Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Ed Loach wrote: When editing, Potlatch no longer shows what relations an existing way is part of. I'm assuming this isn't deliberate. Still trying to track this one down. It works 100% as intended on my local test setup, with the latest svn code and the latest Potlatch (though still running MySQL rather than Postgres). The bug only appears on the live site. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/We%27re-back-tp23152499p23171307.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login
A sudden upset stomach caused some delay, but the forum login is working again. Lambertus wrote: marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Yes, apparently the user details API call has changed enough to break the forum authentication for now. I'm working on it. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[talk-ph] Fwd: [OSM-talk] We're back
-- Forwarded message -- From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:43 PM Subject: [OSM-talk] We're back To: t...@openstreetmap.org ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Mad props (as the kids say) to Tom, Grant, Matt et al for getting it done. Buy them a beer: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6/Beer cheers Richard ___ talk mailing list t...@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- cheers, maning -- Freedom is still the most radical idea of all -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ -- ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
[OSM-talk] We're back
...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Mad props (as the kids say) to Tom, Grant, Matt et al for getting it done. Buy them a beer: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6/Beer cheers Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Congratulations! Excellent work. I will start uploading my backlog of edits shortly... Does this mean you can now set up Postgres on your PC, load a planet file, and get the same database layout as the main server? -- Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
On 21 Apr 2009, at 11:18, Ed Avis wrote: Does this mean you can now set up Postgres on your PC, load a planet file, and get the same database layout as the main server? Yes, though it is still a different database layout compared to that used by Mapnik. For the time being you can use both MySQL and Postgres using the same source. Shaun ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login
marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Yes, apparently the user details API call has changed enough to break the forum authentication for now. I'm working on it. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Just great ! Big thanks to the sysadmin team. A small note : the changesets page says Recently closed changesets: but we can see: (still editing) in the Saved at column. still editing means that it is not yet closed, isn't ? Another short question : empty changesets are possible ? (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/876923) (I tried to download the xml but no response - I guess it is the server current load). Pieren ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The deltas in http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute aren't being updated at the moment - what's the plan for these (I notice that the test06 directory has more up to date deltas, but these have stopped now too)? I assume the deltas for the new API are different (so will need a osm2pgsql upgrade) - are they going to be served from the same URI, or is the API version number going to be included in the URI so that people don't end up with 0.6 deltas when they were expecting 0.5? The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets The changeset stuff looks really good, and I note the welcome addition of a comment field. Is there any way of getting an RSS feed (or similar) of recent changesets and their comments within a specific bounding box? That'd be really good to get an at-a-glance idea of what the latest changes in your area are all about. - Steve xmpp:st...@nexusuk.org sip:st...@nexusuk.org http://www.nexusuk.org/ Servatis a periculum, servatis a maleficum - Whisper, Evanescence ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Pieren wrote: Another short question : empty changesets are possible ? (e.g. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/876923) (I tried to download the xml but no response - I guess it is the server current load). Indeed, there's no prohibition on empty changesets. Specifically, Potlatch at present creates a new changeset when you open it, so if you don't actually make any edits then an empty changeset will result. I'd like to fix this so it only creates a changeset on your first edit, but it's not critical. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/We%27re-back-tp23152499p23154119.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Great. Congratulations to all involved. You pulled a massive, great job. Potlatch seems to be stuck for me at 'Loading Presets'. It does say 0.11. Firefox and Chrome on windows. Is this load-related or something else altogether? martijn van exel -+- mve...@gmail.com -+- http://www.schaaltreinen.nl/ On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:43, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.netwrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Mad props (as the kids say) to Tom, Grant, Matt et al for getting it done. Buy them a beer: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6/Beer cheers Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
On 21 Apr 2009, at 12:27, Steve Hill wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The deltas in http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute aren't being updated at the moment - what's the plan for these (I notice that the test06 directory has more up to date deltas, but these have stopped now too)? The minute diffs are currently down until Brett updates Osmois on dev. I assume the deltas for the new API are different (so will need a osm2pgsql upgrade) - are they going to be served from the same URI, or is the API version number going to be included in the URI so that people don't end up with 0.6 deltas when they were expecting 0.5? osm2pgsql should be able to cope with the new 0.6 deltas, as there is only the addition of the version and changeset tags. The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets The changeset stuff looks really good, and I note the welcome addition of a comment field. Is there any way of getting an RSS feed (or similar) of recent changesets and their comments within a specific bounding box? That'd be really good to get an at-a-glance idea of what the latest changes in your area are all about. There is no RSS feed yet, that won't get implement for at least a week or two until the current load and bugs have settled out. Shaun ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login
