Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread Paul Alsdorf

I'll second this.  I did some research as an undergrad where we were able
to convert the muscle fiber type in mice from type 1 (slow) to type IIB
(fast).  This was the gastrocnemius muscle; there was no switching or
trauma involed.  We induced the conversion by completely unweighting the
hind legs of the mice (they could still walk around, but did it using
their front legs).  Apparently in an atrophied state, the muscle reverts
to fast-twitch type.

What seems to be the case is that the natural, untrained muscle fiber
composition is determined by genetics, as is the range of 'changeability'
of muscle fiber type.  For example, your average Joe might be 50% fast,
but be able to range between 30 and 70% depending on what he's
doing.  Whereas an ultrarunner might be 90% slow and only able to get down
to 80% no matter what he does.

There is a significant amount of conversion that can take place, depending
on workload.  Now I don't know about conversion from fast to slow, so I
can't speak to high school sprinters doing XC.  But I wouldn't be
surprised if it could change their muscle fiber composition.

Paul

On Sat, 5 May 2001, Ed Prytherch wrote:

 There was a report of an experiment in New Studies in Athletics (IAAF) a few
 years ago which appears to contradict this. The experimenters switched the
 soleus and gastrocnemius muscles in a dog. One of the muscles (I can't
 remember which) has a higher proportion of fast twitch fibers. At first the
 dog had difficulty walking, but after some time it learned to walk with the
 switched muscles. Muscle biopsies were performed after the dog had fully
 adapted. The muscle which had previously been predominantly slow twitch had
 become predominantly fast twitch and vice versa.
 
 Some sprint coaches (Loren Seagrave, Charlie Francis) are strongly opposed
 to young sprinters doing much endurance work because they think that there
 may be a conversion of fast twitch to slow twitch fibers.
 
 But Monique Henderson ran cross country!
 
 Ed Prytherch
 





Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread Ed Dana Parrot

Paul -

Great, informative post.  I had not been aware of this research.  A
question, which may be more theoretical than scientific, will untrained
fast-twitch muscles be able to sprint faster than trained slow-twitch
muscles?  And is it possible for a reasonably active person to change the
composition of fibers significantly based on the type of training he does,
or is it only by removing all stress on the muscle that the fibers revert to
fast twitch?

Is there any reseach that suggests that the fiber-switch that Paul
observed in unweighted muscles could be stimulated in a more practical way?

- Ed Parrot




Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread Elliott Oti


- Original Message -
From: Ed  Dana Parrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Paul -

 Great, informative post.  I had not been aware of this research.  A
 question, which may be more theoretical than scientific, will untrained
 fast-twitch muscles be able to sprint faster than trained slow-twitch
 muscles?

Haile Gebreselassie has run the 1500m in 3.32 and the 10km in 26.31. I
recall reading an interview three or four years ago with a local Dutch rag
in which he said his best 100m time was around 11.2 or 11.3 seconds. This
would be a very decent sprint time for the world's top female sprinters. As
far as total muscle mass goes, Gebreselassie weighs about 55kg, which means
that he is roughly about the same size as a top female sprinter. If his
muscles are slow-twitch then they're pretty competitive in terms of
power/weight against fast-twitch.






Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread Tom Derderian

So, for 20 million you could go into orbit and the zero G would convert your
slow twitch to fast...Is that what Tito was doing?
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Ed  Dana Parrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?


 Paul -

 Great, informative post.  I had not been aware of this research.  A
 question, which may be more theoretical than scientific, will untrained
 fast-twitch muscles be able to sprint faster than trained slow-twitch
 muscles?  And is it possible for a reasonably active person to change the
 composition of fibers significantly based on the type of training he does,
 or is it only by removing all stress on the muscle that the fibers revert
to
 fast twitch?

 Is there any reseach that suggests that the fiber-switch that Paul
 observed in unweighted muscles could be stimulated in a more practical
way?

 - Ed Parrot





Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread P.F.Talbot

On Mon, 7 May 2001, Elliott Oti wrote:
 Haile Gebreselassie has run the 1500m in 3.32 and the 10km in 26.31. I
 recall reading an interview three or four years ago with a local Dutch rag
 in which he said his best 100m time was around 11.2 or 11.3 seconds. This
 would be a very decent sprint time for the world's top female sprinters. As
 far as total muscle mass goes, Gebreselassie weighs about 55kg, which means
 that he is roughly about the same size as a top female sprinter. If his
 muscles are slow-twitch then they're pretty competitive in terms of
 power/weight against fast-twitch.

This is a good point which is that we cannot peg an event to a specific
fast to slow twitch muscle ratio.  Said Auoita ranked #1 in the world at
both 800m and at 10,000m.

Late in his career Coe had planned on moving up to the 5,000 where he
thought he could run between 13:00 and 13:15 (injuries forced him back to
the 1500).

I don't know about Gebresellasie but both Coe and Aouita (who says he
based a lot of his trainging on Coe's) were distance guys (Coe was a
1500-3000m guy in high school) who worked out heavily with weights (aouita
is reportedly said to have lifted every day) to increase their speed.

There is certainly a lot we don't know about the mix of speed an
endurance.  Given the relatively little improvement in the 800 over the
last 20 years it doesn't seem too many people are figuring it out.

Regards,

Paul




Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread Dan Kaplan

--- Elliott Oti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Gebreselassie weighs about 55kg, which means
 that he is roughly about the same size as a top female sprinter.

He's also roughly 9 inches shorter than *the* top female sprinter, but I
doubt that has any relevance.

Dan

=
http://AbleDesign.com - AbleDesign, Web Design that Can!
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Free Contests...

  @o   Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (lifetime forwarding address)
   /   /   (503)370-9969 phone/fax

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/



Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-07 Thread Dennis Driscoll

Altitude training for sprinters?

Dennis
- Original Message -
From: Tom Derderian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ed  Dana Parrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu'
(E-mail) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?


 So, for 20 million you could go into orbit and the zero G would convert
your
 slow twitch to fast...Is that what Tito was doing?
 Tom
 - Original Message -
 From: Ed  Dana Parrot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 't-and-f@darkwing. uoregon. edu' (E-mail)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:58 AM
 Subject: Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?


  Paul -
 
  Great, informative post.  I had not been aware of this research.  A
  question, which may be more theoretical than scientific, will untrained
  fast-twitch muscles be able to sprint faster than trained slow-twitch
  muscles?  And is it possible for a reasonably active person to change
the
  composition of fibers significantly based on the type of training he
does,
  or is it only by removing all stress on the muscle that the fibers
revert
 to
  fast twitch?
 
  Is there any reseach that suggests that the fiber-switch that Paul
  observed in unweighted muscles could be stimulated in a more practical
 way?
 
  - Ed Parrot
 







Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-06 Thread Ed Dana Parrot

 There was a report of an experiment in New Studies in Athletics (IAAF) a
few
 years ago which appears to contradict this. The experimenters switched the
 soleus and gastrocnemius muscles in a dog. One of the muscles (I can't
 remember which) has a higher proportion of fast twitch fibers. At first
the
 dog had difficulty walking, but after some time it learned to walk with
the
 switched muscles. Muscle biopsies were performed after the dog had fully
 adapted. The muscle which had previously been predominantly slow twitch
had
 become predominantly fast twitch and vice versa.

All this proves is that the body of the dog was incredibly adaptable when
faced with the tremendous trauma of having it's muscles switched.  This is
not an entirely surprising discovery.  It suggests that part of the
definition of muscle type is related to the context of the muscle.

Given that all the body's cells are broken down and recreated on a regular
basis, and that none of the muscle cells you have today are actually the
same cells you had three months ago in a literal sense, we should be even
less surprised that as the body rebuilt cells, it did so the way it
remembered they should have been.

Now if you could trick the body into thinking that a fast twitch muscle
belonged where a slow twitch muscle was, you'd have something.  But if you
could do that, you could probably trick the body into thinking that healthy
tissue belonged where a malignant tumor was, which would be a pretty
impressive feat.

- Ed Parrot




Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-06 Thread Michael Rohl


Netters

Here is an example of what I consider a valuable contribution by Mr. Entine:
 The Mystery and Myths of Muscles

Michael Rohl



Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-06 Thread Dgs1170
This is a topic that always interest me because there is not a clear answer.
It seems as though there is a balance that is needed.
Charlie Francis and Loren Seagrave seem flawed in their assessments given the 
results of athletes they have coached. Loren has not had a successful 
athlete since Dawn Sowell, and Charlie Francis is known for 2 things, 
steroids, and young athletes. The former needs no mention, the latter is the 
result of talent, not training.
I have witnessed nothing that says you can "kill" fast twitch. From the 
results of our training I would definitely say there is some sort of balance 
needed. I will remain shallow in this discussion because it is far too 
scientific for my taste. I will continue to listen until I obtain enough 
information to speak about it (That will probably be tomorrow!LOL).

DGS
Faith is a road seldom traveled
Let us run with patience the race that is set before us, looking unto Jesus, 
the author and finisher of our faith" Hebrews 12: 1-2 



Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-05 Thread Tom Derderian

I think Jon and the parents and the coach may have missed something about
the school girls who were sprinters in the spring, ran cross-country and in
the subsequent spring, could not sprint as well. I suspect they just grew.
They got bigger and heavier and slower. The fiber type didn't change, just
the load did. The science would know their weight before and after.
Something which I we don't know. But that seems the simplest answer.
Tom, who is much older, heavier, and slower.


- Original Message -
From: Jon Entine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: t-and-f-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Track and Field
List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?


 Paul:

 The coach and the parents of these girls do not know what they are talking
 about. Here's a few relevant paragraphs from Taboo.

deleted stuff from Taboo, because you should have the book on your
bookshelf.



  I coach cross country in the fall at one school and
  track in the spring at another school (very small).
  While watching some of the girls running the 4 x 400
  relay (from the team that I coach cross country with,
  but not track), I saw some new faces that were running
  about 61 and 63 second splits.
 
  I made reference that we should try and recruit these
  girls for cross country in the fall to try and help
  rebuild our team (defending state champions).  Some
  coaches and the parents of these girls heard me say
  this and ALL had the following response.
 
  If these girls run cross country they will lose their
  fast twitch muscles while developing slow twitch
  muscles.  When spring comes around for track season,
  these so called sprinters will not be the same because
  they cannot regain the fast twitch muscles that they
  lost.
 
  The parents of these girls told me that their doctor
  had told them this theory when they had specificaly
  asked him the question.  The parents are somewhat
  interested in having the girls run cross country, but
  don't want to see them run slower during track because
  of cross country.
 
  This same theory was also told to me from one of these
  girls coaches.  He says that Time and time again he
  has seen sprinters join cross country in the fall to
  try and stay in shape, and then not be the same
  sprinter the following spring because of what cross
  country did to them.
 
  I would greatly apprecriate any research that has been
  done on the subject, and you may either reply to me
  privately or to the list.
 
  I'm not an expert on the fast twitch/slow twitch
  muscle thing, but based on numerous years of coaching
  and T  F education I can't say that I agree 100
  percent to their theory.
 
  Since I am not an expert, I am looking for those in
  the know to just clarify things for me.  I'm not
  trying to prove anyone wrong, but I just want to be
  100 percent positive on my facts when I present my
  case. :)
 
  Paul Nisius
  Bigfork, MN

 --
 Jon Entine
 RuffRun
 6178 Grey Rock Rd.
 Agoura Hills, CA 91301
 (818) 991-9803 [FAX] 991-9804
 http://www.jonentine.com





Re: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?

