Re: [OSM-talk] [Spam?]Re: Underground / hovering buildings
2011/2/17 SomeoneElse : > On 17/02/2011 01:04, Robin Paulson wrote: > The last time that someone did this, a lot of people complained (me > included) here. If there's a descrepancy then that needs to be resolved. > If you've got access to REALLY good aerial imagery you might be able to do > it remotely, but otherwise you might have to actually go there and have a > look. > Having the likes of keepright as a source of "stuff to check in the field" > is really useful, "note=layer set by bot" is less so. completely agree. These assumptions belong in the rendering rules, not in the database. cheers, Martin ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Spam?]Re: Underground / hovering buildings
On 17/02/2011 01:04, Robin Paulson wrote: On 17 February 2011 12:21, David Murn wrote: Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node. i wonder what would be the consequences of scripting this? The bot author's ears turn red? The last time that someone did this, a lot of people complained (me included) here. If there's a descrepancy then that needs to be resolved. If you've got access to REALLY good aerial imagery you might be able to do it remotely, but otherwise you might have to actually go there and have a look. Having the likes of keepright as a source of "stuff to check in the field" is really useful, "note=layer set by bot" is less so. Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Spam?]Re: Underground / hovering buildings
On 17 February 2011 12:21, David Murn wrote: > Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river > and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node. i wonder what would be the consequences of scripting this? if layer does not exist and bridge = yes then layer = 1 note = layer set by a bot, please check manually ? possibly with some intelligence by checking for ways crossing but not intersecting -- robin http://tangleball.org.nz/ - Auckland's Creative Space http://openstreetmap.org.nz/ - Open Street Map New Zealand http://bumblepuppy.org/blog/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] [Spam?]Re: Underground / hovering buildings
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 19:57 +1100, Elizabeth Dodd wrote: > On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500 > Nathan Edgars II wrote: > > > Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every > > place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done. > > -1 is used for rivers commonly over long distances where traced and no > idea where the bridges actually are. Ive fixed quite a number of spots where keepright has picked up a river and highway on the same layer (=0), generally without a junction node. David ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
