Re: [OSM-talk] Satellite Imagery of South America
Hello Guillermo, We talked directly by gtalk, but I would like to answer you on the list so more people can give their opinion. This "license" published at INPE site restricts the use of images by people outside Brazil. On the other hand, I got an answer from a director of INPE, authorizing the use these images for derivative works in CC-BY-SA, and this license has no geographic restrictions on who can use the licensed data. Perhaps the situation is not so clear in legal terms, and there is a chance (I think very low) that we'll have to reverse the work made over these images. But in my opinion we can use the images, making the proper attribution. Vitor On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Guillermo Sansovic wrote: > > > Vitor George gmail.com> writes: > > > > > Hi there, > > Because of the mapping > > we are doing in the states affected by flooding in northeastern > > Brazil, we had direct contact with INPE, and we were informed that the > > satellite images of the CBERS 2B HRC can be used to perform mapping in > > OpenStreetMap. > > The images cover the > > whole South America in a resolution of 2.7m, black and white, and are > > extremely useful to map locations out of large cities. > > The big problem is that > > these images are not geo-referenced, so I'm wondering if we can setup a > > web-service to crowdsource this work, based on gps tracks and other > > satellite imagery. > > The > > image catalog can be > > accessed here: > > http://www.dgi.inpe.br/CDSR/ > > Vitor > > > > > > ___ > > talk mailing list > > talk openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > This would be great for Argentina where we only have good resolution images > of > a handful of cities. > > I downloaded a couple of files and they are quite useful for mapping. > > The problem is that the license only authorizes Brazilian citizens to use > the > images. > > Should we ask our Brazilian neighbours to map our country? > > Is there any other way around? Could we ask for a license for OSM > regardless of > mapper country of residence? > > > > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Changeset 6234414
It seems to be a new user from Brazil trying to upload a .dwg without much knowledge. I´ll try to contact him. On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Barnett, Phillip wrote: > It's located at 0,0 so is obviously incorrect (at least to a first casual > look) ie, whatever the user was intending to map, he's accidentally dumped > it in the wrong place. > > > > > PHILLIP BARNETT > SERVER MANAGER > > 200 GRAY'S INN ROAD > LONDON > WC1X 8XZ > UNITED KINGDOM > T +44 (0)20 7430 4474 > F > E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk > http://WWW.ITN.CO.UK > P Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email? > -Original Message- > > From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto: > talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Toby Murray > Sent: 09 November 2010 06:04 > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Changeset 6234414 > > Look at the shape of the ways: > http://imgur.com/47kmj.png > > Now look at the area that the same user edited in their next few > changesets. For example: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?minlon=-49.3501728&minlat=-25.5176786&maxlon=-49.3216498&maxlat=-25.466278&box=yes > > I'm not sure what they were trying to do but it looks like they used > the wrong projection when converting from their source to OSM so > everything got shifted. The user should probably be contacted. Anyone > speak Portugese? > > But at the end of the day I'm guessing this changeset needs to be reverted. > > Toby > > > On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 9:17 PM, MP wrote: > > Does anybody have idea what it is? Seems to be large lot of untagged > lines > > in middle of the ocean and I don't see what it could be (coral reefs? > some > > under-sea features?). > > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6234414 > > > > What should be done with similar uploads, if the ways are untagged and it > is > > not very clear what they should be? > > > > Google translate told the summary is "map made in autocad and being > passed > > on to the OSM" which isn't very explanatory about source and purpose of > the > > data. > > > > Martin > > > > ___ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > Please Note: > > Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily > represent those of Independent Television News Limited unless specifically > stated. This email and any files attached are confidential and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. > If you have received this email in error, please notify > postmas...@itn.co.uk > > Please note that to ensure regulatory compliance and for the protection of > our clients and business, we may monitor and read messages sent to and from > our systems. > > Thank You. > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Changeset 6234414
I didn't had time this week to contact him, but I sent a message a few minutes ago. I'll wait for the answer before to proceed with the revert. Vitor On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 7:54 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:25 AM, vitor wrote: > > It seems to be a new user from Brazil trying to upload a .dwg without > much > > knowledge. I´ll try to contact him. > > Did you find out anything? I see the changeset hasn't been reverted yet > > Toby > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Talk-br] Tagging blocks in brasilia
I like the proposal to create a new tag 'addr:block=*', associated to bounding polygons. It can be used strictly for addressing purposes, unlike the tag 'landuse=*'. Vitor George mapaslivres.org twitter.com/mapaslivres On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Claudomiro Nascimento Junior < claudom...@claudomiro.com> wrote: > I think that something can be leaned about Japan address system in this > case [1] - they use block "numbers" instead of street "names". > > cheers > > [1] http://sivers.org/jadr > > > On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Tulio Macedo wrote: > >> I've some thoughts about it, in [1] we have an street name, it's not >> official, but it's how we call it. The street between SCRN 709 and SCRN 710 >> is SCRN 709/710. All the cases when this occurs can be mapped, even >> virtually. >> >> In [2], it's more like a dot at center of the block, it's confusing, as >> you described. A superquadra is a block with 500 x 500 meters. In the >> picture you can see it, the streets drawing a square. >> >> Those blocks in Taguatinga, in [3], can be named by the street. In the >> example, QNA 45 is a street where the houses in both sides have adresses >> like QNA 45 Casa (house) 5 or QNA 45 Casa 4. In Guará, Lago Sul, Lago >> Norte, will be the same. >> >> Regards, >> >> Tulio >> >> [1] https://skitch.com/alexbarth/8i8em/java-openstreetmap-editor >> [2] https://skitch.com/alexbarth/8i8g9/java-openstreetmap-editor >> [3] https://skitch.com/alexbarth/8i8gj/java-openstreetmap-editor >> >> >> Em 23 de abril de 2012 20:11, Alex Barth escreveu: >> >> >>> Oi - >>> >>> Proposal for tagging blocks in brasilia here: >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2012-April/009878.html >>> >>> Looking forward to your comments. >>> >>> Alex Barth >>> http://twitter.com/lxbarth >>> tel (202) 250-3633 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Talk-br mailing list >>> talk...@openstreetmap.org >>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br >>> >> >> >> ___ >> Talk-br mailing list >> talk...@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br >> >> > > ___ > Talk-br mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-br > > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Ipatinga, Brazil, is gone
Thank you, Simon. We have some pdf files of maps produced by the local government that can be useful for streetnames. I will check if the municipalities allows to produce ODbL data with them. Vitor On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > There seems to be very good imagery present there, so I've added a job > to rebuild.poole.ch > > Simon > > Am 07.08.2012 08:25, schrieb popp...@hm.edu: > > I used the remaining nodes to create some highways. You may have to split > > them into smaller parts according to the real world. Its best to find a > > local mapper to refine the highways. > > I tagged the newly created highways as highway=unclassified, name=FIXME > > with a note. Check them and remove the after checking. > > I also deleted some highways (owner=redaction bot) which had no > attributes > > / tags and used their nodes for new highways. > > The aerial images from bing seems to be much different in various zoom > > levels. Dont forget that big displacement when mapping. > > > > WernerP > > > > PS: I sent this email as a new mail using the old subject, because I have > > currently some troubles sending mail from my email client at home. Sorry. > > > > > > ___ > > talk mailing list > > talk@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Satellite Imagery of South America
Hi there, Because of the mapping we are doing in the states affected by flooding in northeastern Brazil, we had direct contact with INPE, and we were informed that the satellite images of the CBERS 2B HRC can be used to perform mapping in OpenStreetMap. The images cover the whole South America in a resolution of 2.7m, black and white, and are extremely useful to map locations out of large cities. The big problem is that these images are not geo-referenced, so I'm wondering if we can setup a web-service to crowdsource this work, based on gps tracks and other satellite imagery. The image catalog can be accessed here: http://www.dgi.inpe.br/CDSR/ Vitor ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Reversion of Edits
Hi there, There is a user in Brazil that is copying street names and other things from copyrighted maps. We've already talked to him. http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andredrm He's a new user, so I think we can reverted all of its edits. How can we do this? Vitor ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Reversion of Edits
He confirmed that he was copying from a copyrighted source, and said ok for the revesion. I´ve explained that he coulnd´t do this copy and sent him a wiki link about legal sources of information. Vitor 2010/4/9, Shaun McDonald : > > On 9 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Vitor George wrote: > >> Hi there, >> >> There is a user in Brazil that is copying street names and other things >> from copyrighted maps. We've already talked to him. > > Can you please elaborate on your contact with the user? > What has been said? > Is he happy for the revert? > > Shaun > >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andredrm >> >> He's a new user, so I think we can reverted all of its edits. >> >> How can we do this? >> >> Vitor >> ___ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > -- Enviado do meu celular ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Reversion of Edits
Anyone can help me with the reversion or we leave as is? Vitor On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Shaun McDonald wrote: > I'll leave that for whoever decides to do the revert. I don't do reverts. > > Shaun > > On 13 Apr 2010, at 19:58, Vitor George wrote: > > Shaun, > > Do you need more information about this case? > > Thanks, > Vitor > > > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Vitor George wrote: > >> He confirmed that he was copying from a copyrighted source, and said >> ok for the revesion. >> >> I´ve explained that he coulnd´t do this copy and sent him a wiki link >> about legal sources of information. >> >> Vitor >> >> 2010/4/9, Shaun McDonald : >> > >> > On 9 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Vitor George wrote: >> > >> >> Hi there, >> >> >> >> There is a user in Brazil that is copying street names and other things >> >> from copyrighted maps. We've already talked to him. >> > >> > Can you please elaborate on your contact with the user? >> > What has been said? >> > Is he happy for the revert? >> > >> > Shaun >> > >> >> >> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andredrm >> >> >> >> He's a new user, so I think we can reverted all of its edits. >> >> >> >> How can we do this? >> >> >> >> Vitor >> >> ___ >> >> talk mailing list >> >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> > >> > >> >> -- >> Enviado do meu celular >> > > > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Reversion of Edits
I've opened a reversion page for the brazililian community: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Registros_de_Pedidos_de_Revers%C3%A3o_no_Brasil If you need, we can translate it to english. These are the changesets: #4369875 #4341199 #4340536 #4339311 #4338611 #4338360 #4294314 #4294237 #4294033 #4291609 #4291549 #4291412 #4290878 #4289357 #4286167 #4285990 Tks, Vitor On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Apollinaris Schoell wrote: > can you send a list of changesets? > please add also the communication with the user to have it documented or > add a wiki page with the info > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Vitor George wrote: > >> Anyone can help me with the reversion or we leave as is? >> >> Vitor >> >> On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Shaun McDonald < >> sh...@shaunmcdonald.me.uk> wrote: >> >>> I'll leave that for whoever decides to do the revert. I don't do reverts. >>> >>> Shaun >>> >>> On 13 Apr 2010, at 19:58, Vitor George wrote: >>> >>> Shaun, >>> >>> Do you need more information about this case? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Vitor >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Vitor George wrote: >>> >>>> He confirmed that he was copying from a copyrighted source, and said >>>> ok for the revesion. >>>> >>>> I´ve explained that he coulnd´t do this copy and sent him a wiki link >>>> about legal sources of information. >>>> >>>> Vitor >>>> >>>> 2010/4/9, Shaun McDonald : >>>> > >>>> > On 9 Apr 2010, at 17:43, Vitor George wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hi there, >>>> >> >>>> >> There is a user in Brazil that is copying street names and other >>>> things >>>> >> from copyrighted maps. We've already talked to him. >>>> > >>>> > Can you please elaborate on your contact with the user? >>>> > What has been said? >>>> > Is he happy for the revert? >>>> > >>>> > Shaun >>>> > >>>> >> >>>> >> http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andredrm >>>> >> >>>> >> He's a new user, so I think we can reverted all of its edits. >>>> >> >>>> >> How can we do this? >>>> >> >>>> >> Vitor >>>> >> ___ >>>> >> talk mailing list >>>> >> talk@openstreetmap.org >>>> >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Enviado do meu celular >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> talk mailing list >> talk@openstreetmap.org >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >> >> > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Reversion of Edits
Hi, The user has used Google Maps and a printed street maps that had copyright restrictions. Vitor On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:08 PM, andrzej zaborowski wrote: > On 14 April 2010 19:27, Vitor George wrote: > > I've opened a reversion page for the brazililian community: > > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Registros_de_Pedidos_de_Revers%C3%A3o_no_Brasil > > > > If you need, we can translate it to english. > > Can you include the source from which data was copied? Then maybe the > license can be checked or author contacted. Let's make sure nothing > is deleted that turns out was legal and useful. > > I think this is the basic information if you want to revert editions. > > Cheers > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
