Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread Tom Derderian

That is the joke. The recipe is really bad. All that flour and blended
oatmeal, whatever that is, a total of 9 cups, with only 2 cups of sugar
would make cakey lumps of tasteless gunk. Only 24 oz of chocolate chips? And
why grate the Hershey bar? ...totally stupid recipe. For only $100 bucks you
can have one of mine.
Tom, who is the baker in our house.

- Original Message -
From: John Lunn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: George Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Bale [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sport History Scholars list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Track  Field List (E-mail 2)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Anthony P. Bale
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe


 It seems to me that the most important issue is that of the recipe. Has
anyone
 tried it? Is it any good? Is there such a thing as a bad chocolate chip
cookie?
 Have we had every discussion known to mankind concerning track and field?
 John

 George Cole wrote:

  THIS IS NOT A TRUE STORY and should not be on this list even if it
was!!!
 
  This same true story has been passed around for years - by word of
mouth
  before the internet.
 
  George
 
  - Original Message -
  From: John Bale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Sport History Scholars list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: Track  Field List (E-mail 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Anthony P.
  Bale [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 6:49 AM
  Subject: t-and-f: Fw: recipe
 
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Joanna Redman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Lee Love (E-mail)
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Steph Acton [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John
Bale
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Susan Booth [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Will
   Bradbury [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Simon Brentford
  [EMAIL PROTECTED];
   Simon Brentford [EMAIL PROTECTED]; jason brister
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; andy burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Chris
   Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Steve Champ
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Paul Channin [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  Rupert
   Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ruth Covell
  [EMAIL PROTECTED];
   Kat Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kat Duncan
  [EMAIL PROTECTED];
   catherine dyson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John Fletcher
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marie Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ben
frank
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; sara
   Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:55 PM
   Subject: recipe
  
  
Another true story?
   
It figures, another large corporation trying to screw
the little man -
this
should teach them!  Pass it on - it is one way to
get them back
   
  This is great.
  A little background: Neiman-Marcus, if you don't
  know already, is a very expensive store; i.e.,
they
  sell your typical $8.00 T-shirt for $50.00.
  Let's let them have it!
  
  THIS IS A TRUE STORY
  
  My daughter and I had just finished a salad at a
  Neiman-Marcus Cafe in Dallas, and we decided to
have
  a small dessert.  Because both of us are such
cookie
  lovers, we decided to try the Neiman-Marcus
  cookie.
  It was so excellent that I asked if they would
give
  me the recipe, and the waitress said with a small
frown,
  I'm afraid not, but you can buy the recipe.
  Well, I asked how much, and she responded, Only
two
  fifty-it's a great deal! I agreed to that, and
told
  her to just add it to my tab.
Thirty days later, I received my VISA
  statement, and the Neiman-Marcus charge was
$285.00!
  I looked again, and I remembered I had only spent
  $9.95 for two salads and about $20.00 for a
scarf.
  As I glanced at the bottom of the statement, it
  said, Cookie Recipe-$250.00. That was
outrageous!
I called Neiman's Accounting Department and
  told them the waitress said it was two fifty,
  which clearly does not mean two hundred and
fifty
  dollars by any reasonable interpretation of the
  phrase.
Neiman-Marcus refused to budge. They would
not
  refund my money because, according to them, What
  the waitress told you is not our problem.  You
have
  already seen the recipe. We absolutely will not
  refund your money
  at this point. I explained to the Accounting
  Department lady the criminal statutes which
govern
  fraud in the state of Texas. I threatened to
report
  them to the Better Business Bureau and the Texas
  Attorney General's office for engaging in fraud.
I
  was basically told, Do what you want. Don't
bother
  thinking of how you can get even, and don't
bother
  trying to get any of your money back. I just
said,
  Okay, you folks got my $250, and now I'm going
to
  have $250 worth of fun.
I told her that I was going to see to it
that
  every cookie lover in the United States with an
  e-mail account has a $250 cookie recipe from
  Neiman-Marcus...for free. She 

Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread Runtenkm

What's really remarkable is that there have been more posts regarding this hoax than 
there were regarding Mt. Sac, the upcoming Cardinal Invite or even the Penn Relays.

Steve S. 



Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread JimRTimes

I hear Jon Drummond is going to claim he was bringing in that stash to add to 
the mix, making a batch of Nieman Marcus/Alice B. Toklas cookies.

Jim Gerweck
Running Times



Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread Kurt Bray

Yeah, the only thread bigger than the cookie thread is the recurring 
discussion over nobody saying anything about track.  If all those who are 
inclined to post complaints about the lack of track talk would post 
something about track instead, the problem would would not exist in the 
first place.

Kurt Bray

What's really remarkable is that there have been more posts regarding this 
hoax than there were regarding Mt. Sac, the upcoming Cardinal Invite or 
even the Penn Relays.

Steve S.


_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com




Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread koala

On Thu, 02 May 2002 20:18:21 +, you wrote:

Yeah, the only thread bigger than the cookie thread is the recurring 
discussion over nobody saying anything about track.  If all those who are 
inclined to post complaints about the lack of track talk would post 
something about track instead, the problem would would not exist in the 
first place.


Just like those who complain about not marking every throw in Suzy Powell's
recent AR series are those who refuse to get off their duff up in the press
box and go down and help mark on the field, when the meet is obviously
short of officials. (it's my job as a journalist to point out problems; not
solve them!)
I have absolutely no problem with somebody marking, or 'shagging' implements
in the field, with a portable mike in their hand, announcing to the crowd
who's up next at the same time, as long as they pay attention (safety).

By the way, I'm curious- usually three competent officials (sometimes even
just two) are all that are needed to mark every throw and still keep
the competition moving along expeditiously.
If every throw was not marked in San Diego, one might assume they only had one or two
officials available.

Yet American (and World) records require signoff by three certified officials
last time I checked.  Is Suzy's WR in jeapardy because it wasn't witnessed by
enough USATF officials?  If it's NOT in jeapardy, what were those officials
doing, just standing around? 

Randy




RE: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread malmo

Shrimp Plate $1.99


malmo

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk


What's really remarkable is that there have been more posts regarding
this hoax than there were regarding Mt. Sac, the upcoming Cardinal
Invite or even the Penn Relays.

Steve S. 




Re: t-and-f: Fw: recipe, cakey lumps of tastless gunk

2002-05-02 Thread JimRTimes


In a message dated 5/2/02 7:37:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

If it's NOT in jeapardy, what were those officials
doing, just standing around? 

Why, witnessing, what else?

Jim Gerweck
Running Times