Re: [OSM-talk] OSM based mobile app that allows additional vector data to be loaded

[Simon Poole]

A couple of months later ...


The upcoming release of Vespucci (version 11) has support for displaying
geojson as a layer. The current beta release is available from the
google playstore (and our github repository
https://github.com/MarcusWolschon/osmeditor4android/releases).


Simon


Am 17.03.2018 um 14:01 schrieb Simon Poole:
>
>
> Naturally you can load gps files (with way points) in Vespucci too,
> but probably more relevant to the question: you can load custom task
> files a simplified OSMOSE format. Low priority I've been thinking of
> adding a "GIS data" layer support, I'm just not quite sure the use
> case really exists.
>
>
> Simon
>
>
> Am 17.03.2018 um 12:47 schrieb Sérgio V.:
>>
>> Hi, in both Osmand and Maps.me you can load your own GPX or KML files
>> as lines or points:
>>
>>
>> http://osmand.net/blog?id=osmand-1-8-released 
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/MAPS.ME 
>>
>> https://support.maps.me/hc/en-us/articles/207895029-How-can-I-import-bookmarks-
>>  
>>
>> >I am looking for an OSM based mobile app which would allow me to load
>>
>> >additional vector data (shape files, KML, geojson, etc) into it...
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>>
>> Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] proposed mechanical edit - moving building=building to building=yes

[Tobias Knerr]

On 08.06.2018 19:19, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> building=building is an unexpected way to mark building without
> specifying its type and therefore retagging this duplicate to
> building=yes would improve tagging without any information loss.
I'm in favour of proceeding with the proposed mechanical edit. The tag
change in question is doubtlessly an improvement, and the plans are
thoroughly documented. :)

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk