This whole licensing process went way above the competence of the LWG, both in legal, management as in technical sense. As usual, these things will be worked out when the circumstances demand it. Just like in the old-fashioned do-ocratic way.
Gert Gremmen ----------------------------------------------------- Openstreetmap.nl (alias: cetest) Before printing, think about the environment. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Russ Nelson [mailto:nel...@crynwr.com] Verzonden: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:31 AM Aan: talk@openstreetmap.org Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-talk] Announce: Beginning of Phase 4 of licensechange process Heiko Jacobs writes: > Am 15.06.2011 06:59, schrieb Russ Nelson: > > Michael Collinson writes: > > > As per the implementation plan [1], we intend to move to phase 4 this > > > Sunday 19th June or as soon after as is technically practical. This > > will > > > mean that anyone who has explicitly declined the new contributor terms > > > will no longer be able to edit, (unless they decide to accept). > > > > What about the people who have declared their edits to be in the > > public domain? > > Setting PD flag without accepting OBL/DBCL/CT isn't possible in the moment > (or did I miss a loop hole, where you can set all flags independantly??) > > Or did you mean users declaring their edits INSIDE THE WIKI als PD like > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Users_whose_contributions_are_in_the_public_domain > but not declaring it using the "official" PD flag, because they don't > want to accept ODBL/CT...? Yes, inside the Wiki. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
