[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #398 2018-02-27-2018-03-05-
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 398, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10092/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages where?: https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/weeklyosm-is-currently-produced-in_56718#2/8.6/108.3 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM SPAM detector
is that the reason for that? This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: tagg...@openstreetmap.org: SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host: a.mx.openstreetmap.org (212.110.172.32) reason: 550-Rejected because 82.165.159.14 is in a black list at zen.spamhaus.org 550https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647 could not send mails to tagging for 2 days. walter Am 05.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Jason Remillard: Hi, This weekend I put together a SPAM detector for OSM changesets. https://github.com/jremillard/osm-changeset-classification You don't need to be a developer to contribute, send over any SPAM'y changesets you come across via a github issue, a pull request, or even an email to me. I just need the changeset id. The code is currently hitting 99+% accuracy detecting the difference between 1500 random normal edits and 1500 sketchy changesets that Fredrick shared with the talk-us last last week. This is with zero tuning, so it looks like it will work well. Jason ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM SPAM detector
Hi Walter, No, the subject of this thread about spam related to OSM changesets, it has nothing to do with email. Your rejection notice is because it seems OSM's email servers make use of a service that "block lists" other email servers that have an alleged reputation of sending spam. However you send your emails, they are being sent through a server that is on that block list and therefor OSM's email servers refuse to accept it or any emails that come from your email provider's servers. Following the link in the message you included provides more information: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647 Regards, blake On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Walter Nordmann wrote: > is that the reason for that? > > This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. > > A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of > its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) > failed: > > tagg...@openstreetmap.org: > SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host: > a.mx.openstreetmap.org (212.110.172.32) reason: 550-Rejected because > 82.165.159.14 is in a black list at zen.spamhaus.org > 550 https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647 > > could not send mails to tagging for 2 days. > walter > > Am 05.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Jason Remillard: > > Hi, > > This weekend I put together a SPAM detector for OSM changesets. > > https://github.com/jremillard/osm-changeset-classification > > You don't need to be a developer to contribute, send over any SPAM'y > changesets you come across via a github issue, a pull request, or even an > email to me. I just need the changeset id. > > The code is currently hitting 99+% accuracy detecting the difference between > 1500 random normal edits and 1500 sketchy changesets that Fredrick shared > with the talk-us last last week. This is with zero tuning, so it looks like > it will work well. > > Jason > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > -- Blake Girardot OSM Wiki - https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Bgirardot HOTOSM Member - https://hotosm.org/users/blake_girardot skype: jblakegirardot ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] OSM SPAM detector
Hi Blake, yes, I messed up something. :( saturday morning i asked my mail provider to fix that problem, but they didn't do anything. it's weekend :( time to change the provider. Regards walter Am 11.03.2018 um 01:33 schrieb Blake Girardot: Hi Walter, No, the subject of this thread about spam related to OSM changesets, it has nothing to do with email. Your rejection notice is because it seems OSM's email servers make use of a service that "block lists" other email servers that have an alleged reputation of sending spam. However you send your emails, they are being sent through a server that is on that block list and therefor OSM's email servers refuse to accept it or any emails that come from your email provider's servers. Following the link in the message you included provides more information: https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647 Regards, blake On Sat, Mar 10, 2018 at 7:54 PM, Walter Nordmann wrote: is that the reason for that? This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: tagg...@openstreetmap.org: SMTP error from remote server for RCPT TO command, host: a.mx.openstreetmap.org (212.110.172.32) reason: 550-Rejected because 82.165.159.14 is in a black list at zen.spamhaus.org 550 https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL229647 could not send mails to tagging for 2 days. walter Am 05.03.2018 um 15:06 schrieb Jason Remillard: Hi, This weekend I put together a SPAM detector for OSM changesets. https://github.com/jremillard/osm-changeset-classification You don't need to be a developer to contribute, send over any SPAM'y changesets you come across via a github issue, a pull request, or even an email to me. I just need the changeset id. The code is currently hitting 99+% accuracy detecting the difference between 1500 random normal edits and 1500 sketchy changesets that Fredrick shared with the talk-us last last week. This is with zero tuning, so it looks like it will work well. Jason ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk