Re: [systemd-devel] Is it possible to start other service units by a service unit which was killed?
В Tue, 17 Dec 2013 04:13:33 +0900 Tony Seo пишет: > > But I'm curious about "fail" from your answer, now. > What is the "fail signal" in systemd? When process terminated unexpectedly with any exit status that does not mean "normal exit". See SuccessExitStatus in man systemd.service. ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Is it possible to start other service units by a service unit which was killed?
Because I have managed a few processes in systemd, I'd like to just start all processes at the same time when one of the process was failed or dead with kill signal. But I'm curious about "fail" from your answer, now. What is the "fail signal" in systemd? I don't know how to make systemd take "fail" by some signal or method in source code. Thanks ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Is it possible to start other service units by a service unit which was killed
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 02:26:02AM +0900, Tony Seo wrote: > Hello. > > I send this mail to know whether systemd have options to solve this problem > without socket activation. > > what I have experienced situation is like: > If I have A.service, B.service and C.service, I'd like to set [service] in > A.service to make others started when A.service is exited(fail, exit .. are > not important) Tha would be OnFailure= (described in man systemd.unit). -- Tomasz Torcz RIP is irrevelant. Spoofing is futile. xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl Your routes will be aggreggated. -- Alex Yuriev ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
Re: [systemd-devel] Is it possible to start other service units by a service unit which was killed
В Mon, 16 Dec 2013 02:26:02 +0900 Tony Seo пишет: > Hello. > > I send this mail to know whether systemd have options to solve this problem > without socket activation. > > what I have experienced situation is like: > If I have A.service, B.service and C.service, I'd like to set [service] in > A.service to make others started when A.service is exited(fail, exit .. are > not important) For fail - see OnFailure (man systemd.unit). For clean exit I guess the only way is to call systemctl directly. Why would you want to do it in case of normal exit? May be there are other ways to achieve your goal? > A.service-- > [service] > ExecStart=/bin/program > Restart=always > -->?(I don't know that some options to start B.service and C.service) > > > So, I have checked some options in [service] manual, but I have not > detected some options to start other units when A.service was killed. > I really want to know that systemd have methods or options to solve my > problem without socket activation. > > Thanks ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
