[Tagging] .Re: tagging drinking water of unclear official (signed)
I dont know about the USA, but in British English, "portable" means that it can be carried. If you can drink it, it is "potable". >Message: 5 >Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 01:57:56 +0300 >From: 80hnhtv4a...@bk.ru >To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" > >Subject: Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking >water of uncleaer official (signed) status >Message-ID: ><1599433076.146027...@f540.i.mail.ru> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >in the united states we say (portable) >>Sunday, September 6, 2020 5:52 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer >>>: >> >> >> >>sent from a phone >> >>> On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < >>> tagging@openstreetmap.org > wrote: >>> >>> That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as >>> including >>> places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good >>> (examples >>> may include water fountains setup and maintained by city). >> >>why not use >>drinking_water=yes for these? >> >> >>Cheers Martin >> ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
sent from a phone > On 7. Sep 2020, at 01:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > Because I want to use drinking_water=yes and something indicating that there > is strong > reason to believe that water is drinkable do I understand you correctly that in your interpretation drinking_water:legal=yes does NOT give strong reason to believe it is drinkable water? Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
potable, and non potable, as in water lines separated in Florida. >Sunday, September 6, 2020 7:01 PM -05:00 from Philip Barnes >: > >On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 01:57 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote: >> in the united states we say (portable) >I suspect the US word is potable, same as GB. > >Phil (trigpoint) > > > >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
On Mon, 2020-09-07 at 01:57 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Tagging wrote: > in the united states we say (portable) I suspect the US word is potable, same as GB. Phil (trigpoint) ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 09:16, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > Sep 7, 2020, 00:52 by dieterdre...@gmail.com > > why not use > drinking_water=yes for these? > > Because I want to use drinking_water=yes and something indicating that > there is strong > reason to believe that water is drinkable. > Sorry, but to me, drinking_water=yes suggests that yes, this water is drinkable! :-) Thanks Graeme ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
Sep 7, 2020, 00:52 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging >> wrote: >> >> That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as >> including >> places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good >> (examples >> may include water fountains setup and maintained by city). >> > > > why not use > drinking_water=yes for these? > Because I want to use drinking_water=yes and something indicating that there is strong reason to believe that water is drinkable. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
in the united states we say (portable) >Sunday, September 6, 2020 5:52 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer >: > > > >sent from a phone > >> On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < >> tagging@openstreetmap.org > wrote: >> >> That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as >> including >> places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good >> (examples >> may include water fountains setup and maintained by city). > >why not use >drinking_water=yes for these? > > >Cheers Martin >___ >Tagging mailing list >Tagging@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
sent from a phone > On 6. Sep 2020, at 21:04, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as > including > places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good > (examples > may include water fountains setup and maintained by city). why not use drinking_water=yes for these? Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] [OSM-talk] maps/navigation data source
House numbers are also exhaustively complete in The Netherlands. Jo On Sat, Sep 5, 2020, 22:46 Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote: > Martin Koppenhoefer: > > > > > > sent from a phone > > > >> On 5. Sep 2020, at 16:43, ben.ki...@mail.de wrote: > >> > >> Which are the world regions OSM data is better in? Which are world > regions OSM data is equal good? > > > > > > generally urban areas and touristic monuments are covered, few countries > have good coverage in the country side, but there’s a lot to do everywhere, > it may also depend on the kind of data ;-) > > > > For example housenumbers are incomplete even in the most active > countries, > > > House numbers are complete in Denmark. They are imported from official > data. > > -- > Niels Elgaard Larsen > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] What is a proper way of mapping reedbed gowing od edge of the lake, within water?
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 05:11, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <
tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> natural=wetland wetland=reedbed area within natural=water area?
>
> JOSM complains about this ("water area within water area") but
> such tagging seems fine to me.
>
That should be fine.
Have done similar with sandbanks etc previously & they've worked :-)
Thanks
Graeme
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] What is a proper way of mapping reedbed gowing od edge of the lake, within water?
natural=wetland wetland=reedbed area within natural=water area?
JOSM complains about this ("water area within water area") but
such tagging seems fine to me.
See https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/844830821
for an example
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
That redefines drinking_water:legal=yes which currently is described as including places where status is not explicitly signed but is known to be good (examples may include water fountains setup and maintained by city). Sep 6, 2020, 20:39 by europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com: > if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer Paul‘s > suggestion: > drinking_water:legal=unsigned> > > +1 > > I also agree that this is a good suggestion > > On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 20:34, Martin Koppenhoefer <> dieterdre...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> >> >> sent from a phone >> >> > On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <>> >> tagging@openstreetmap.org>> > wrote: >> > >> > I will use drinking_water:legal=unknown >> >> >> if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer >> Paul‘s suggestion: >> drinking_water:legal=unsigned >> ___ >> Tagging mailing list >> >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer Paul‘s suggestion: drinking_water:legal=unsigned +1 I also agree that this is a good suggestion On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 20:34, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < > tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > I will use drinking_water:legal=unknown > > > if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer > Paul‘s suggestion: > drinking_water:legal=unsigned > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
sent from a phone > On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > I will use drinking_water:legal=unknown if drinking_water:legal is about the content of a sign, I would prefer Paul‘s suggestion: drinking_water:legal=unsigned ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
sent from a phone > On 6. Sep 2020, at 16:21, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging > wrote: > > may be also unsigned, but it may be clearly coming from drinkable tap water the water could be contaminated at the end of it’s journey (conduits), and not be suggested to drink although the general tap water quality of the area is good. Cheers Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
Sep 6, 2020, 15:51 by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 14:17, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> >> drinking_water:signed=no ? >> > > Ambiguous. It might have a sign that says nothing about the legality. > > drinking_water:legal=unsigned? > drinking_water:legal=unknown? > "drinking_water:legal=yes - The water is checked and approved by public authorities." may be also unsigned, but it may be clearly coming from drinkable tap water I will use drinking_water:legal=unknown ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
On Sun, 6 Sep 2020 at 14:17, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > drinking_water:signed=no ? > Ambiguous. It might have a sign that says nothing about the legality. drinking_water:legal=unsigned? drinking_water:legal=unknown? -- Paul ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] tagging drinking water of uncleaer official (signed) status
We have drinking_water:legal=yes for water that is officially drinkable, we have drinking_water:legal=no for water signed as not drinkable. Do we have tag for water sources (amenity=drinking_water, drinking_water=yes) that are neither officially or signably drinkable nor with "not drinkable sign"? drinking_water:signed=no ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
