Re: [Tails-dev] Cannot install Tor Browser in Tails 2.0 build
ceyx wrote (01 Feb 2016 20:32:33 GMT) : > The customer needs some of his preferred IM settings in $HOME/.purple/ . > That's > about it. Please make sure you're aware of: https://tails.boum.org/contribute/derivatives/ See in particular the part about automatic upgrades. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Cannot install Tor Browser in Tails 2.0 build
ceyx wrote (01 Feb 2016 20:22:55 GMT) : > No, it's the manual build and I did not configure a proxy. OK. I think I've seen/heard before that our build system might be broken when one doesn't use a HTTP proxy => I suggest you retry with one configured. Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] (review) muri-doc/installer-sc-fix
Muri Nicanor: > the desktop screenshot on the upgrade page still shows a wheezy gnome, i > replaced the desktop.png with a screenshot of a tails 2.0. > > Based on commit ef6b6c0e3b2f49c232c7ef7bd2d1e6f8f436fe12: > > Revert "Try to force our website to update the torrent link." > (2016-01-27 02:46:57 +0100) > > i created a branch in the git repository at: > > https://gitlab.com/muri/tails.git muri-doc/installer-sc-fix > > for you to review changes up to 2348c3c7abf3b14a2881edfdf15f0e7ee7ce4d7f: > > replaced desktop.png with a 2.0. version (2016-01-27 11:11:36 +0100) Good catch! It's fixed now. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] (review) muri-doc/new-sigingin-key-fix-date
Muri Nicanor: > on the signing key transition page > (https://tails.boum.org/news/signing_key_transition/) the 'full > description' of the (then) new signing key still mentions the old > expiration date. i'm not sure if we should change that, but at least one > user was confused by that... I'm not super happy in principle to rewrite history like this (in this case something in /news) but here I think it's ok. So: merged! ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Cannot install Tor Browser in Tails 2.0 build
hi On 02/02/2016 02:04 PM, intrigeri wrote: > ceyx wrote (01 Feb 2016 20:22:55 GMT) : >> No, it's the manual build and I did not configure a proxy. > > OK. I think I've seen/heard before that our build system might be > broken when one doesn't use a HTTP proxy => I suggest you retry with > one configured. i can confirm this, i had also trouble with the torbrowser installation but using > lb config --apt-http-proxy http://localhost:3142 (after installing apt-cacher-ng) it worked cheers, muri > > Cheers, > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] (review) muri-doc/new-sigingin-key-fix-date
sajolida wrote (02 Feb 2016 15:17:13 GMT) : > I'm not super happy in principle to rewrite history like this (in this > case something in /news) but here I think it's ok. Yes, especially since this specific piece of news is actually pointed to from various places of our doc :) ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Cannot install Tor Browser in Tails 2.0 build
Muri Nicanor wrote (02 Feb 2016 16:22:24 GMT) : > i can confirm this, i had also trouble with the torbrowser installation > but using >> lb config --apt-http-proxy http://localhost:3142 > (after installing apt-cacher-ng) it worked If you, or anyone else, had some time to file a ticket about it, and/or propose a branch that fixes the manual build doc, this would be awesome! ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] New User questions
Hello i will be soon new user of Tails. i hope its secure to use it. i have some questions . FIRST. how can i SSH into remote VPS over TorSocks5 ? in Windows i use Putty very small SSH client and it can be configured with proxy. SECOND. how can i Trasfer files into remote VPS over TorSocks5 ? in windows i use FileZilla small SFTP client and it can be configured with proxy. so exist similar softwares in Tails? if not can in next version of 2march implement this 2small but very good Tools ! last question: how can i create persistent folder ? if i have USB of 22gb and Tails use only 2GB can i use some space to save files ? ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Cannot install Tor Browser in Tails 2.0 build
Muri Nicanor: On 02/02/2016 02:04 PM, intrigeri wrote: ceyx wrote (01 Feb 2016 20:22:55 GMT) : No, it's the manual build and I did not configure a proxy. OK. I think I've seen/heard before that our build system might be broken when one doesn't use a HTTP proxy => I suggest you retry with one configured. i can confirm this, i had also trouble with the torbrowser installation but using lb config --apt-http-proxy http://localhost:3142 (after installing apt-cacher-ng) it worked Solution confirmed. Thank you guys a lot! -- ceyx ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] Cannot install Tor Browser in Tails 2.0 build
On 02/02/2016 07:16 PM, intrigeri wrote: > Muri Nicanor wrote (02 Feb 2016 16:22:24 GMT) : >> i can confirm this, i had also trouble with the torbrowser installation >> but using >>> lb config --apt-http-proxy http://localhost:3142 >> (after installing apt-cacher-ng) it worked > > If you, or anyone else, had some time to file a ticket about it, > and/or propose a branch that fixes the manual build doc, this would be > awesome! filed #11046, but i don't think that i can fix that, as i'm pretty unacquainted with live-build... cheers, muri > ___ > Tails-dev mailing list > Tails-dev@boum.org > https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev > To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to > tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org. > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] ebuild for tails-installer
On Feb 1, 2016 6:33 PM, wrote: > > In gentoo, there are essentially three ways to install a package through the > package manager: > > 1) Packages that are included in the main portage tree (that would be the > official packages of the distro) > 2) Packages included in one of the layman overlays (would be like thirthd > party repos, but can be easily managed with a tool provided by the distro). > 3) Packages in the local overlay of the user (would be the equivalent of > downloading a .deb package and install it manually). > > I have no contact with the official gentoo team, so can't do much about option > 1). However, Austin English, who also showed interest in this, might help with > that. AFAIK, he is on hollyday now. Maybe when he comes back he could help Yes, I am, but I've got a few minutes to reply. I'm in the process of becoming a Gentoo developer myself, and child commit it at that point, or I have other contacts that may be willing. > with that. If this get fixed, gentoo users that want to install tails-installer > should just use the standard way: > > $ emerge tails-installer > > and that would be it (well, maybe some work should be done to allow the > installation of a package that is not marked as fully stable, but that is the > kind of things that a typical gentoo user is used to deal with) Yes, but unfortunately this package could never be stable, as it's a - (for non Gentoo people, that refers to live/trunk ebuilds rather than one that is tied to a specific version). It would be extremely helpful if source tarballs were available at Tails upstream for each release. That would allow Gentoo upstream to stabilize known good versions after a period of testing. > About option 2), I also don't maintain any of those semioficial overlays. > However, one of those overlays is focused preciselly on torbrowser and related > packages. I have already sent a pull request to include my ebuild in it. If it > is merged, the installation would be almost as easy. Just install the layman > tool in the usual way and then: > > $ layman -a torbrowser > $ emerge tails-installer > > Finally, until 1) and/or 2) become possible, a regular user can use a local > overlay. In order to do so, (s)he should follow the following steps: > > a) enable the local overlay by adding a line like > > PORTDIR_OVERLAY = "/usr/local/portage/" > > to the file /etc/portage/make.conf > > b) copy the directory tails-installer and its content inside of the directory > /usr/local/portage/app-misc > > c) run the usual "emerge tails-installer" command. > > I hope this helps to clarify the general picture. If you need more details, I > would be happy to provide them. > > > P.S. During the writing of the ebuild I noticed that there are several > dependencies that are not listed in the README file. They are the following: > > configobj > urlgrabber > python-distutils-extra > pygobject > pyparted > cdrtools > gptfdisk > > > best, > > Miguel Marco > > > > > > > > Miguel Angel Marco Buzunariz: > > > I have uploaded the ebuild to > > > https://github.com/miguelmarco/tails-installer-ebuild > > > > > > If someone has access to a gentoo box, please test it. > > > > > > If furthermore someone maintains a gentoo overlay, or any other place were > > > it > > > makes sense to offer an ebuild, please feel free to include it. > > > > Hi Miguel, > > > > I never used Gentoo myself so I won't be able to test this. > > > > But I wrote the new set of installation instructions [1] and I wonder > > when and how we should document tails-installer for Gentoo in there. > > > > So, what would be the process for the official inclusion of > > tails-installer in Gentoo? What needs to happen before a regular Gentoo > > user can use your work? > > > > Once this happen, I'd like to get some basic instructions so I can maybe > > test this in a Gentoo live CD and then I'll propose something to > > document this in [1]. > > > > [1]: https://tails.boum.org/install/ > ___ > Tails-dev mailing list > Tails-dev@boum.org > https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev > To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
