Re: [systemd-devel] .network has [Link] and there's already .link

2018-07-13 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 13.07.18 18:52, Francis Moreau (francis.m...@gmail.com) wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I dont understand .network has [Link] section whereas network device
> configuration can also done with .link file.
> 
> It seems that there's a overlap... what is the rational here ?

.link generally only contains link-specific options, while .network
generally only contains network-specific options. There are a few
options howver that are kinda in the middle, and fit into both
categories, for example the MTU. Hence .network has a section for that
kind of stuff, even though .link already has them.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] .network has [Link] and there's already .link

2018-07-13 Thread Francis Moreau
Hello,

I dont understand .network has [Link] section whereas network device
configuration can also done with .link file.

It seems that there's a overlap... what is the rational here ?

Thank you in advance.
-- 
Francis
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel