[Tagging] Bannered/Special routes (Business, Alternate, etc.) in ref tags

2018-04-12 Thread Albert Pundt
Sometimes bannered routes like business and alternate routes are tagged
with, for example, ref=US 1 Business, spelling it out fully, and other
times they abbreviate it, e.g. ref=US 1 Alt. Which is considered the best
practice? We already abbreviate the US, I, etc., so it's not a stretch to
abbreviate the banner word as well. And while we shouldn't tag only for the
renderer, it also has the advantage of not being too long for the current
Carto style.

—Albert
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


Re: [Tagging] Bannered/Special routes (Business, Alternate, etc.) in ref tags

2018-04-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 10:48 PM, Albert Pundt  wrote:

> Sometimes bannered routes like business and alternate routes are tagged
> with, for example, ref=US 1 Business, spelling it out fully, and other
> times they abbreviate it, e.g. ref=US 1 Alt. Which is considered the best
> practice? We already abbreviate the US, I, etc., so it's not a stretch to
> abbreviate the banner word as well. And while we shouldn't tag only for the
> renderer, it also has the advantage of not being too long for the current
> Carto style.
>

I would generally go without abbreviation, eg, ref=US 1 Alternate, though
in the long term, I really think it's long overdue to kill the dinosaur of
tagging refs for routes on ways and just describe routes via relations, in
which case, the relation would be...

relation=route
route=road
network=US:US:Alternate
ref=1
modifier=Alternate

In the interim, do both for now.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging