Re: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL

2003-01-08 Thread Dave Johnson
You mean Crowley, Layden, Stuhldreher and Miller?

my guess is, Apocalypse didn't make it, since they're saying 5 finalists. If
Apoc. was the winner, the four finalists would be famine, pestilence...

 From: Bloomquist, Bret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Bloomquist, Bret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:23:08 -0500
 To: 'Dan Kaplan' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL

 The usatf website says voting for the finalists begins today. The longer
 this thread gets kicked around, the more impatient I am to find out the five
 finalists. Did Apocolypse make it?


Dave Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





t-and-f: re: Mascot Choices

2003-01-08 Thread Michael J. Roth
Random thoughts on the available names:

1.  Cinders - what is left of the track at Stony Brook University 
because the AD wanted better sightlines for football in their new 
stadium so they left out the track.
2.  Re-run - fat kid from 70's sitcom, Hey hey hey, what's happenin Rog!
3.  Spike - love crossed, tragic hearted vampire on Buffy.
4.  Tailwind - horrible sneaker and Naval sex scandal, dunno which was 
more embarrassing.
5.  Victor E. - Victor Borge is much more entertaining.
6.  ZoomByU - Zoomoofadoo (kids animal TV program) is more likely to get 
their attention.

Spike wins, as he's undead, kicks butt  hangs with the Slayer!

MJR



RE: t-and-f: re: Mascot Choices

2003-01-08 Thread Paul V. Tucknott


4.  Tailwind - horrible sneaker and Naval sex scandal, dunno which was
more embarrassing.


Make that Tailhook . . . The US Naval Aviators convention that was in
Vegas I believe?

Paul





Re: t-and-f: re: Mascot Choices

2003-01-08 Thread Mike Prizy
I submitted Fartlek also. H? What were the rules for making the short list? I say 
Fartlek as a
write in.

Reuben Frank wrote:

 I still can't believe my entry - Fartlek - didn't
 make the cut.

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
 http://mailplus.yahoo.com




RE: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL

2003-01-07 Thread USATF Communications
Coming soon!

Jill M. Geer
USATF Director of Communications
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone/fax: 508-695-0595

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bloomquist, Bret
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 5:23 PM
To: 'Dan Kaplan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL


The usatf website says voting for the finalists begins today. The longer
this thread gets kicked around, the more impatient I am to find out the five
finalists. Did Apocolypse make it?

 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Kaplan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 11:17 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: t-and-f: re: Mascot

  Mascots attract kids, there is no debating this,
  anything to the contrary is pointless banter.

 I take it that's your way of saying you can't support the statement?  I
 still haven't seen any evidence provided for the position that a mascot
 will directly help USATF financially.  We already know it's done a
 disservice to the organization in terms of negative publicity -- and no,
 that has absolutely nothing to do with no matter what USATF does, people
 are going to crucify it; it's simply an awful mascot -- so I'm assuming
 there has to be some market research indicating that that factor can be
 overcome by having pictures taken with kids.  Makes perfect sense.  Go
 after the people without money and alienate the paying customers who might
 even be participants.

 Dan

 --- Michael J. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The Mascot has an equal stupidity look, but kids don't know the
  difference, so the point is moot.  Mascots attract kids, there is no
  debating this, anything to the contrary is pointless banter.  Whether
  the children are spectators or contestants (we're not talking Millrose
  here, but JO meets for appearances) this is a positive financial
  opportunity for USATF  TnF as a whole.  Kids will have something else
  to remember outside of the events they contest.  The money to be made
  from pictures w/ the Mascot is huge, especially if it goes back to the
  Grass Roots programs (Associations), where it should.  This is not an
  issue of youth participation numbers, as Mascot will not be at
  local/yocal meets (for the most part), but at Nationals where it will be
  an attraction piece.  For years it has been difficult to make TF fun
  for kids, this is a good step in that direction.  It just seems like
  another case where no matter what USATF does, people are going to
  crucify it.
 
  MJR
 


 =
 http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc.
 http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy TF
 
   @o  Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
 _/ \ \/\  (503)370-9969 phone/fax
/   /

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
 http://mailplus.yahoo.com




Re: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL

2003-01-07 Thread ghill
my guess is, Apocalypse didn't make it, since they're saying 5 finalists. If
Apoc. was the winner, the four finalists would be famine, pestilence...

 From: Bloomquist, Bret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Reply-To: Bloomquist, Bret [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 17:23:08 -0500
 To: 'Dan Kaplan' [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL
 
 The usatf website says voting for the finalists begins today. The longer
 this thread gets kicked around, the more impatient I am to find out the five
 finalists. Did Apocolypse make it?




RE: t-and-f: re: Mascot HEY JILL

2003-01-07 Thread Bloomquist, Bret
The usatf website says voting for the finalists begins today. The longer
this thread gets kicked around, the more impatient I am to find out the five
finalists. Did Apocolypse make it?

