[OSM-talk] Google expands their map data

2010-11-13 Thread S Omeone

Hi,

I haven't seen this mention before and I thought it might be of some interest 
here.

Since sometime last year Google no longer used TeleAtlas for their map data in 
the
USA but instead created their own map data.  It seems they have now extended
their own data to 10 more countries including some in Europe Africa and
Oceania [1,2]. However, what makes it interesting from a OSM point of view
(apart from knowing what the competitors do) is the way they seemingly crowd
source their  updates and error reports. (The main data is, unlike their also 
very
 successful map maker maps, not crowd sourced, but supposedly collected together
with the street view data). Just like they have had in the US, however, they now
have a nice and simple, easy to spot and convenient  Report a problem link in
these countries in the bottom right hand corner.

OpenStreetMap has of cause something similar with OpenStreetBugs (which
Google may well have used as inspiration), but unfortunately, as too often, less
convenient.  Instead of simply clicking on the report a problem link, in OSM you
first have to know something like this exists, then figure out that you might 
learn
about such a feature on the wiki, search the wiki for it, go to some random 
external
page, then find your location on the map again without a search box on the OSB
page, and then finally you might actually be able to add your error report...

Can we perhaps learn something from Google of how to build a nice user friendly
crowd sourcing of local knowledge?

Also, can we perhaps somehow harness the fact that Google is educating people
about the possibilities to crowd source maps through map maker and the report a
problem link? E.g. by creating a press release highlighting some of the 
additional
benefits of OSM over Google (without being unfair to them)?

Or will Google eventually beat OSM at its own game?

[1] 
http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-maps-in-10-countries-teleatlas-going-away-55288
[2] http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2010/11/changing-world-changing-maps.html
  
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Google expands their map data

2010-11-13 Thread Richard Fairhurst

S Omeone wrote:
 OpenStreetMap has of cause something similar with OpenStreetBugs 
 (which Google may well have used as inspiration), but unfortunately, 
 as too often, less convenient.
 [...]
 Can we perhaps learn something from Google of how to build a nice user 
 friendly crowd sourcing of local knowledge?

Pretty much everyone _already_ knows that
a) OSB is fabulous
b) that sort of functionality should be integrated on the main osm.org site

Unfortunately, of the 000s of people who comprise pretty much everyone,
exactly 0.0 people have come up with some deployable code to do it.

It's really not complicated. You need some basic OpenLayers knowledge (for a
draggable marker), some basic Rails knowledge (for a Node-like object), and
the ability to write code within a particular style (i.e. fitting with the
current site) rather than imposing your own personal preferences. The design
is very simple: I could probably rattle off a useful spec within about 10
seconds. I and others will be happy to help with suggestions, advice etc. on
#osm whenever you need it.

My own excuse for not having done it is that I'm already spending vast
amounts of development time on Potlatch 2. What's yours?

cheers
Richard



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Google-expands-their-map-data-tp5735850p5736000.html
Sent from the General Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Google expands their map data

2010-11-13 Thread john whelan
Building something that is user friendly is actually quite difficult and
takes a lot more resources and testing than you might think.  It really
needs a consistent integrated well planned team approach which isn't quite
what OSM is.  We just have a lot of people who do their own thing.
Including some who say it doesn't matter if we remove all the old data from
the maps and just retain the Odbl stuff.

Cheerio John

On 13 November 2010 12:54, S Omeone someonew...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Hi,

 I haven't seen this mention before and I thought it might be of some
 interest here.

 Since sometime last year Google no longer used TeleAtlas for their map data
 in the
 USA but instead created their own map data.  It seems they have now
 extended
 their own data to 10 more countries including some in Europe Africa and
 Oceania [1,2]. However, what makes it interesting from a OSM point of view
 (apart from knowing what the competitors do) is the way they seemingly
 crowd
 source their  updates and error reports. (The main data is, unlike their
 also very
  successful map maker maps, not crowd sourced, but supposedly collected
 together
 with the street view data). Just like they have had in the US, however,
 they now
 have a nice and simple, easy to spot and convenient  Report a problem
 link in
 these countries in the bottom right hand corner.

 OpenStreetMap has of cause something similar with OpenStreetBugs (which
 Google may well have used as inspiration), but unfortunately, as too often,
 less
 convenient.  Instead of simply clicking on the report a problem link, in
 OSM you
 first have to know something like this exists, then figure out that you
 might learn
 about such a feature on the wiki, search the wiki for it, go to some random
 external
 page, then find your location on the map again without a search box on the
 OSB
 page, and then finally you might actually be able to add your error
 report...

 Can we perhaps learn something from Google of how to build a nice user
 friendly
 crowd sourcing of local knowledge?

 Also, can we perhaps somehow harness the fact that Google is educating
 people
 about the possibilities to crowd source maps through map maker and the
 report a
 problem link? E.g. by creating a press release highlighting some of the
 additional
 benefits of OSM over Google (without being unfair to them)?

 Or will Google eventually beat OSM at its own game?

 [1]
 http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-maps-in-10-countries-teleatlas-going-away-55288
 [2]
 http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2010/11/changing-world-changing-maps.html

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Google expands their map data

2010-11-13 Thread Mike Dupont
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:47 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:

 Including some who say it doesn't matter if we remove all the old data from
 the maps and just retain the Odbl stuff.

funny you say that, while we are fighting over silly licenses, google is
just taking over.
I would like to say that i am learning about the ruby code and making
prototypes in transiki.org code that will be later usable in the osm engine.
I think there is lots of room for improvement on the railsport and lots of
things we can do to improve the user interface.
The forks of osm will provide a good testing ground for changes, in fact
this license dispute might be good for creativity.
mike


-- 
James Michael DuPont
Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org
flossal.org
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Google expands their map data

2010-11-13 Thread Nic Roets
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:54 PM, S Omeone someonew...@hotmail.com wrote:


 Hi,

 I haven't seen this mention before and I thought it might be of some
 interest here.

 Since sometime last year Google no longer used TeleAtlas for their map data
 in the
 USA but instead created their own map data.  It seems they have now
 extended
 their own data to 10 more countries including some in Europe Africa and


In South Africa's case that doesn't mean too much. The StreetView cars
didn't cover all the roads. So they had to buy  data from a commercial
vendor. That vendor has some quality issues (see the illegal route in the
link below). They also rely on government data that is no longer being
maintained.

So Google is not really smarter. They are relying on man power like everyone
else.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=dsource=s_dsaddr=-25.781959,28.291027daddr=326+Edna+St,+Pretoria+0081,+South+Africahl=engeocode=%3BCXVbiDH7YSbAFSendv4duLevASkdxtgEomCVHjEtejqmm6w9SAmra=miftmrsp=0sz=17sll=-25.781141,28.290718sspn=0.006975,0.009645ie=UTF8z=17


 Oceania [1,2]. However, what makes it interesting from a OSM point of view
 (apart from knowing what the competitors do) is the way they seemingly
 crowd
 source their  updates and error reports. (The main data is, unlike their
 also very
  successful map maker maps, not crowd sourced, but supposedly collected
 together
 with the street view data). Just like they have had in the US, however,
 they now
 have a nice and simple, easy to spot and convenient  Report a problem
 link in
 these countries in the bottom right hand corner.

 OpenStreetMap has of cause something similar with OpenStreetBugs (which
 Google may well have used as inspiration), but unfortunately, as too often,
 less
 convenient.  Instead of simply clicking on the report a problem link, in
 OSM you
 first have to know something like this exists, then figure out that you
 might learn
 about such a feature on the wiki, search the wiki for it, go to some random
 external
 page, then find your location on the map again without a search box on the
 OSB
 page, and then finally you might actually be able to add your error
 report...

 Can we perhaps learn something from Google of how to build a nice user
 friendly
 crowd sourcing of local knowledge?

 Also, can we perhaps somehow harness the fact that Google is educating
 people
 about the possibilities to crowd source maps through map maker and the
 report a
 problem link? E.g. by creating a press release highlighting some of the
 additional
 benefits of OSM over Google (without being unfair to them)?

 Or will Google eventually beat OSM at its own game?

 [1]
 http://searchengineland.com/google-updates-maps-in-10-countries-teleatlas-going-away-55288
 [2]
 http://google-latlong.blogspot.com/2010/11/changing-world-changing-maps.html

 ___
 talk mailing list
 talk@openstreetmap.org
 http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk