[OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of mapping (especially landuses) is poor. I am interested in places mapped better than my current test locations http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.87433/16.77617 - Czech republic http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.4102/13.4749 - area between Malmo and Ystad http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.15249/21.07066 - Slovakia http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.87460/16.77673 - Czech republic http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.93190/7.08075 - Netherlands http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.2134/-1.7983 - rural area where highway=footway are important (UK) Also, is anybody aware about well mapped town/city with surroundings? I would expect mapped landuses and buildings, with highway=residential/unclassified/track used correctly. I am looking for town/city without highway=unclassified used for all roads in town, without highway=residential linking villages, without track used instead of surface=unpaved and without roads linking settlements turning into highway=residential within villages/towns (also, without other less typical significant mistakes in road tagging). These test locations are used during developing of road style for Default map style (to test various ideas in multiple varied locations - as changes improve situation for some places and make it worse in other). ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
Hello Mateusz, Sorry for the incomplete message, using Outlook web client at work and it has some completely eccentric shortcuts, like Control-V sending a message rather than doing a paste... what a stupid idea. Anyway the area I was trying to send you was http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/51.0506/-0.7229 Nick ___ From: Mateusz Konieczny Sent: 20 July 2015 11:04 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of mapping (especially landuses) is poor. I am interested in places mapped better than my current test locations http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.87433/16.77617 - Czech republic http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.4102/13.4749 - area between Malmo and Ystad http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.15249/21.07066 - Slovakia http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.87460/16.77673 - Czech republic http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.93190/7.08075 - Netherlands http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.2134/-1.7983 - rural area where highway=footway are important (UK) Also, is anybody aware about well mapped town/city with surroundings? I would expect mapped landuses and buildings, with highway=residential/unclassified/track used correctly. I am looking for town/city without highway=unclassified used for all roads in town, without highway=residential linking villages, without track used instead of surface=unpaved and without roads linking settlements turning into highway=residential within villages/towns (also, without other less typical significant mistakes in road tagging). These test locations are used during developing of road style for Default map style (to test various ideas in multiple varied locations - as changes improve situation for some places and make it worse in other). ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
Check out Rossleben [1] in Germany. Every tree, gate, powerline and even every road area is mapped to completion [1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.30234/11.43073 Em 20/07/2015 11:49, "Nick Whitelegg" escreveu: > > > Hello Mateusz, > > Sorry for the incomplete message, using Outlook web client at work and it > has some completely eccentric shortcuts, like Control-V sending a message > rather than doing a paste... what a stupid idea. > > Anyway the area I was trying to send you was > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/51.0506/-0.7229 > > Nick > > > ___ > From: Mateusz Konieczny > Sent: 20 July 2015 11:04 > To: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped > town/city > > I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all > are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of > mapping (especially landuses) is poor. > > I am interested in places mapped better than my current test locations > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.87433/16.77617 - Czech republic > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.4102/13.4749 - area between Malmo > and Ystad > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.15249/21.07066 - Slovakia > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.87460/16.77673 - Czech republic > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.93190/7.08075 - Netherlands > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.2134/-1.7983 - rural area where > highway=footway are important (UK) > > Also, is anybody aware about well mapped town/city with surroundings? > I would expect mapped landuses and buildings, with > highway=residential/unclassified/track used correctly. > > I am looking for town/city without highway=unclassified used for all > roads in town, without highway=residential linking villages, without > track used instead of surface=unpaved and without roads linking > settlements turning into highway=residential within villages/towns > (also, without other less typical significant mistakes in road tagging). > > These test locations are used during developing of road style for > Default map style (to test various ideas in multiple varied locations - > as changes improve situation for some places and make it worse in > other). > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
On 20/07/2015 11:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of mapping (especially landuses) is poor. One place where rural landuse is mapped is here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/53.2883/-1.5159 Specifically this tile: http://b.tile.openstreetmap.org/13/4061/2657.png For comparison, a rendering designed to show rural features more clearly* has that area as: http://imgur.com/miP025m Another example, a little to the southeast: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.2804/-1.4825 Specifically this tile: http://a.tile.openstreetmap.org/14/8125/5315.png For comparison, the rendering designed to show rural features more clearly has that area as: http://imgur.com/vnsekXL Cheers, Andy * Provided just to give an idea of what's there, since it's not obvious from the standard style. Ignore the path colours here, since they're showing England/Wales public footpaths and bridleways, which isn't useful internationally, but path width is relevant (dashes for wide, dots for narrow). Obviously a "rural" rendering would likely look rubbish in towns, but some sort of middle ground between it and what the "standard" layer shows now (which looks rubbish outside of towns) should be possible - if we're having "one standard style for everywhere" (which I'm not convinced about, but that's a different discussion). ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
On 20/07/2015 11:04, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of mapping (especially landuses) is poor. ... and one with both landuse and field boundaries just west of the previous one: http://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/14/8124/5315.png http://imgur.com/GYGzfJN Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
Rossleben is hard to beat. I do have two more examples though: Húsavík, small rural town in Iceland, plenty of landuse, a river, paths http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/66.0412/-17.3295 Smárar neigborhood in larger town Kópavogur in Iceland, landuse, roads, paths, sport fields, public and private parking and more http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/64.1005/-21.8933 Bokspits, a border town in Botswana, paths and gates and fences (probably trumped by Rossleben) plus an airport and border control. All links to other towns (similarly mapped and rural) are via at least Tertiary roads - as is most of Botswana that has been mapped so far. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/-26.8939/20.6974 Personally I have not seen your suggestions as improvements on current map style so far, perhaps I'm just too used to the current Primary, Secondary and Tertiary colors, all of which we use as accurately as possible in urban Iceland. Þann 20.7.2015 10:56, skrifaði Marcos Oliveira: Check out Rossleben [1] in Germany. Every tree, gate, powerline and even every road area is mapped to completion [1] - http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/51.30234/11.43073 Em 20/07/2015 11:49, "Nick Whitelegg" <mailto:nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk>> escreveu: Hello Mateusz, Sorry for the incomplete message, using Outlook web client at work and it has some completely eccentric shortcuts, like Control-V sending a message rather than doing a paste... what a stupid idea. Anyway the area I was trying to send you was http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/51.0506/-0.7229 Nick ___ From: Mateusz Konieczny mailto:matkoni...@gmail.com>> Sent: 20 July 2015 11:04 To: talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> Subject: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of mapping (especially landuses) is poor. I am interested in places mapped better than my current test locations http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.87433/16.77617 - Czech republic http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/55.4102/13.4749 - area between Malmo and Ystad http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.15249/21.07066 - Slovakia http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/49.87460/16.77673 - Czech republic http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/52.93190/7.08075 - Netherlands http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/53.2134/-1.7983 - rural area where highway=footway are important (UK) Also, is anybody aware about well mapped town/city with surroundings? I would expect mapped landuses and buildings, with highway=residential/unclassified/track used correctly. I am looking for town/city without highway=unclassified used for all roads in town, without highway=residential linking villages, without track used instead of surface=unpaved and without roads linking settlements turning into highway=residential within villages/towns (also, without other less typical significant mistakes in road tagging). These test locations are used during developing of road style for Default map style (to test various ideas in multiple varied locations - as changes improve situation for some places and make it worse in other). ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all > are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of > mapping (especially landuses) is poor. > > I am interested in places mapped better than my current test locations > maybe relevant: http://bestofosm.org/ -- -S ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Looking for well mapped rural area and well mapped town/city
I can recommend most of East Yorkshire in the UK http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/53.8689/-0.6582. It's very well mapped, most fields are traced, landuse, buildings, etc.. Tony On 22 July 2015 at 10:30, Simone Cortesi wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Mateusz Konieczny > wrote: >> >> I am looking for well mapped rural area. I located some places but all >> are either missing major features (like part of landuse) or quality of >> mapping (especially landuses) is poor. >> >> I am interested in places mapped better than my current test locations > > > maybe relevant: http://bestofosm.org/ > > -- > -S > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
