[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key
Hi all. I have proposed the start of the roller_coaster key as way to standardise on tagging of roller coaster features. Especially now we're getting details enough to be able to include this extra information. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/key:roller_coaster The initial proposal is just for the track and station values but other values will be valid. Any and all comments and feedback are welcome on the talk page http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/key:roller_coaster Many thanks (Resent as my original on 2012/12/10 doesn't seem to have been approved) -- Deanna Earley (d...@earlsoft.co.uk) web:http://www.earlsoft.co.uk phone: +44 (0)780 8369596 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key
Good start :-) One point that jumps to mind: I would imagine that you will find the "layer=*" tag to be better than "level=*". All the best, Rob ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote: > One point that jumps to mind: I would imagine that you will find the > "layer=*" tag to be better than "level=*". +1 __John ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - roller_coaster key
On 11/01/2013 14:38, John Sturdy wrote: On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Rob Nickerson wrote: One point that jumps to mind: I would imagine that you will find the "layer=*" tag to be better than "level=*". +1 Sorted, thanks. -- Deanna Earley (d...@earlsoft.co.uk) web:http://www.earlsoft.co.uk phone: +44 (0)780 8369596 ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
