Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM Error

[Vincent Privat]

Please create a bug report using integrated feature (Help => Report bug) we
will help you there.
We will also need that you enable the Java console as described here:
https://www.java.com/en/download/help/javaconsole.xml
and that you copy/paste the full console output.
Regards,
Vincent

2015-10-15 21:31 GMT+02:00 Mike Thompson :

> Thanks, I am pretty sure it is something on my end, but in a bug report I
> might ask for an error message to be presented that gave some further
> instructions on solving the problem.
>
> Just to be clear, I think JOSM is a fantastic tool... I am just having
> this one little issue.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Mateusz Konieczny 
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:54:40 -0600
>> Mike Thompson  wrote:
>>
>> > When I start JOSM I get:
>> > ===
>> > JOSM tried to access the following resources:
>> >
>> >- https://josm.openstreetmap.de/maps
>> >- https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/StartupPage
>> >
>> > but *failed* to do so, because of the following network errors:
>> >
>> >- java.security.cert.CertificateException: No name matching
>> >josm.openstreetmap.de found
>> >
>> > It may be due to a missing proxy configuration.
>> > Would you like to change your proxy settings now?
>> > ===
>> >
>> > JOSM still works, but I can't do certain things like update the list
>> > of plugins.
>> >
>> > System Info:
>> > Windows 7
>> > No proxy
>> > Java 8 (happened with 7 as well)
>> > JOSM version 8491
>> > JOSM is set for "no proxy"
>> >
>> > I can use my browser to access https://josm.openstreetmap.de at its
>> > security certificate appears valid.
>> >
>> > I searched the JOSM wiki & tickets.  Everything on stack exchange
>> > seems to be oriented towards Java developers, not users.
>> >
>> > Any ideas?
>> >
>> > Mike
>>
>> I would report a JOSM bug - see
>> https://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Help/Action/ReportBug
>>
>
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Changeset comment function

[Vincent Privat]

Great job! Is there an API to get comments? I didn't find such on the wiki.
Also, are anonymous comments allowed?
Le 2 nov. 2014 12:20, "Richard Weait"  a écrit :

> Wonderful.  Thank you and well done, ukasiu, emacsen, woodpeck and TomH.
> Great to have this long anticipated option.
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] JOSM connection problems downloading/uploading data?

[Vincent Privat]

No, it seems there's a problem with upload (authentication works fine for
changeset creation):

INFO: PUT https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/create...
DEBUG: REQUEST: {User-Agent=[JOSM/1.5 (7459 SVN en) Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Java/1.7.0_65], Connection=[close]}
INFO: OK
DEBUG: RESPONSE: {null=[HTTP/1.1 200 OK], X-Runtime=[0.049391], ETag=[xxx],
Content-Length=[8], X-XSS-Protection=[1; mode=block], X-Request-Id=[xxx],
Connection=[close], Server=[Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu)], X-Powered-By=[Phusion
Passenger 4.0.50], Cache-Control=[max-age=0, private, must-revalidate],
X-Content-Type-Options=[nosniff], X-Frame-Options=[SAMEORIGIN], Status=[200
OK], Date=[Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:06:11 GMT], Content-Type=[text/plain;
charset=utf-8]}

INFO: POST https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/25099130/upload.
..
DEBUG: REQUEST: {User-Agent=[JOSM/1.5 (7459 SVN en) Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Java/1.7.0_65], Connection=[close]}
INFO: Unauthorized
WARNING: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 401 for
URL: https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/25099130/upload.
Cause: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 401 for
URL: https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/25099130/upload
java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 401 for URL:
https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/25099130/upload
ERROR: Error body: Couldn't authenticate you
DEBUG: RESPONSE: {null=[HTTP/1.1 401 Unauthorized], X-Runtime=[0.024400],
WWW-Authenticate=[Basic realm="Web Password"], X-XSS-Protection=[1;
mode=block], X-Request-Id=[xxx], Connection=[close], Server=[Apache/2.4.7
(Ubuntu)], X-Powered-By=[Phusion Passenger 4.0.50],
Cache-Control=[no-cache], X-Content-Type-Options=[nosniff], Status=[401
Unauthorized], X-Frame-Options=[SAMEORIGIN], Transfer-Encoding=[chunked],
Date=[Fri, 29 Aug 2014 15:06:11 GMT], Content-Type=[text/html;
charset=utf-8]}



2014-08-29 16:59 GMT+02:00 Tom Hughes :

> On 29/08/14 15:57, Andy Street wrote:
>
>  FWIW I'm seeing a different error in JOSM:
>>
>> "WARNING: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 401
>> for URL:
>> https://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/changeset/25098566/upload.";
>>
>> The upload succeeds if HTTP is used instead of HTTPS.
>>
>
> 401 is just it telling you to enter your password.
>
>
> Tom
>
> --
> Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
> http://compton.nu/
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap enhances user privacy

[Vincent Privat]

2014-02-13 13:37 GMT+01:00 Tom Hughes :

> On 13/02/14 04:40, JB wrote:
>
>  Remote towards JOSM doesn't work anymore in https? Have you checked this?
>>
>
> Well there's not a lot we can do about it - it works by loading a
> localhost URL in a hidden frame but that is active content so will be
> blocked by modern browsers if loading http from https.
>
> So unless JOSM were to accept https connections to the remote control
> there isn't much we can do.
>
>
JOSM now accepts https connections on port 8112 [1] in addition of standard
http requests on port 8111. Can you update OSM website accordingly? Thanks
:)

[1] https://josm.openstreetmap.de/changeset/6941/josm
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Contacting wiki admins?

[Vincent Privat]

22 wiki administrators ? I didn't think you were so many.

Question: are you all notified about tickets created here ?
https://trac.openstreetmap.org/query?status=accepted&status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&component=wiki&desc=1&order=id

#5077 is annoying.


2014/1/18 Ed Loach 

> wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Special:Statistics has links to which users
> are on the categories but don't think their is a single point of contact.
> I'd probably recommend asking in #osm first of all to see who is around via
> irc.openstreetmap.org if you don't have a client already.
> On 18 Jan 2014 20:09, "Bryce Nesbitt"  wrote:
>
>> Where can I find the osm wiki administrators?
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/About is silent on this topic.
>> Thanks.  Sorry to bother the entire list.
>>
>> ___
>> talk mailing list
>> talk@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>>
>>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] How to improve addressing?

[Vincent Privat]

Hi,

Apart of this welcome change (thanks Frederik !), I'd like to mention some
recent enhancements in JOSM's associatedStreet relations support:

- Revision 5644 (tomorrow's latest) brings a bunch of validator checks
targeted to addresses coherence. These checks are well known to
French-speaking mappers as they are the same as performed by Osmose [1].
- Revisions 5614/5615/5624/5625 (last week) enabled an automatic role
detection when using preset dialog and relation editor. If you add some
highway or addr:housenumber to an associatedStreet relation, the role will
be automatically filled.
- Revision 5516 and 5603 (already included in current tested version)
allowed to sort members according to their addr:housenumber value.

I hope all these changes will ease addresses mapping.

Vincent

[1] http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/errors/?item=2060


2012/12/28 Christian Quest 

> 2012/12/28 Henning Scholland :
> > Hi
> > There was already a HouseNumberTaggingTool for josm, which has an
> increment
> > of 2 each time you open it. This could be done via shortcut K. So use one
> > hand for selecting next building/entrance/what ever with the mouse and
> the
> > other hand for pressing first K and then Enter. It's pretty fast if you
> have
> > an increment of 2.
> >
>
> Have a look at the cadastre JOSM plugin addressing tool, it is so much
> faster... a single click for each address.
>
> 1) open the addressing tool,
> 2) click on the street way
> 3) set the first house number, select the increment +1/+2/-1/-2
> 4) each next click will create the address node/tags, with the
> associatedStreet relation or not (set that in the plugin preferences)
>
> click + shift -> no increment
> click + ctrl -> double increment
>
> --
> Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France - http://openstreetmap.fr/u/cquest
>
> ___
> talk mailing list
> talk@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] All you've ever wanted to know about the french cadastre

[Vincent Privat]

2012/9/27 Lester Caine 

> If I was involved in managing this, then to be honest I'd be considering
> wiping it again.
>

Then I am glad you are not involved in it, because it would be a serious
case of vandalism. This would be totally unjustified to wipe such a valid
geographic information because it lacks a few tags that can be added later
by other people. OSM is a collaborative and iterative map. If you think
uploading buildings is pointless, then don't upload buildings. But that's
not a reason to prevent other people to do so.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Import guidelines & OSMF/DWG governance

[Vincent Privat]

2012/9/18 Martin Koppenhoefer 

>
> I'd put it like this: someone who didn't respect the import guidelines
> valid for  almost one year was temporarily blocked. What's the
> problem? That's what the DWG is for.
>
>
> Really ? According to [1]:

"The *Data Working Group* (d...@osmfoundation.org) is authorised by the
Foundation to deal with accusations of
copyright infringement
and serious Disputes  and
Vandalism ."

As I understand this, the French cadastre integration is not concerned by
any of the DWG attributions. It is not its role to check how good or bad
the integration of external data has been made, when no one complains about
it, when the map has been improved by this integration, and when the local
community is perfectly OK with it.

What happened on 15th september looks like an abuse of authority to me, as
this largely exceeds the limits of the mandate given to the DWG. I expect a
clarification from the OSMF board on this point.

[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Data_working_group
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Another live edit viewer

[Vincent Privat]

It was supposed to be revealed at SOTM ;)

2012/9/4 Paul Norman 

> I saw this mentioned on IRC but I haven't seen it here
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Wind turbines no longer rendered on mapnik layer

[Vincent Privat]

So maybe we'll finally have an answer to our questions in
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/3266 ?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-fr] South Sudan, the world's newest Country

[Vincent Privat]

Is there only someone right ? *Le Monde* suggests today there are still some
disagreements on the exact border location [1] [2].

Vincent

[1]
http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/07/09/le-sud-soudan-proclame-son-independance_1546977_3212.html#ens_id=1067666
[2]
http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/07/09/quelles-relations-entre-le-soudan-et-le-nouvel-etat-du-sud-soudan_1546677_3212.html

---

Y-a-t'il seulement un "bon" tracé ? Deux articles du Monde soulignent
aujourd'hui des désaccords entre les 2 Etats sur le tracé exact de la
frontière [1] [2].

Je cite:
"*Les dirigeants du Nord et ceux du Sud ne se sont toujours pas mis d'accord
sur un ensemble de questions sensibles, dont les plus importantes concernent
le tracé de la frontière*"
"*La question ... n'est pas réglée... Il en va de même pour plusieurs
portions litigieuses de la nouvelles frontières entre les deux pays.*"

Vincent
[1]
http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/07/09/le-sud-soudan-proclame-son-independance_1546977_3212.html#ens_id=1067666
[2]
http://www.lemonde.fr/afrique/article/2011/07/09/quelles-relations-entre-le-soudan-et-le-nouvel-etat-du-sud-soudan_1546677_3212.html

Le 9 juillet 2011 14:15, RatZilla$  a écrit :

> Hi all,
>
> Successfully convert UNITAR datasets with ogr2osm from Ivan Sanchez:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ogr2osm
>
> But it seems to have a gap of 8kms from the actual border ??
> Who is right ? I think it's Unitar because some river are right placed.
>
> I'm available for sharing OSM's converted datasets for quality control
> and discussions.
>
> Gaël
>
> ---
>
> Conversion réussie des jeux de données UNITAR avec ogr2osm d'Ivan Sanchez
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ogr2osm
>
> Il y a un décalage de 8kms avec la frontière actuelle dans OSM ??
> Je pense que le tracée UNITAR est le bon car il correspond avec les
> cours d'eau déjà mappés.
>
> A votre disposition pour la mise à dispo des jeux de données UNITAR
> convertis en .osm pour le contrôle qualité et les discussions.
>
>
> Gaël
>
> ___
> Talk-fr mailing list
> talk...@openstreetmap.org
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
>
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk