Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/torbutton-1.6.5.1

2013-12-12 Thread intrigeri
Hi,

berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote (12 Dec 2013 16:35:49 GMT) :
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:13:45PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> feature/torbutton-1.6.5.1 brings the latest Torbutton in. It fixes
>> a bug in the New Identity feature, that we lack, but I expect we'll
>> need an even newer version anyway for 0.22.1 or something, so let's
>> merge incrementally and detect issues ASAP.
>> 
>> Please review'n'merge into devel (not testing, IMHO it's not worth
>> it). bertagaz volunteered to take care of it.

> Merged into APT, [...]

Thank you.

> Shall I merge into testing and experimental too, now that the release has
> been done?

Into testing: no. We only use testing during freezes.
Into experimental: I just did it. Sorry, it was my duty to do it
before requesting a merge.

Cheers,
-- 
  intrigeri
  | GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
  | OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev


Re: [Tails-dev] Please review'n'merge feature/torbutton-1.6.5.1

2013-12-12 Thread bertagaz
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 03:13:45PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> feature/torbutton-1.6.5.1 brings the latest Torbutton in. It fixes
> a bug in the New Identity feature, that we lack, but I expect we'll
> need an even newer version anyway for 0.22.1 or something, so let's
> merge incrementally and detect issues ASAP.
> 
> Please review'n'merge into devel (not testing, IMHO it's not worth
> it). bertagaz volunteered to take care of it.

Merged into APT, but git refused to merge it in devel, already up-to-date
it says, surprisingly. :)

Shall I merge into testing and experimental too, now that the release has
been done?

bert.
___
tails-dev mailing list
tails-dev@boum.org
https://mailman.boum.org/listinfo/tails-dev