Re: [Tagging] Shared foot- and cycletracks

[Mateusz Konieczny]

Please, stop proposing tags conflicting with widely used ones.

Also, your example with Poland is incorrect (pedestrians have priority over
cyclists).

2014-12-28 18:35 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm :

> Hi mapping and cycling friends,
>
> I have suggested a special highway-class for the slim tagging of this very
> common kind of cycling facilities that up to now affords a combination of
> four tags.
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/foot_cycleway
>
> Yours'
> Ulrich
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Shared foot- and cycletracks

[fly]

Do not see any advantage compared to highway=path with proper access-tags.

Am 28.12.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
> Please, stop proposing tags conflicting with widely used ones.
> 
> Also, your example with Poland is incorrect (pedestrians have priority
> over cyclists).

+1

Same in Germany

cu fly

> 2014-12-28 18:35 GMT+01:00 Ulrich Lamm  >:
> 
> Hi mapping and cycling friends,
> 
> I have suggested a special highway-class for the slim tagging of
> this very common kind of cycling facilities that up to now affords a
> combination of four tags.
> 
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/foot_cycleway
> 
> Yours'
> Ulrich
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org 
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 


___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging