[OSM-talk] Suggestions welcome | Re: Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2
On 02.08.20 01:03, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: Sorry if this sounds harsh, but I think using any funds at all to continue support for a tool that 1% of editors use would be wasteful. Flash is, for all intents and purposes, a dead technology. This money is better spent on other uses. What would you suggest? Serious question. We're suggesting spending €2,500 on this. Where else do you suggest spending €2,500 on? Rory ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestions welcome | Re: Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2
In the absence of other proposals, even splitting it among the other two would be a much better use, in my opinion. -- Skyler On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, at 13:27, Rory McCann wrote: > On 02.08.20 01:03, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: > > Sorry if this sounds harsh, but I think using any funds at all to > > continue support for a tool that 1% of editors use would be wasteful. > > Flash is, for all intents and purposes, a dead technology. This money is > > better spent on other uses. > > What would you suggest? > > Serious question. We're suggesting spending €2,500 on this. Where else > do you suggest spending €2,500 on? > > Rory > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestions welcome | Re: Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2
I agree. Skyler Hawthorne skrev: (2 augusti 2020 19:30:09 CEST) >In the absence of other proposals, even splitting it among the other >two would be a much better use, in my opinion. > >-- >Skyler > > >On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, at 13:27, Rory McCann wrote: >> On 02.08.20 01:03, Skyler Hawthorne wrote: >> > Sorry if this sounds harsh, but I think using any funds at all to >> > continue support for a tool that 1% of editors use would be >wasteful. >> > Flash is, for all intents and purposes, a dead technology. This >money is >> > better spent on other uses. >> >> What would you suggest? >> >> Serious question. We're suggesting spending €2,500 on this. Where >else >> do you suggest spending €2,500 on? >> >> Rory >> ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Suggestions welcome | Re: Funding of three infrastructure projects : Nominatim, osm2pgsql, Potlatch 2
> In the absence of other proposals, even splitting it among the other two > would be a much better use, in my opinion. Chrm. iD gets the pile of money and the MAIN OpenStreetMap editor - JOSM - gets NOTHING? Or does this show that iD is so broken/unwanted that nobody wants to work on it without getting paid a lot? -- Tomas ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
