Re: [OSM-talk] Spam in the diaries

2010-01-14 Thread Tom Hughes
On 14/01/10 17:58, Lars Francke wrote:

> What I'm wondering is why there are no rel="nofollow" attributes on
> the links. The last time diary spam was reported it was implemented
> for all user-provided content and as far as I can see it is still in
> the code. Perhaps something about the order of sanitize and linkify?
> But I really have no good idea.

Because those links came from the user - ie they entered  tags 
directly. It's only links that we generate (by spotting URLs in the 
text) that get the rel=nofollow treatment.

Tom

-- 
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://www.compton.nu/

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


Re: [OSM-talk] Spam in the diaries

2010-01-14 Thread Lars Francke
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 18:41, Jean-Marc Liotier  wrote:
> See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dbadwal/diary/9248
>
> What is the procedure to flag that and its author for removal ?

The author seems to have been removed already.

What I'm wondering is why there are no rel="nofollow" attributes on
the links. The last time diary spam was reported it was implemented
for all user-provided content and as far as I can see it is still in
the code. Perhaps something about the order of sanitize and linkify?
But I really have no good idea.

Lars

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk


[OSM-talk] Spam in the diaries

2010-01-14 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dbadwal/diary/9248

What is the procedure to flag that and its author for removal ?

___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk