Re: [Tails-dev] Dependencies between persistence options
hi, Ague Mill wrote (16 Oct 2012 07:39:43 GMT) : > Would it be the only option to benefit from such feature? Is there > other in the radar or on anyone's mind? AFAICT, no todo/persistence_preset_-_* involves inter-dependencies. So, I propose we keep the current documentation + simple UI, and revisit this question later, iff. more persistence presets involving inter-dependencies appear. Cheers, -- intrigeri | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev
[Tails-dev] Dependencies between persistence options
Hi! While testing persistent Network Manager connections in the field, I got bitten by the fact that I had not enabled GNOME Keyring at the same time. I hardly see an interesting case where someone would not want to enable both at the same time. Fixing this user experience issue would, on first thoughts, require adding support for dependencies between options in tails-persistence-setup. This would probably make at least the UI more complex (only example I can think about is Synaptic). Would it be the only option to benefit from such feature? Is there other in the radar or on anyone's mind? -- Ague pgpshyuz47sJe.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ tails-dev mailing list tails-dev@boum.org https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev