date:20181018

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.15.0

2018-10-18 Thread Maarten Deen


On 2018-10-19 05:43, Daniel Koć wrote:


- Moving amenity=atm to z19+


Does this mean that amenity=atm only gets rendered in zoom 19 and 
higher? If so, why? It is now rendered from 17 onward, shops get 
rendered from 18 onward.

It seems to me that atms are at least as important as shops.

Maarten

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.15.0

2018-10-18 Thread Daniel Koć

Dear all,

Today, v4.16.0 of the OpenStreetMap Carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on the OSM website) has been released. Once changes are
deployed on the openstreetmap.org it will take couple of days before all
tiles show the new rendering.

Changes include
- Changing societal amenities color to less intensive
- Adding rendering for natural=strait
- Adding rendering for leisure=track on lines
- Adding icon for amenity=vehicle_inspection
- Adding icon for leisure=sports_centre + sport=swimming and
leisure=swimming_area
- Adding icon for tourism=gallery
- Changing color for aeroway=apron in aerodromes
- Moving amenity=post_box to z19+
- Moving amenity=atm to z19+
- Replacing icon for information=tactile_model
- Ordering amenity_lines by layer
- Small documentation and code fixes

Thanks to all the contributors for this release including dryo, a new
contributor|.|

For a full list of commits, see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v4.15.0...v4.16.0

As always, we welcome any bug reports at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues

-- 
"My method is uncertain/ It's a mess but it's working" [F. Apple]

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Detect and remove sharp angle/spiky configurations on buildings

2018-10-18 Thread Pierre Béland

oups, Resending previous incomplete message

Sandor,
you are looking only at spikes. My algorithm presented in recent threads on
the talk list about Building Geometries detection will also detect regular
geometries that have any irregular edge ( a difference of more then 2 degrees
). It cannot distinguish valid irregular geometries, but they are in general a
small numbers, and most flagged buildings correspond to imprecise building
traces.

regular polygons- 90, 90, 90, 90
- 90, 270, 90, 90, 90, 90
- 120 * 6 (hexagon)- 135 * 8 (octagon)

refhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-August/081274.htmlhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-September/081392.html
Pierre

Pierre

Le jeudi 18 octobre 2018 09 h 15 min 53 s HAE, SandorS
a écrit :

Some days ago there was a question on an OSM forum whether such algorithm
exists and used by some of the OSM users. Honestly I even did not know that
such an issue exists and probably I am not alone. The reason to that is either
that the spiky configurations are hardly visible in maps or that robust users
handle them as a special case when process tiny outgrowths in their data
generalisation programs. A closer look at the issue has shown that the issue is
real and rather general. Spiky configurations exist on most of the area
borders, roads, roundabouts and so on, there is a huge number of them and
almost all are errors. To provide strong arguments about the former statement I
have made an algorithm, a simplified version of the tiny outgrowths detection
and removal, and applied the corresponding program to the OSM UK buildings. The
algorithm on a certain abstraction level, its use and the processing results
are described in details in an article here
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MaLdnSnc454xKjn3eL95vDQKeoIW8zGU . There are
around 120K spiky buildings in OSM and out of these 2834 in the UK. In
addition, the paper presents many examples how the spiky buildings look before
and after the correction. Also, the paper contains links to the output data of
the demo/test processing and how these could be used for visual analyses. So,
if interested, enjoy the paper.

Regards, Sandor.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

___
dev mailing list
d...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Detect and remove sharp angle/spiky configurations on buildings

2018-10-18 Thread Pierre Béland

Sandor, you are looking only at spikes. My algorithm presented in recent
threads about Building Geometries detection will also detect either
rectangular, ortogonal etc. geometries that have any irregular angle ( a
difference of more then 2 degrees ).Regular geometry
- 90, 90, 90, 90

refhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-August/081274.htmlhttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2018-September/081392.html
Pierre

Le jeudi 18 octobre 2018 09 h 15 min 53 s HAE, SandorS
a écrit :

Regards, Sandor.

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

___
dev mailing list
d...@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 170, Issue 22

2018-10-18 Thread St Niklaas

What the  how did this message came through to the Talk list ?

It looks like an ad to me or is it my mistake ?


Greetz



Van: talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org 
Verzonden: donderdag 18 oktober 2018 14:00
Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: talk Digest, Vol 170, Issue 22

Send talk mailing list submissions to
talk@openstreetmap.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
talk Info Page - lists.openstreetmap.org Mailing 
Lists
lists.openstreetmap.org
To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the talk Archives.. 
Using talk: To post a message to all the list members, send email to 
talk@openstreetmap.org. You can subscribe to the list, or change your existing 
subscription, in the sections below.


or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
talk-requ...@openstreetmap.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of talk digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Phantom 4 RTK launched roday: DJI’s Ultimate Mapping
  Solution (oleksiy.muzal...@bluewin.ch)


--

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:13:12 +0200
From: "oleksiy.muzal...@bluewin.ch" 
To: talk 
Subject: [OSM-talk] Phantom 4 RTK launched roday: DJI’s Ultimate
Mapping Solution
Message-ID:

<-a729umlwlno2-aygy9og8ns5j-zhosakv8kafb9w6pbm-68mcx0-x8vdx6640bzx-rn6o21o37g1le47vfh-16d1oo-5crvr2-9tppz1-ehhm05cn5inqq7mcme-ued5iaau4r1n-wkskmsoxttr2-82mob.1539789025...@email.android.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

For your information:

https://dronelife.com/2018/10/15/phantom-4-rtk-launched-globally-today-djis-ultimate-mapping-solution/
Best regards
Oleksiy

Sent from my Huawei Mobile

--

Subject: Digest Footer

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


--

End of talk Digest, Vol 170, Issue 22
*
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Detect and remove sharp angle/spiky configurations on buildings

2018-10-18 Thread SandorS

Some days ago there was a question on an OSM forum whether such algorithm 
exists and used by some of the OSM users. Honestly I even did not know that 
such an issue exists and probably I am not alone. The reason to that is either 
that the spiky configurations are hardly visible in maps or that robust users 
handle them as a special case when process tiny outgrowths in their data 
generalisation programs. A closer look at the issue has shown that the issue is 
real and rather general. Spiky configurations exist on most of the area 
borders, roads, roundabouts and so on, there is a huge number of them and 
almost all are errors. To provide strong arguments about the former statement I 
have made an algorithm, a simplified version of the tiny outgrowths detection 
and removal, and applied the corresponding program to the OSM UK buildings. The 
algorithm on a certain abstraction level, its use and the processing results 
are described in details in an article here 
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MaLdnSnc454xKjn3eL95vDQKeoIW8zGU . There are 
around 120K spiky buildings in OSM and out of these 2834 in the UK. In 
addition, the paper presents many examples how the spiky buildings look before 
and after the correction. Also, the paper contains links to the output data of 
the demo/test processing and how these could be used for visual analyses. So, 
if interested, enjoy the paper.
Regards, Sandor.


Sent from Mail for Windows 10

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.15.0

[OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Carto release v4.15.0

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Detect and remove sharp angle/spiky configurations on buildings

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-dev] Detect and remove sharp angle/spiky configurations on buildings

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 170, Issue 22

[OSM-talk] Detect and remove sharp angle/spiky configurations on buildings

6 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information