Re: [OSM-talk] Residential road on a hill
> I don't think > footway=yes|no is properly documented, but it is referred to in a few > places, and I haven't come across an alternative tagging for it. > > Richard I just draw footway separately, simply because they are off the road several meters and sometimes goes in opposite directions. Cheers, Peter. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Residential road on a hill
Arlindo Pereira wrote: > Hi there, > > there's a residential road on a hill near my house (this one: > http://osm.org/go/OVc0itC2c- ) that doesn't go from bottom to the top > of it, but runs in a longitudinal way. The thing it that it's > sidewalks are not in the same level. It's more or less like this: > > ___ >|___ >|___ > a b c > > Where b is the road itself and a and c are it's sidewalks. Those | > (the height difference from the road itself and the sidewalks) vary > from 1 to 4 meters aproximately. Every 20 meter or so, there are some > steps so that people can go from a or c to b and cross the street. Nice, I've got the same here (but not yet mapped). > How would you map this? Three lines, highway=residential and > highway=footway (or pedestrian?) with it's steps? I would do it like this. > If so, how would you express that this highway=residential has no > sidewalks? How would you express that a is higher than b that is > higher than c? I'm aware that level=* is used when things cross, that > doesn't seem to be the case. I think the highway=steps express already that one way is slightly above the other one. I don't see a real need to add this "is higher than" information since we may use srtm data for visualizing this. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Residential road on a hill
Three ways, middle one is highway=residential+footway=no, explicit links between the ways where there is a connection (highway=steps). I don't think footway=yes|no is properly documented, but it is referred to in a few places, and I haven't come across an alternative tagging for it. Richard On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Arlindo Pereira wrote: > Hi there, > > there's a residential road on a hill near my house (this one: > http://osm.org/go/OVc0itC2c- ) that doesn't go from bottom to the top of > it, but runs in a longitudinal way. The thing it that it's sidewalks are not > in the same level. It's more or less like this: > > ___ >|___ >|___ > a b c > > Where b is the road itself and a and c are it's sidewalks. Those | (the > height difference from the road itself and the sidewalks) vary from 1 to 4 > meters aproximately. Every 20 meter or so, there are some steps so that > people can go from a or c to b and cross the street. > > How would you map this? Three lines, highway=residential and > highway=footway (or pedestrian?) with it's steps? If so, how would you > express that this highway=residential has no sidewalks? How would you > express that a is higher than b that is higher than c? I'm aware that > level=* is used when things cross, that doesn't seem to be the case. > > Cheers, > > -- > Arlindo Saraiva Pereira Jr. > > Bacharelando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIRIO - uniriotec.br > Consultor de Software Livre da Uniriotec Consultoria - uniriotec.com > > Acadêmico: arlindo.pere...@uniriotec.br > Profissional: arlindo.pere...@uniriotec.com > Geral: cont...@arlindopereira.com > Tel.: +5521 92504072 > Jabber/Google Talk: nig...@nighto.net > Skype: nighto_sumomo > Chave pública: BD065DEC > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Residential road on a hill
Hi there, there's a residential road on a hill near my house (this one: http://osm.org/go/OVc0itC2c- ) that doesn't go from bottom to the top of it, but runs in a longitudinal way. The thing it that it's sidewalks are not in the same level. It's more or less like this: ___ |___ |___ a b c Where b is the road itself and a and c are it's sidewalks. Those | (the height difference from the road itself and the sidewalks) vary from 1 to 4 meters aproximately. Every 20 meter or so, there are some steps so that people can go from a or c to b and cross the street. How would you map this? Three lines, highway=residential and highway=footway (or pedestrian?) with it's steps? If so, how would you express that this highway=residential has no sidewalks? How would you express that a is higher than b that is higher than c? I'm aware that level=* is used when things cross, that doesn't seem to be the case. Cheers, -- Arlindo Saraiva Pereira Jr. Bacharelando em Sistemas de Informação - UNIRIO - uniriotec.br Consultor de Software Livre da Uniriotec Consultoria - uniriotec.com Acadêmico: arlindo.pere...@uniriotec.br Profissional: arlindo.pere...@uniriotec.com Geral: cont...@arlindopereira.com Tel.: +5521 92504072 Jabber/Google Talk: nig...@nighto.net Skype: nighto_sumomo Chave pública: BD065DEC ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
