Re: [systemd-devel] test-tables failure

2013-07-16 Thread Jan Janssen

On 07/16/2013 04:33 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:

On Tue, 16.07.13 14:57, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:


Hi,

test-tables fails on my system. The one it's failing on is:
 syscall: 222 → (null) → -1

syscall_max() tells me that I have 351 syscalls, so I guess
there is a logic error in the test case?

This is on a pretty old x86 machine.


Hmm, on your system do you have a syscall 222 defined anywhere in
sys/syscall.h (or any of the headers that pulls in)?

Lennart



Nope, unistd_x32.h nor unistd_32.h (whichever one is included from
syscall.h on my system) has syscall 222.

Jan
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel


Re: [systemd-devel] test-tables failure

2013-07-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:43:02PM +0200, Jan Janssen wrote:
 On 07/16/2013 04:33 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
 On Tue, 16.07.13 14:57, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
 test-tables fails on my system. The one it's failing on is:
  syscall: 222 → (null) → -1
 
 syscall_max() tells me that I have 351 syscalls, so I guess
 there is a logic error in the test case?
 
 This is on a pretty old x86 machine.
 
 Hmm, on your system do you have a syscall 222 defined anywhere in
 sys/syscall.h (or any of the headers that pulls in)?
 
 Lennart
 
 
 Nope, unistd_x32.h nor unistd_32.h (whichever one is included from
 syscall.h on my system) has syscall 222.
I'll fix the test to accept holes in the syscall table.

-- 
they are not broken. they are refucktored
   -- alxchk
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel