Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
> So, to clarify: now that u. has validated that this branch reaches its > goal, it still needs to be reviewed and merged for 1.5. Any taker? > Merged, thanks! ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
So, to clarify: now that u. has validated that this branch reaches its goal, it still needs to be reviewed and merged for 1.5. Any taker? Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
> Cool, thanks! In what environment, exactly? (Jessie? sid? both?) Oops, sorry for the noise: this info was provided on the ticket. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
intrigeri: > u wrote (16 Jun 2015 12:28:36 GMT) : >> I simply modified line 1008 in >> /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/liveusb/creator.py (derived from the >> feature_jessie branch) using "syslinux-amd64" and the latest >> experimental ISO and it works! Yay \o/ > > Cool, thanks! In what environment, exactly? (Jessie? sid? both?) Sorry for not providing this information. I tested this on Jessie only. Cheers u. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
u wrote (16 Jun 2015 12:28:36 GMT) : > I simply modified line 1008 in > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/liveusb/creator.py (derived from the > feature_jessie branch) using "syslinux-amd64" and the latest > experimental ISO and it works! Yay \o/ Cool, thanks! In what environment, exactly? (Jessie? sid? both?) ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
Re: [Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
Hey, > u.: it would be awesome if you quickly (and possibly hackishly) > patched Tails Installer to make it use utils/linux/syslinux-amd64 > instead of utils/linux/syslinux, and tested that on an amd64 Jessie or > sid system. I'm not sure if that filename will work, for example (it > might be that some lame iso9660 restriction applies here). If it > doesn't work due to file naming, perhaps try syslinux.64 and syslin64, > surely one of those will work :) I simply modified line 1008 in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/liveusb/creator.py (derived from the feature_jessie branch) using "syslinux-amd64" and the latest experimental ISO and it works! Yay \o/ Cheers u. ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
[Tails-dev] [review'n'merge:1.5] feature/9381-ship-amd64-syslinux
Hi, as you may know already, Tails Installer uses the syslinux binary shipped in our ISO, so that the version of the syslinux modules we install match the version of the syslinux binary being used. Given this, once Tails Installer is in Debian/Ubuntu, we'll need to have an amd64 syslinux binary in our ISO filesystem, otherwise Tails Installer won't work on amd64 installations. The proposed branch implements that => please review'n'merge into devel. u.: it would be awesome if you quickly (and possibly hackishly) patched Tails Installer to make it use utils/linux/syslinux-amd64 instead of utils/linux/syslinux, and tested that on an amd64 Jessie or sid system. I'm not sure if that filename will work, for example (it might be that some lame iso9660 restriction applies here). If it doesn't work due to file naming, perhaps try syslinux.64 and syslin64, surely one of those will work :) Cheers, -- intrigeri ___ Tails-dev mailing list Tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev To unsubscribe from this list, send an empty email to tails-dev-unsubscr...@boum.org.
