Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of Farmland not 'Light' enough? Updated Proposals

2013-01-06 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi all,

Thanks for the feedback. I have tested some other shades:

https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bMzVMQ1Z1SHFqcmM

Any additional comments are very welcome.

Rob



On 5 January 2013 22:18, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi All,

 (full text and images at
 https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bYm9IWXdlVHM1N1U )

 Recently landuse=farmland (or simply landuse=farm) has been added to
 fields near me. This has led to a discussion about how the rendering
 'looks' with some arguing that it doesn't look that good. I believe that
 this may be due to the shade of colour used – specifically the farmland
 'brown' is not as luminous as the default 'grey' (actually I think it
 'lightness' rather than 'luminosity' that matters to the human eye but I
 got very confused when searching the two).

  Consider the image below, showing current rendering:

 https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bZDBTN2dZZkpDenc

 On the left we have farmland tagged. The 'brown' has a Lightness value of
 83 percent (luminance of 85%). Compare this to the default canvas 'grey',
 which has 93 percent Lightness (and 93 percent luminance).

  Now consider the following (and please check your screen calibration at
 http://www.photofriday.com/calibrate.php ). I have taken the farmland
 'brown' and raised it's Lightness to the same 93 percent as the default
 'grey' (that is, I have left the Hue and Saturation the same):

 https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bSzk5NDZVMm5GZkE

 In this final image, I have adjusted the Hue and Saturation to provide
 more of a 'green':

 https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bZXhzdVJMVU44X2M

 What are your thoughts? Which do you prefer? Have I gone too 'light' with
 the change and should some value in-between be used instead? Am I barking
 up the wrong tree?


 Regards,

 Rob

  Note: To focus discussion I want to avoid the argument that some people
 see farmland as the default and therefore it does not need to be tagged –
 it is a legitimate land-use tag and if people want to tag it then let them.

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Rendering of Farmland not 'Light' enough? Updated Proposals

2013-01-06 Thread Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
On 6 January 2013 19:13, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
 Thanks for the feedback. I have tested some other shades:

 https://docs.google.com/open?id=0B6J5ZA1hu93bMzVMQ1Z1SHFqcmM

I think the first of the new ones under Update 1 (lighter brown;
same lightness as landuse=residential) looks fine. I don't really like
any of the other new ones though -- I think they're all too green (and
we already use greens for lots of other things).

Robert.

-- 
Robert Whittaker

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk