Re: [Tails-dev] Please test and merge feature-torbrowser APT suite
03/11/12 16:53, intrigeri wrote: Hi, nothing new in Git on this front, so this is a pure APT merge request: $ reprepro ls iceweasel iceweasel | 10.0.9esr-1+tails1 | devel | i386, source iceweasel | 10.0.10esr-1+tails1 | experimental | i386, source iceweasel | 10.0.10esr-1+tails1 | feature-torbrowser | i386, source iceweasel | 10.0.9esr-1+tails1 | testing | i386, source Please test and merge the feature-torbrowser APT suite into testing and devel. Worked fine for me when I quickly tested it within Tails, and I'm using another binary build of that source package as my regular browser for a few days. Done. However, there were permission problems, so I had to manually `chmod a+r` all files in `pool/main/i/iceweasel/`. After that I successfully built testing and got a seemingly working iceweasel upgraded to esr10. Great! Cheers! ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] forking Tails documentation pages credit
Hi, I plan to fork a few Tails documentation pages. For example the warning page: https://tails.boum.org/doc/about/warning/index.en.html The majority of points applies to any Tor based projects, Tails, Liberte Linux, TBB, Whonix. For example Tor doesn't protect you from a global adversary, Confirmation attacks, etc. apply to all projects. I hate to fork it, but I don't know a better solution which allows cooperation. There are some pros, cons, ideas about general guide to anonymity, and obstacles in my mind but no practical and suitable proposal for a shared documentation project and I want to keep this mail relatively short. The torproject.org wiki is not really suited. It doesn't support multiple languages and from experience I can say torproject's time is very limited. Long story, short question: To properly give credit and honor the license, is it okay to write the following on the top? Or do you prefer something else for credit? This page is a fork/is based on/contains part of the [Tails warning page](https://tails.boum.org/doc/about/warning/index.en.html), which is under GPLv3.) Cheers, adrelanos ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] Call for testing 0.14~rc2
Note for the one who manages the release: we need to make sure the final ISO does not get the latest live-config (3.0.9-1): it has basically nothing useful for us, and it migrates to new paths brought by live-boot 3.0~b7, which we're not ready for yet (details: todo/newer_live-boot). ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
Re: [Tails-dev] [tor-dev] Working on GUI
Hi, Damian Johnson wrote (06 Nov 2012 23:31:02 GMT) : Runa A. Sandvik wrote (06 Nov 2012 22:44:03 GMT) : Actually, both Tails and the Tor Browser Bundle could benefit from a usability study. Thank you, Runa, for mentioning Tails here. Usability studies only help if there's development resources to make the suggestions happen. Mike and Tails should be the ones to make the call about if they have the bandwidth to take advantage of a usability study or not. A part of Tails that we know does need usability improvements is the tails-greeter boot menu (ticket [1]). [1] https://tails.boum.org/todo/tails-greeter:_revamp_UI/ Some thought was given to it, and a few mockups [2] were produced. This is probably not enough foundations for a proper usability study, but it shows we do want to revamp that thing with usability in mind, and at least one of us is up to development work on it. [2] https://mailman.boum.org/pipermail/tails-dev/2012-October/001781.html I'm unsure if any one of us has the bandwidth needed to take advantage of a full-blown usability study, but that's clearly worth proposing and discussing. I'm thus Cc'ing tails-dev to initiate the discussion there. (Side note: we've also had some bolder and crazier ideas that are still to be written clearly somewhere public (e.g. integrate the persistence setup within the greeter, allow persisting some greeter settings), and may be worth integrating in a usability study, whose scale would get much bigger, though.) Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
