Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl list-dependencies: consider BindsTo as well?

2014-11-30 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 23.11.14 12:55, Peter Mattern (matte...@arcor.de) wrote:

 Thanks for fixing this.
 
 May I suggest to adjust man systemctl accordingly, too?
 Necessary parts would be the one about option --reverse and command
 list-dependencies.
 As for the latter I'd suggest another change while you're at it. Phrase
 required and wanted units is rather ambiguous as it might make think of
 WantedBy and RequiredBy which don't apply here, if I didn't get it wrong. I
 for one think it would be better to simply state the parameters themselves,
 much as it's done with --reverse already, e. g. something like Show units
 stated by options Requires, Wants or BindsTo in unit NAME.

Just for completeness' sake: Zbigniew made some more changes to the
man page, and I think it should say now everything you are asking
for. Please have a look.

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl list-dependencies: consider BindsTo as well?

2014-11-23 Thread Peter Mattern

Thanks for fixing this.

May I suggest to adjust man systemctl accordingly, too?
Necessary parts would be the one about option --reverse and command 
list-dependencies.
As for the latter I'd suggest another change while you're at it. Phrase 
required and wanted units is rather ambiguous as it might make think 
of WantedBy and RequiredBy which don't apply here, if I didn't get it 
wrong. I for one think it would be better to simply state the parameters 
themselves, much as it's done with --reverse already, e. g. something 
like Show units stated by options Requires, Wants or BindsTo in unit NAME.

___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] systemctl list-dependencies: consider BindsTo as well?

2014-11-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 09:23:19PM +0100, Peter Mattern wrote:
 Hello.
 
 Right now systemctl's command list-dependencies is considering
 parameters Wants and Requires only.
 
 But given that command's purpose I was wondering whether it wouldn't
 make sense to have it consider BindsTo as well.
Yeah, it should. Done now in git.

Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


[systemd-devel] systemctl list-dependencies: consider BindsTo as well?

2014-11-21 Thread Peter Mattern

Hello.

Right now systemctl's command list-dependencies is considering 
parameters Wants and Requires only.


But given that command's purpose I was wondering whether it wouldn't 
make sense to have it consider BindsTo as well.


Regards,

Peter Mattern
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel