Re: t-and-f: WR for Geb

2003-02-24 Thread fhighfil
I calculate Geb's 2M to be equivalent to about 7:29.5 3000m (only 
slightly voodoo since it is only to 1 decimal place), some 3 seconds shy of 
Komen's World Indoor Best.  


Quoting ghill [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 or, more properly, WR
 
 8:04.69 for 2M in Birmingham. Chops about 5 seconds off the old mark, but
 is
 still about 5 seconds short of the 3000 equivalent.
 
 
 gh
 
 




Re: t-and-f: WR for Geb

2003-02-24 Thread Reddragon3147
In a message dated 2/24/2003 8:30:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (track list) 

more like 7:32.8+?


Re: t-and-f: WR for Geb

2003-02-24 Thread Martin J. Dixon
gh is right. On a straight conversion, you are about 5 seconds off with
a 7:31.86. Using Jonas' conversion tables, the time is closer to
7:29.15, which I assume is what [EMAIL PROTECTED] was trying to do, and
that is about 3 seconds off.
Regards,
Martin

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 In a message dated 2/24/2003 8:30:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (track list) 
 
 more like 7:32.8+?


Re: t-and-f: WR for Geb

2003-02-24 Thread fhighfil
I stand by my conversion at 7:29.5.

Floyd Highfill


Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 In a message dated 2/24/2003 8:30:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (track list) 
 
 more like 7:32.8+?