Re: [OSM-talk] Paper/Article about stagnation in OSM

[Mateusz Konieczny]

31. Lipiec 2018 23:49 od frede...@remote.org :


> an interesting read: "The social construction of technological stasis:
> The stagnating data structure in OpenStreetMap."
>




It is hard for me to treat seriously something that has




"Figure 6. Code revisions per month and person in OSM’s SVN repository 
(https://svn.openstreetmap.org )."




graph ending in 2008.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Paper/Article about stagnation in OSM

[Mateusz Konieczny]

1. Sierpień 2018 21:27 od matkoni...@tutanota.com 
:


> 31. Lipiec 2018 23:49 od > frede...@remote.org 
> > :
>
>
>> an interesting read: "The social construction of technological stasis:
>> The stagnating data structure in OpenStreetMap."
>>
>
>
>
>
> It is hard for me to treat seriously something that has
>
>
>
>
> "> Figure 6.>  Code revisions per month and person in OSM’s SVN repository (> 
> https://svn.openstreetmap.org > )."
>
>
>
>
> graph ending in 2008.
>
>




To be clear: I know that there are some attempts to cover activity after 2008
but I would expect from research more than disjointed graphs that areimpossible 
to compare. 



I know that it is not very easy to do, but I would expect something more

than automatic github graphs provide from something that attempts to be 


a scientific research.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Paper/Article about stagnation in OSM

[James]

A lot can happen in 10 years...

On Wed, Aug 1, 2018, 3:34 PM Mateusz Konieczny, 
wrote:

> 1. Sierpień 2018 21:27 od matkoni...@tutanota.com:
>
> 31. Lipiec 2018 23:49 od frede...@remote.org:
>
> an interesting read: "The social construction of technological stasis:
> The stagnating data structure in OpenStreetMap."
>
>
> It is hard for me to treat seriously something that has
>
>
> "Figure 6. Code revisions per month and person in OSM’s SVN repository (
> https://svn.openstreetmap.org)."
>
>
> graph ending in 2008.
>
>
> To be clear: I know that there are some attempts to cover activity after
> 2008
> but I would expect from research more than disjointed graphs that are
> impossible to compare.
>
>
> I know that it is not very easy to do, but I would expect something more
>
> than automatic github graphs provide from something that attempts to be
>
> a scientific research.
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk