Re: [Tagging] Which global OSM mailing list for the "community index"?
1. Although, just copying the archive may not seem to add too much value, I do see the potential improvement to the forum search index. However, it would be real useful if this transfer could be automated and turned into a kind of near-realtime sync. Then all you needed to implement is reverse sync to forward the replies given on the forum to the original mailing list. And by that we have created a single unified platform from two, previously disjoint ones! 2. Repeat for all platforms. 3. ??? 4. Profit!!! On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 8:06 AM Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Hi, > > On 28.06.19 04:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > Thoughts? > > Very bad idea, is my thought. Copying old threads to forums swamps the > forums, and gives people there old discussions to look at but in which > they cannot participate any more, as the authors of whatever arguments > you post will not be reading the forum. In my eyes, this plan treats the > forum as second-class and is disrespectful to its users. > > Bye > Frederik > > -- > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Which global OSM mailing list for the "community index"?
sent from a phone > Am 28.06.2019 um 08:15 schrieb Graeme Fitzpatrick : > > The idea was merely to keep all of the years discussions in one place are you aware there is a public mailing list archive? With some time and interest you could read it all, back to 2004 or so ;-) More seriously, what sometimes does not happen but could be useful is transferring the outcome of the discussions to the wiki. It’s not completely rare that there isn’t an undisputed consensus, but even if there is not, it could make sense to document that there isn’t, and to document the different arguments, and in general we could have a formal section in our wiki documentation where we link to the various instances of discussions about the tag (e.g. links to forum and ML discussions). Some topics have been dealt with various times. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] systematical mapping of waterways
28 Jun 2019, 10:52 by ulamm.b...@t-online.de: > In his explications of his ban against me > Please, stop offtopic posting on tagging mailing list. There is nothing about tagging here. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] systematical mapping of waterways
On 28/06/19 18:52, Ulrich Lamm wrote: This is not a tagging question. Suggest you take it to a German forum where local mappers may voice there ideas. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] systematical mapping of waterways
Hello, Le 28.06.19 à 10:52, Ulrich Lamm a écrit : > disappoval of the systematical mapping of waterways. your message does not contain any questions but if you want to know what others think about the systematic use of riverbank, wiki said : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Driverbank > which are wide enough to "require" mapping of distinct areas > For small rivers <...> if it is irregular as you do not give any examples, it is difficult to answer more usefully Regards, Marc ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] systematical mapping of waterways
Hello all! In his explications of his ban against me, user Woopeck wrote, "leider machst Du unbeirrt mit Deinen Wasserweg-Edits weiter. … Diese Edits sind unerwünscht." (You have unflinchingly continued with your waterway edits. … These edits are disapproved.) As, after my first ban, I have avoided any violations of ODB copyright, this sounds as if user Woodpeck's personal opinion is a general disappoval of the systematical mapping of waterways. Best regards Ulrich ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Which global OSM mailing list for the "community index"?
28 cze 2019, 08:15 od graemefi...@gmail.com: > change-over > Note that shutdown of mailing lists is not planned and is not likely to happen.___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Which global OSM mailing list for the "community index"?
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 16:06, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Very bad idea, is my thought. Copying old threads to forums swamps the > forums, and gives people there old discussions to look at but in which > they cannot participate any more, as the authors of whatever arguments > you post will not be reading the forum. In my eyes, this plan treats the > forum as second-class and is disrespectful to its users. > Sorry, no disrespect of any sort intended. The idea was merely to keep all of the years discussions in one place - same thing would be achieved by doing the change-over with effect 1/1/2020 - which is probably how long it would take to sort out all the issues involved! :-) Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Which global OSM mailing list for the "community index"?
Hi, On 28.06.19 04:14, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > Thoughts? Very bad idea, is my thought. Copying old threads to forums swamps the forums, and gives people there old discussions to look at but in which they cannot participate any more, as the authors of whatever arguments you post will not be reading the forum. In my eyes, this plan treats the forum as second-class and is disrespectful to its users. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
