Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
2012/9/14 Pieren : > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote: >> This list of animals should be used in case of specialized vets > > Then you could create a subtag like > vet_speciality=companion_animals/livestock/zoo_animals/horses/surgery/dermatology/internal_medicine This could be a useful refinement but I would not mix animals and other specializations. Especially as a specialization on certain animals is much more common than a specialization on e.g. dermatology among vets. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote: > This list of animals should be used in case of specialized vets Then you could create a subtag like vet_speciality=companion_animals/livestock/zoo_animals/horses/surgery/dermatology/internal_medicine Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
2012/9/14 Pieren : > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote: > >> I hereby propose to remove all amenity=hospitals and amenity=clinic >> from the OSM database and replace everything with amenity=doctors and >> phone=xxx. > > My proposal was not about the size (legitimate question) but more > about the list of animals. It reminds me this proposal: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Beer_details This list of animals should be used in case of specialized vets, e.g. some vets only treat horses. Or to put it the other way around: there should NOT be a list like veterinary:for:hamster=yes, veterinary:for:mouse=yes, veterinary:for:rabbit=yes, . ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Martin Vonwald wrote: > I hereby propose to remove all amenity=hospitals and amenity=clinic > from the OSM database and replace everything with amenity=doctors and > phone=xxx. My proposal was not about the size (legitimate question) but more about the list of animals. It reminds me this proposal: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Beer_details Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
2012/9/14 Chris Hill : > On 14/09/12 10:58, Pieren wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Martin Vonwald >> wrote: >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >> I think that the tag "phone=" is enough: >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Phone >> >> > +1 I hereby propose to remove all amenity=hospitals and amenity=clinic from the OSM database and replace everything with amenity=doctors and phone=xxx. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
On 14/09/12 10:58, Pieren wrote: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote: What do you think? I think that the tag "phone=" is enough: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Phone +1 -- Cheers, Chris user: chillly ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
2012/9/14 Martin Vonwald : > 2012/9/14 Philip Barnes : >> Doctor should not be used, that implies treatment of humans. A person >> qualified to treat animals is a Vet, or Veterinary Surgeon. > > Good point. What value would you suggest for a veterinary, where only > one person treats animals? Would "practice" fit? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
2012/9/14 Pieren : > I think that the tag "phone=" is enough: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Phone Thank you. Any other opinions? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
2012/9/14 Philip Barnes : > Doctor should not be used, that implies treatment of humans. A person > qualified to treat animals is a Vet, or Veterinary Surgeon. Good point. What value would you suggest for a veterinary, where only one person treats animals? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Martin Vonwald wrote: > > What do you think? > I think that the tag "phone=" is enough: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Phone Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] amenity=veterinary: size and animals
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 11:22 +0200, Martin Vonwald wrote: > Hi! > > The tag amenity=veterinary is used for veterinaries. But there exists > not (documented) possibility to tag the size of the facility or what > animals are treated. Taginfo shows that a very limited time the size > was tagged with veterinary=hospital. I would suggest the following: > * veterinary=doctor/clinic/hospital > * veterinary:for=; or alternatively > veterinary:for:=yes/no > > An alternative to veterinary= would be veterinary:size=. > > What do you think? Doctor should not be used, that implies treatment of humans. A person qualified to treat animals is a Vet, or Veterinary Surgeon. Phil ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
