Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my
Hi! Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > > Even that would constitute part of a policy > That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) bye Nop -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/paths-and-roads-and-approval-oh-my-tp5913440p5917575.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my
On 13 January 2011 19:17, NopMap wrote: > That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) It's either policy or just someone's opinion, can't be both... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my
Hi! JohnSmitty wrote: > > On 13 January 2011 19:17, NopMap wrote: >> That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) > > It's either policy or just someone's opinion, can't be both... > Regardless of how democratically minded you are feeling, there are things in the universe that you cannot vote on. :-) bye Nop -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/paths-and-roads-and-approval-oh-my-tp5913440p5918759.html Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my
What is it you two are arguing about? On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 11:13 AM, NopMap wrote: > > > Hi! > > > JohnSmitty wrote: >> >> On 13 January 2011 19:17, NopMap wrote: >>> That's not a policy but an immutable fact. :-) >> >> It's either policy or just someone's opinion, can't be both... >> > > Regardless of how democratically minded you are feeling, > there are things in the universe that you cannot vote on. :-) > > bye > Nop > > -- > View this message in context: > http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/paths-and-roads-and-approval-oh-my-tp5913440p5918759.html > Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM Fork] paths and roads and approval, oh my
On 14 January 2011 07:28, Anthony wrote: > What is it you two are arguing about? NopMap is making the assertion that tags can't be altered once they start being used, but this isn't the case since abutters etc have already been deprecated in favour of other mapping methods/techniques. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
