Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 19:16 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 02:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? I don't plan on packaging it in the short term, so if there are volunteers, go right ahead. OK, I'll prepare a review request. Thanks a lot! @David: could you make a release of gudev 230? There's a few patches on top gudev 219 currently, and I think it would be less error -prone to package the released version with the bumped version number. I only found a typo-fix on top of 219. Now backported to libgudev and pushed into the gnome bugzilla. Same for the 230 version bump. If anything else is missing, please let me know. And libgudev 230 is out. Sorry about the delay, and thank you for posting those patches on the bugzilla, much better workflow for me :) https://download.gnome.org/sources/libgudev/230/ Cheers ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:56:43AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 19:16 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 02:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? I don't plan on packaging it in the short term, so if there are volunteers, go right ahead. OK, I'll prepare a review request. Thanks a lot! @David: could you make a release of gudev 230? There's a few patches on top gudev 219 currently, and I think it would be less error -prone to package the released version with the bumped version number. I only found a typo-fix on top of 219. Now backported to libgudev and pushed into the gnome bugzilla. Same for the 230 version bump. If anything else is missing, please let me know. And libgudev 230 is out. Sorry about the delay, and thank you for posting those patches on the bugzilla, much better workflow for me :) https://download.gnome.org/sources/libgudev/230/ Thanks! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1227334 Reviews and co-maintaners welcome... Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 02:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:21:06AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 12:01 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). I intend to apply patches to systemd-git until we finally removed it there. Given that we had 0 patches so far this year, it'll probably stay that way. Hence, there's no hurry in replacing gudev from systemd with libgudev. It'd be enough to just drop the systemd sub -package and provide a new libgudev package, even if that might not forcefully update the package. However, I see no reason not to bump it, so I'll gladly follow the packager's demands: https://github.com/systemd -devs/libgudev/commit/f6203336e5b1ccf896acc506b54ec895fdae98b4 @Bastien: At your convenience, can you cherry-pick this and do another release? Should have done this right away, sorry! Could you file this in our new Bugzilla? Otherwise, I end up losing track of it... Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? I don't plan on packaging it in the short term, so if there are volunteers, go right ahead. Cheers ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 16:51 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 02:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:21:06AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 12:01 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now : -) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). I intend to apply patches to systemd-git until we finally removed it there. Given that we had 0 patches so far this year, it'll probably stay that way. Hence, there's no hurry in replacing gudev from systemd with libgudev. It'd be enough to just drop the systemd sub -package and provide a new libgudev package, even if that might not forcefully update the package. However, I see no reason not to bump it, so I'll gladly follow the packager's demands: https://github.com/systemd -devs/libgudev/commit/f6203336e5b1ccf896acc506b54ec895fdae98b 4 @Bastien: At your convenience, can you cherry-pick this and do another release? Should have done this right away, sorry! Could you file this in our new Bugzilla? Otherwise, I end up losing track of it... Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? I don't plan on packaging it in the short term, so if there are volunteers, go right ahead. OK, I'll prepare a review request. @David: could you make a release of gudev 230? There's a few patches on top gudev 219 currently, and I think it would be less error-prone to package the released version with the bumped version number. /me patiently waits for the bugzilla patches to be uploaded... ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 02:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:21:06AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 12:01 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). I intend to apply patches to systemd-git until we finally removed it there. Given that we had 0 patches so far this year, it'll probably stay that way. Hence, there's no hurry in replacing gudev from systemd with libgudev. It'd be enough to just drop the systemd sub -package and provide a new libgudev package, even if that might not forcefully update the package. However, I see no reason not to bump it, so I'll gladly follow the packager's demands: https://github.com/systemd -devs/libgudev/commit/f6203336e5b1ccf896acc506b54ec895fdae98b4 @Bastien: At your convenience, can you cherry-pick this and do another release? Should have done this right away, sorry! Could you file this in our new Bugzilla? Otherwise, I end up losing track of it... Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? I don't plan on packaging it in the short term, so if there are volunteers, go right ahead. OK, I'll prepare a review request. @David: could you make a release of gudev 230? There's a few patches on top gudev 219 currently, and I think it would be less error-prone to package the released version with the bumped version number. Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
Hi On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:51 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 05:48:15PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 02:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? I don't plan on packaging it in the short term, so if there are volunteers, go right ahead. OK, I'll prepare a review request. Thanks a lot! @David: could you make a release of gudev 230? There's a few patches on top gudev 219 currently, and I think it would be less error-prone to package the released version with the bumped version number. I only found a typo-fix on top of 219. Now backported to libgudev and pushed into the gnome bugzilla. Same for the 230 version bump. If anything else is missing, please let me know. Thanks David ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Tue, May 19, 2015, at 11:06 AM, David Herrmann wrote: Hi We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. To preserve backwards compatibility, gudev was extracted into a separate repository and is now managed on gnome.org: Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/libgudev Bugtracker: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=libgudev Releases: http://download.gnome.org/sources/libgudev/ Repository: http://git.gnome.org/browse/libgudev/ ArchLinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/libgudev/PKGBUILD Others: TBD For reference: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-continuous/commit/?id=abc335746078670e18e90cacf4983aef44cacf63 updated GNOME Continuous, and it will now start building and shipping libgudev git master. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:21:06AM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 12:01 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). I intend to apply patches to systemd-git until we finally removed it there. Given that we had 0 patches so far this year, it'll probably stay that way. Hence, there's no hurry in replacing gudev from systemd with libgudev. It'd be enough to just drop the systemd sub-package and provide a new libgudev package, even if that might not forcefully update the package. However, I see no reason not to bump it, so I'll gladly follow the packager's demands: https://github.com/systemd -devs/libgudev/commit/f6203336e5b1ccf896acc506b54ec895fdae98b4 @Bastien: At your convenience, can you cherry-pick this and do another release? Should have done this right away, sorry! Could you file this in our new Bugzilla? Otherwise, I end up losing track of it... Hi Bastien, do you have any plans for the package in Fedora? Zbyszek ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
2015-05-19 17:06 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann dh.herrm...@gmail.com: Hi We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. To preserve backwards compatibility, gudev was extracted into a separate repository and is now managed on gnome.org: Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/libgudev Bugtracker: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=libgudev Releases: http://download.gnome.org/sources/libgudev/ Repository: http://git.gnome.org/browse/libgudev/ ArchLinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/libgudev/PKGBUILD Others: TBD FYI Ubuntu/Debian: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/?h=experimentalid=ff3e6f6fc82adeeb5341b3bbd9824b2591965af6 https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/libgudev.git/commit/?id=c48853e54064485c8c1d4904139e6050f3f6462e Thanks for splitting off gudev. It makes bootstrapping systemd on new architectures quite a bit simpler. Cheers, Michael -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 12:01 +0200, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). I intend to apply patches to systemd-git until we finally removed it there. Given that we had 0 patches so far this year, it'll probably stay that way. Hence, there's no hurry in replacing gudev from systemd with libgudev. It'd be enough to just drop the systemd sub-package and provide a new libgudev package, even if that might not forcefully update the package. However, I see no reason not to bump it, so I'll gladly follow the packager's demands: https://github.com/systemd -devs/libgudev/commit/f6203336e5b1ccf896acc506b54ec895fdae98b4 @Bastien: At your convenience, can you cherry-pick this and do another release? Should have done this right away, sorry! Could you file this in our new Bugzilla? Otherwise, I end up losing track of it... ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). Cheers, Tom ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org) ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
Hi On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote: On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote: Hey David, David Herrmann [2015-05-19 17:06 +0200]: We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. This makes sense indeed. gudev used to be a standalone project before it was merged into udev, so the circle is complete now :-) For those of us who already packaged gudev from systemd 219, would it be possible to bump the current release to 220, so that gudev can be packaged without renaming the tarball and doing ugly version numbers? Monotonously increasing version numbers and all.. (Yes, there are epochs in Debian, and I'm sure RPM has these too, but they might not be available everywhere and are generally frowned upon) While you are at it, why not bump it to 225 or something (just to guarantee that the last systemd release with gudev has a lower version number than gudev at that time, so people can switch over whenever they want without having to worry about going backwards). I intend to apply patches to systemd-git until we finally removed it there. Given that we had 0 patches so far this year, it'll probably stay that way. Hence, there's no hurry in replacing gudev from systemd with libgudev. It'd be enough to just drop the systemd sub-package and provide a new libgudev package, even if that might not forcefully update the package. However, I see no reason not to bump it, so I'll gladly follow the packager's demands: https://github.com/systemd-devs/libgudev/commit/f6203336e5b1ccf896acc506b54ec895fdae98b4 @Bastien: At your convenience, can you cherry-pick this and do another release? Should have done this right away, sorry! Thanks David ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
[systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Separating gudev from systemd
Hi We're about to remove gudev from the systemd repository, as it is in no way related to the systemd code-base, nor used by the systemd project. To preserve backwards compatibility, gudev was extracted into a separate repository and is now managed on gnome.org: Homepage: https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/libgudev Bugtracker: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/browse.cgi?product=libgudev Releases: http://download.gnome.org/sources/libgudev/ Repository: http://git.gnome.org/browse/libgudev/ ArchLinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/libgudev/PKGBUILD Others: TBD The new libgudev project is binary-compatible to gudev as provided by systemd-219. Distributions are encouraged to pass --disable-gudev to systemd and provide gudev via the libgudev project. We haven't decided at which point gudev will be dropped from the systemd repository, but chances are systemd-221 will not include it, anymore. If there are any issues, please let me know. Thanks David ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
