Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 63

[Warin]

On 15/02/19 00:36, Ulrich Lamm wrote:
Am 14.02.2019 um 12:51 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org 
:



 If you can justify it within your own tortured logic about
copyright, you can even use the
OSM database as a foundation for your efforts.


Openstreetmap is present, almost everywhere.
On some kinds of contents, Openstreetmap is full of of gaps and mistakes.
One has the choice to accept that like a fate, or to try to improve 
Openstreetmap.


Improvement in detail is filling gaps and correcting mistakes.
Improvement in principle is pleading for rules that do not prevent 
scientific standard

and supporting a development of OSM's social structures towards democracy.


OSM is constrained by making the output data really and truly free for 
all users.


What you are trying to do will restrict the output data of OSM.

Is that an 'improvement'?

--

Deal with the principle issue. Errors/mistakes/accuracy and added data 
are side issues.


-
If someone does not want to see the messages of one or more contributors 
they are free to do so.  Just as they are free not to read a thread.


Ulrich  contributions break the social norms by using the digest as the 
subject title thus breaking any possibility to organise the threads into 
a sequence.

This is unsocial to all.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Tagging Digest, Vol 113, Issue 63

[Ulrich Lamm]

Am 14.02.2019 um 12:51 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:

>  If you can justify it within your own tortured logic about
> copyright, you can even use the
> OSM database as a foundation for your efforts.

Openstreetmap is present, almost everywhere.
On some kinds of contents, Openstreetmap is full of of gaps and mistakes.
One has the choice to accept that like a fate, or to try to improve 
Openstreetmap.

Improvement in detail is filling gaps and correcting mistakes.
Improvement in principle is pleading for rules that do not prevent scientific 
standard
and supporting a development of OSM's social structures towards democracy.

If some people forbid entries of scientific state of the art, unless they are 
allowed to sell them, this prevents OSM from becoming reliable.
It is not acceptable, if errors persist, because the sell better than the truth.

 
 ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging