Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2014-02-17 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 14.02.14 20:08, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:44:12AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 27.12.13 10:46, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> > 
> > > The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
> > > a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
> > > be considered a success condition.
> > 
> > Applied! Thanks!
> Hi,
> 
> so now there's a duplication between this patch (29e254f7) and the
> patch I applied instead (a9a305332b).

Oh! I didn't realize that. I have now reverted my commit!

Sorry for the confusion!

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2014-02-14 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 01:44:12AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 27.12.13 10:46, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> 
> > The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
> > a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
> > be considered a success condition.
> 
> Applied! Thanks!
Hi,

so now there's a duplication between this patch (29e254f7) and the
patch I applied instead (a9a305332b).

Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2014-02-13 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 27.12.13 10:46, Dave Reisner (dreis...@archlinux.org) wrote:

> The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
> a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
> be considered a success condition.

Applied! Thanks!

> ---
>  man/systemd.service.xml | 5 -
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
> index 27f069f..c3a9307 100644
> --- a/man/systemd.service.xml
> +++ b/man/systemd.service.xml
> @@ -737,7 +737,10 @@ ExecStart=/bin/echo $ONE $TWO ${TWO}
>  SIGTERM and 
> SIGPIPE. Exit status
>  definitions can either be numeric exit
>  codes or termination signal names,
> -separated by spaces. Example:
> +separated by spaces. Signals will only
> +be considered if the service does not 
> implement
> +a signal handler and exits as a direct result
> +of receiving the signal. Example:
>  SuccessExitStatus=1 2 8
>  SIGKILL, 
> ensures that exit
>  codes 1, 2, 8 and the termination


Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2013-12-27 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 09:09:21PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 27.12.13 17:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:46:48AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> > > The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
> > > a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
> > > be considered a success condition.
> > > ---
> > >  man/systemd.service.xml | 5 -
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
> > > index 27f069f..c3a9307 100644
> > > --- a/man/systemd.service.xml
> > > +++ b/man/systemd.service.xml
> > > @@ -737,7 +737,10 @@ ExecStart=/bin/echo $ONE $TWO ${TWO}
> > >  SIGTERM and 
> > > SIGPIPE. Exit status
> > >  definitions can either be numeric exit
> > >  codes or termination signal names,
> > > -separated by spaces. Example:
> > > +separated by spaces. Signals will only
> > > +be considered if the service does not 
> > > implement
> > > +a signal handler and exits as a direct 
> > > result
> > > +of receiving the signal. Example:
> > >  SuccessExitStatus=1 2 8
> > >  SIGKILL, 
> > > ensures that exit
> > >  codes 1, 2, 8 and the termination
> > This is incorrect/misleading too. Normally you're supposed to have a
> > signal handler, do cleanup, uninstall the handler, and then signal
> > yourself again.
> 
> We certainly don't do that in systemd... I never heard of that
> suggestion, I must say. (Any link where this is suggested?) I must say
> that Dave's addition sounded correct to me, even though you do have a
> point that one can uninstall the signal handler and trigger the signal
> again...

I suppose a9a305332b addresses both sides of this. Thanks!
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2013-12-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 27.12.13 17:00, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:

> 
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:46:48AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> > The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
> > a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
> > be considered a success condition.
> > ---
> >  man/systemd.service.xml | 5 -
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
> > index 27f069f..c3a9307 100644
> > --- a/man/systemd.service.xml
> > +++ b/man/systemd.service.xml
> > @@ -737,7 +737,10 @@ ExecStart=/bin/echo $ONE $TWO ${TWO}
> >  SIGTERM and 
> > SIGPIPE. Exit status
> >  definitions can either be numeric exit
> >  codes or termination signal names,
> > -separated by spaces. Example:
> > +separated by spaces. Signals will only
> > +be considered if the service does not 
> > implement
> > +a signal handler and exits as a direct 
> > result
> > +of receiving the signal. Example:
> >  SuccessExitStatus=1 2 8
> >  SIGKILL, 
> > ensures that exit
> >  codes 1, 2, 8 and the termination
> This is incorrect/misleading too. Normally you're supposed to have a
> signal handler, do cleanup, uninstall the handler, and then signal
> yourself again.

We certainly don't do that in systemd... I never heard of that
suggestion, I must say. (Any link where this is suggested?) I must say
that Dave's addition sounded correct to me, even though you do have a
point that one can uninstall the signal handler and trigger the signal
again...

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2013-12-27 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 10:46:48AM -0500, Dave Reisner wrote:
> The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
> a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
> be considered a success condition.
> ---
>  man/systemd.service.xml | 5 -
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
> index 27f069f..c3a9307 100644
> --- a/man/systemd.service.xml
> +++ b/man/systemd.service.xml
> @@ -737,7 +737,10 @@ ExecStart=/bin/echo $ONE $TWO ${TWO}
>  SIGTERM and 
> SIGPIPE. Exit status
>  definitions can either be numeric exit
>  codes or termination signal names,
> -separated by spaces. Example:
> +separated by spaces. Signals will only
> +be considered if the service does not 
> implement
> +a signal handler and exits as a direct result
> +of receiving the signal. Example:
>  SuccessExitStatus=1 2 8
>  SIGKILL, 
> ensures that exit
>  codes 1, 2, 8 and the termination
This is incorrect/misleading too. Normally you're supposed to have a
signal handler, do cleanup, uninstall the handler, and then signal
yourself again.

Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd.service(5): clarify behavior of SuccessExitStatus

2013-12-27 Thread Dave Reisner
The behavior of this is a little cryptic in that $MAINPID must exit as
a direct result of receiving a signal in order for a listed signal to
be considered a success condition.
---
 man/systemd.service.xml | 5 -
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/man/systemd.service.xml b/man/systemd.service.xml
index 27f069f..c3a9307 100644
--- a/man/systemd.service.xml
+++ b/man/systemd.service.xml
@@ -737,7 +737,10 @@ ExecStart=/bin/echo $ONE $TWO ${TWO}
 SIGTERM and 
SIGPIPE. Exit status
 definitions can either be numeric exit
 codes or termination signal names,
-separated by spaces. Example:
+separated by spaces. Signals will only
+be considered if the service does not implement
+a signal handler and exits as a direct result
+of receiving the signal. Example:
 SuccessExitStatus=1 2 8
 SIGKILL, 
ensures that exit
 codes 1, 2, 8 and the termination
-- 
1.8.5.2

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel