? This is dependent on a patch to D-Bus, which is still hanging in bugzilla. I'll spend some time on getting that restarted, so that it finally can be merged. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] FYI: glibc getaddrinfo problem with boot
On Thursday 14 July 2011 12:16:58 Michal Schmidt wrote: On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:03:30 +0100 Barry Scott wrote: As systemd is helping get to a fully dynamic plug-n-play world this might interest you. I encounted a problem getting httpd to startup reliably on Fedora 15 because of failures of the getaddrinfo function in glibc. I have raised this bug to track the issue. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721350 Ah yes, the AI_ADDRCONFIG flag... The problem came up before with privoxy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711587 I'd expect many network aware packages to suffer from this issue. As you say all that was offered is a work around, that in my case will not work. Barry ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd-commits] README
isn't it now a requirement for libudev = 172 now and not 163? That is what I am seeing with v30 -Chris On 07/14/2011 02:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: README |3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) New commits: commit 673eab9bf0d2d79a72f3d7c430807b8786de7ee3 Author: Lennart Poetteringlenn...@poettering.net Date: Thu Jul 14 23:53:53 2011 +0200 README: document license diff --git a/README b/README index cfbcbe7..c58fbcb 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ BUG REPORTS: AUTHOR: Lennart Poettering with major support from Kay Sievers +LICENSE: +GPLv2+ for all code, except sd-daemon.[ch] which is MIT + REQUIREMENTS: Linux kernel= 2.6.30 (with devtmpfs, cgroups; optional but strongly recommended: autofs4, ipv6) libudev= 163 ___ systemd-commits mailing list systemd-comm...@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-commits ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