 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Kaplan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 11:17 PM
 To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:  Re: t-and-f: re: Mascot
 
  Mascots attract kids, there is no debating this,
  anything to the contrary is pointless banter.
 
 I take it that's your way of saying you can't support the statement?  I
 still haven't seen any evidence provided for the position that a mascot
 will directly help USATF financially.  We already know it's done a
 disservice to the organization in terms of negative publicity -- and no,
 that has absolutely nothing to do with no matter what USATF does, people
 are going to crucify it; it's simply an awful mascot -- so I'm assuming
 there has to be some market research indicating that that factor can be
 overcome by having pictures taken with kids.  Makes perfect sense.  Go
 after the people without money and alienate the paying customers who might
 even be participants.
 
 Dan
 
 --- Michael J. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The Mascot has an equal stupidity look, but kids don't know the 
  difference, so the point is moot.  Mascots attract kids, there is no 
  debating this, anything to the contrary is pointless banter.  Whether 
  the children are spectators or contestants (we're not talking Millrose 
  here, but JO meets for appearances) this is a positive financial 
  opportunity for USATF  TnF as a whole.  Kids will have something else 
  to remember outside of the events they contest.  The money to be made 
  from pictures w/ the Mascot is huge, especially if it goes back to the 
  Grass Roots programs (Associations), where it should.  This is not an 
  issue of youth participation numbers, as Mascot will not be at 
  local/yocal meets (for the most part), but at Nationals where it will be
  an attraction piece.  For years it has been difficult to make TF fun 
  for kids, this is a good step in that direction.  It just seems like 
  another case where no matter what USATF does, people are going to 
  crucify it.
  
  MJR
  
 
 
 =
 http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc.
 http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy TF
 
   @o  Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
 _/ \ \/\  (503)370-9969 phone/fax
/   /
 
 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
 http://mailplus.yahoo.com



t-and-f: re: Mascot

2003-01-06 Thread Michael J. Roth
The Mascot has an equal stupidity look, but kids don't know the 
difference, so the point is moot.  Mascots attract kids, there is no 
debating this, anything to the contrary is pointless banter.  Whether 
the children are spectators or contestants (we're not talking Millrose 
here, but JO meets for appearances) this is a positive financial 
opportunity for USATF  TnF as a whole.  Kids will have something else 
to remember outside of the events they contest.  The money to be made 
from pictures w/ the Mascot is huge, especially if it goes back to the 
Grass Roots programs (Associations), where it should.  This is not an 
issue of youth participation numbers, as Mascot will not be at 
local/yocal meets (for the most part), but at Nationals where it will be 
an attraction piece.  For years it has been difficult to make TF fun 
for kids, this is a good step in that direction.  It just seems like 
another case where no matter what USATF does, people are going to 
crucify it.

MJR



Re: t-and-f: re: Mascot

2003-01-06 Thread Dan Kaplan
 Mascots attract kids, there is no debating this,
 anything to the contrary is pointless banter.

I take it that's your way of saying you can't support the statement?  I
still haven't seen any evidence provided for the position that a mascot
will directly help USATF financially.  We already know it's done a
disservice to the organization in terms of negative publicity -- and no,
that has absolutely nothing to do with no matter what USATF does, people
are going to crucify it; it's simply an awful mascot -- so I'm assuming
there has to be some market research indicating that that factor can be
overcome by having pictures taken with kids.  Makes perfect sense.  Go
after the people without money and alienate the paying customers who might
even be participants.

Dan

--- Michael J. Roth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The Mascot has an equal stupidity look, but kids don't know the 
 difference, so the point is moot.  Mascots attract kids, there is no 
 debating this, anything to the contrary is pointless banter.  Whether 
 the children are spectators or contestants (we're not talking Millrose 
 here, but JO meets for appearances) this is a positive financial 
 opportunity for USATF  TnF as a whole.  Kids will have something else 
 to remember outside of the events they contest.  The money to be made 
 from pictures w/ the Mascot is huge, especially if it goes back to the 
 Grass Roots programs (Associations), where it should.  This is not an 
 issue of youth participation numbers, as Mascot will not be at 
 local/yocal meets (for the most part), but at Nationals where it will be
 an attraction piece.  For years it has been difficult to make TF fun 
 for kids, this is a good step in that direction.  It just seems like 
 another case where no matter what USATF does, people are going to 
 crucify it.
 
 MJR
 


=
http://AccountBiller.com - MyCalendar, D-Man, ReSearch, etc.
http://Run-Down.com - 10,000 Running Links, Fantasy TF

  @o  Dan Kaplan - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |\/ ^-  ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
_/ \ \/\  (503)370-9969 phone/fax
   /   /

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com