Re: [OSM-talk] Request for comments: Playground Equipment Proposal
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 07:06 +1000, Liz wrote: > > but anyway as voting just finished and it was not > > anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should > > set it back to proposed and wait for some response. > > > What reason other your personal ignorance do you have for restarting a > process > which has been fully completed? The committee of the Wildlife Foundation would be impressed. David ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for comments: Playground Equipment Proposal
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, colliar wrote: > Am 01.06.2010 16:01, schrieb lulu-...@gmx.de: > > Hi there, > > > > this is not my proposal, but as RfC was forgotten I ask for your comments > > now. > > > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment It has been well discussed on mailing list, tagging, where info on tagging now goes http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-March/001644.html Just because it doesn't have RFC in the title doesn't mean it wasn't done > > I think it is not bad, thanks for your opinion > but anyway as voting just finished and it was not > anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should > set it back to proposed and wait for some response. > What reason other your personal ignorance do you have for restarting a process which has been fully completed? > I do not get why it is too hard to send two emails to some mailing-lists. The emails were sent. you might check the wiki, and find that recently someone, not me, changed the list for notification to "tagging" from "talk", now that tagging is nearly one year old. You can join here http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > > colliar ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Request for comments: Playground Equipment Proposal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 01.06.2010 16:01, schrieb lulu-...@gmx.de: > Hi there, > > this is not my proposal, but as RfC was forgotten I ask for your comments now. > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment I think it is not bad, but anyway as voting just finished and it was not anounced on the list and the tag is not wide used, I would say we should set it back to proposed and wait for some response. I do not get why it is too hard to send two emails to some mailing-lists. colliar -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREIAAYFAkwGXaEACgkQalWTFLzqsCu9KgCeO4ziuq9g3Zvi64TTV09miMou 4OwAoKEMYPeOotaXrTtco2YgmZW9JQdV =xovp -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Request for comments: Playground Equipment Proposal
Hi there, this is not my proposal, but as RfC was forgotten I ask for your comments now. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Playground_Equipment Regards Lulu-Ann -- GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT! Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01 ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
