Re: [Tagging] Missing only_u_turn?
On 19-6-2011 4:21, Alan Mintz wrote: If not, how do I go about telling consumers about the change? 1. Use it. 2. Document it. 3. Write about it here. 4. Hope that e.g. the josm turn restriction plugin writers pick up on this and add it to their list. Or that they are asked to add it by users noticing the tag (1), finding it on the wiki (2), but find it missing from their $fav_editor. That last scenario is the most likely :) -- Lennard ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Missing only_u_turn?
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.netwrote: On the turn restrictions page, there is no mention of only_u_turn, yet I've found these to exist in the real world. Any objection to adding this restriction? If not, how do I go about telling consumers about the change? It sounds to me as distinctly odd - it would be a situation where at a crossing: * coming from A you only can go to A * coming from some other direction, there is another direction you can take (otherwise it could more easily be modeled with one-way roads instead of turn restrictions) Why would there be a way from A in the first place then? To me it would only make sense if the road 'from' A would actually be coming from another place than the road 'to' A would go through. And in that case, only_left_turn or only_right_turn would seem applicable. -- André Engels, andreeng...@gmail.com ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Missing only_u_turn?
On 6/18/2011 10:21 PM, Alan Mintz wrote: On the turn restrictions page, there is no mention of only_u_turn, yet I've found these to exist in the real world. I don't get it. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1630619/history is the only one you've added - can you really not continue east on Alessandro? (Aside: why the zigzagging? Intersections on divided highways should be represented as two nodes.) I'm also not clear on what source_ref = AM909_DSCX7666 mean. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Missing only_u_turn?
2011/6/19 Andre Engels andreeng...@gmail.com: And in that case, only_left_turn or only_right_turn would seem applicable. +1 cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Missing only_u_turn?
On 6/18/2011 10:21 PM, Alan Mintz wrote: On the turn restrictions page, there is no mention of only_u_turn, yet I've found these to exist in the real world. Any objection to adding this restriction? If not, how do I go about telling consumers about the change? Ignoring the question of whether there are any valid uses (trying to come up with one makes my brain hurt), shouldn't a router just see if the restriction=* value begins with no_ or only_? It doesn't need to know what kind of turn it is to parse the from and to ways; the only reason for that is if you want to render a sign. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
