Re: [OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers
On 17/01/2016 3:41 AM, Steve Doerr wrote: On 08/01/2016 22:34, Simon Poole wrote: Am 08.01.2016 um 23:25 schrieb tony wroblewski: Silly question, why would you trace from Mapnik, since it's OSM anyway? I use it to check the OSM data relative to another image without down loading the data ... So I am not tracing but visual error/accuracy/missing checks. There are many reasons why you might want to use a non-imagery background (or overlay which essentially all have gone too), for example large scale orientation or highlighting specific features, editing in areas without useful areial imagery and so on. Simon Yes, indeed. So, could we have our background layers back, please? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Missing Background Layers
On 08/01/2016 22:34, Simon Poole wrote: Am 08.01.2016 um 23:25 schrieb tony wroblewski: Silly question, why would you trace from Mapnik, since it's OSM anyway? There are many reasons why you might want to use a non-imagery background (or overlay which essentially all have gone too), for example large scale orientation or highlighting specific features, editing in areas without useful areial imagery and so on. Simon Yes, indeed. So, could we have our background layers back, please? -- Steve --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