2001-05-05 Thread Ed Prytherch

There was a report of an experiment in New Studies in Athletics (IAAF) a few
years ago which appears to contradict this. The experimenters switched the
soleus and gastrocnemius muscles in a dog. One of the muscles (I can't
remember which) has a higher proportion of fast twitch fibers. At first the
dog had difficulty walking, but after some time it learned to walk with the
switched muscles. Muscle biopsies were performed after the dog had fully
adapted. The muscle which had previously been predominantly slow twitch had
become predominantly fast twitch and vice versa.

Some sprint coaches (Loren Seagrave, Charlie Francis) are strongly opposed
to young sprinters doing much endurance work because they think that there
may be a conversion of fast twitch to slow twitch fibers.

But Monique Henderson ran cross country!

Ed Prytherch

- Original Message -
From: Jon Entine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: t-and-f-digest [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Track and
Field List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: t-and-f: Re: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?


 Paul:

 The coach and the parents of these girls do not know what they are talking
 about. Here's a few relevant paragraphs from Taboo.

 The Mystery and Myths of Muscles
 ³Is the composition of muscle tissue of blacks different from that of
 whites?² asks a reader in a letter to Muscle  Fitness magazine. ³To me,
the
 muscle definition of black bodybuilders ... looks better than that of
their
 white counterparts.²  It certainly seems that something is going on. But
is
 it a projection of white insecurities or something more substantive?
 For years it was axiomatic that performance differences were linked to
 muscle composition. It was believed that muscles have two types of
 fibers­white, or fast-twitch, which were thought to be adapted for power
 movements, such as leaping or sprinting; and red, or slow-twitch, which
were
 adapted for endurance. Now we know the model is slightly more complicated.
 There are in fact two different types of fast-twitch fibers, one more
 metabolically efficient. Whites on average have a higher percentage of
 slow-twitch fibers than West African blacks, who generally have more of
both
 types of fast-twitch fibers.

 So what is the significance of these differences?
 Geneticist and exercise physiologist Claude Bouchard at Laval University
in
 Quebec City, known as a guru on muscles and metabolism, has run numerous
 experiments comparing two populations, French­Canadian and West African
 students. Using long needles inserted into the thighs of test subjects,
 Bouchard¹s team extracted tiny sections of fibers, which look to the naked
 eye like pieces of raw meat. They were chemically treated to reveal
 metabolic differences, put on a glass slide, and slipped under a
high-power
 microscope, where they appeared as a collage of tiny red and white
crocodile
 scales. The West African subjects, by a ratio of approximately two to one,
 had more of the larger fast-twitch fibers.  The researchers concluded that
 the force generating capacity of type-II muscle fibers at high velocity,
the
 speed and tempo of movements, and the capacity of an individual to adapt
to
 exercise training are all genetically influenced.

 Although physical activity can improve fitness, with a few caveats, it
 cannot alter a person¹s biological endowment by converting fast-twitch
 fibers to slow-twitch ones, or vice versa (although people do gradually
and
 permanently lose fast-twitch muscles as a result of aging).  It¹s
estimated
 that 40 percent is due to environmental influences such as exercise,
whereas
 45 percent is associated with genetic factors (the remaining 15 percent is
 due to sampling error). At the far end of the performance bell curve in
 sprinting, where small differences can be crucial, genetics clearly
 circumscribes possibility.

 Note: Scientists have converted type I slow-twitch fibers to type II
fibers
 with the use of long-term electrically induced contractions. And training
 can convert the less metabolically efficient fibers into more efficient
 ones­for instance, when trained athletes run so fast that they go into
 severe oxygen debt, forcing the muscles to use oxygen more efficiently.


 On 5/5/01 2:03 PM, t-and-f-digest
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

  Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 09:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
  From: Paul Nisius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: t-and-f: Fast twitch/slow twitch question?
 
  The following debate came up at a high school track
  meet last night and I am looking for some expert
  opinions on the topic.
 
  I coach cross country in the fall at one school and
  track in the spring at another school (very small).
  While watching some of the girls running the 4 x 400
  relay (from the team that I coach cross country with,
  but not track), I saw some new faces that were running
  about 61 and 63 second splits.
 
  I made reference that we should try and recruit these
  girls for cross country in the fall to try and help