Login in the forum still seems to be broken. Getting 400 Bad Request on login. Marcus ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Shaun McDonald wrote: On 21 Apr 2009, at 12:27, Steve Hill wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Richard Fairhurst wrote: ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The deltas in http://planet.openstreetmap.org/minute aren't being updated at the moment - what's the plan for these (I notice that the test06 directory has more up to date deltas, but these have stopped now too)? The minute diffs are currently down until Brett updates Osmois on dev. I'm on the train. Give me an hour or so ... ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Richard wrote: Specifically, Potlatch at present creates a new changeset when you open it, so if you don't actually make any edits then an empty changeset will result. Talking of Potlatch, should I open a trac ticket for the following? An example way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/13674690 The issue: When editing, Potlatch no longer shows what relations an existing way is part of. I'm assuming this isn't deliberate. Ed ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Steve Hill st...@nexusuk.org wrote: The changeset stuff looks really good, and I note the welcome addition of a comment field. Is there any way of getting an RSS feed (or similar) of recent changesets and their comments within a specific bounding box? That'd be really good to get an at-a-glance idea of what the latest changes in your area are all about. Future work, please file a trac ticket (although I'm not sure you're the first to ask :-) ) Cheers, Andy ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Martijn van Exel wrote: Great. Congratulations to all involved. You pulled a massive, great job. Potlatch seems to be stuck for me at 'Loading Presets'. It does say 0.11. Firefox and Chrome on windows. Is this load-related or something else altogether? Load-related. I know of two issues with Potlatch 0.11 at the moment. One is relation handling (actually I see Ed's just posted about that) - not clear yet whether this is Potlatch-specific. The other is that there seems to be some issue with junction nodes which is causing a server error dialogue to come up, haven't narrowed this one down yet. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/We%27re-back-tp23152499p23155833.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Richard wrote: I know of two issues with Potlatch 0.11 at the moment. One is relation handling (actually I see Ed's just posted about that) - not clear yet whether this is Potlatch-specific. JOSM showed the relation that the way was part of, but there seems to be a different relation issue affecting at least JOSM recently mentioned on dev where amending one relation tag key's value updated all the relation keys to have the same value, though are still correct in history. http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/115694 http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/115694/history Although looking at the history it only lists the tags for the first changeset and not the later ones. I'm assuming that isn’t by design either. Ed ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
-Original Message- From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Ed Loach Sent: 21 April 2009 14:28 To: 'Richard Fairhurst'; talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] We're back Richard wrote: I know of two issues with Potlatch 0.11 at the moment. One is relation handling (actually I see Ed's just posted about that) - not clear yet whether this is Potlatch-specific. JOSM showed the relation that the way was part of, but there seems to be a different relation issue affecting at least JOSM recently mentioned on dev where amending one relation tag key's value updated all the relation keys to have the same value, though are still correct in history. http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/115694 http://api.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/relation/115694/history Although looking at the history it only lists the tags for the first changeset and not the later ones. I'm assuming that isn't by design either. Almost. The tag values shown in the non-history version of the call are only from the first version, which was what I was attempting to fix the value for (I meant to type National cycle Network National Route 43, not ...4). I've shown that the issue also happens with JOSM 1529 (the one currently considered stable). I suspect that it's API rather than JOSM related and am currently scanning the Ruby code (and attempting to learn Ruby at the same time...). Can't find where tag.save is implemented at the moment though... Gregory ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
On 21 Apr 2009, at 18:32, Nop wrote: Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? This problem was found and sorted in the past few hours. Can you please check again, and if you still have a problem supply your username? Shaun ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
check again and report. / Grant Nop wrote: Hi! I noted that in the OSM inbox, all old messages are truncated to about the same length. I guess this is a result of transferring them. Are there any plans to restore them? bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
2009/4/21 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk: The tag values shown in the non-history version of the call are only from the first version, which was what I was attempting to fix the value for (I meant to type National cycle Network National Route 43, not ...4). Hm, I see something different, route in all tags values. But assuming the timestamp in the db is correct that might come from another of your edits after your post. Rolf ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Grant Slater schrieb: check again and report. Appears to be fixed. bye Nop ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
Goodie goodie - now we can all learn German Ausgezeichnet - jetzt können wir alle die schöne deutschen Sprache lernen (:) And hearty congratulations to the hard-working team ... Mike Harris -Original Message- From: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net] Sent: 21 April 2009 10:44 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] We're back ...with API 0.6, Postgres and the new server. But everyone's uploading at once, so don't expect to do much serious editing for the time being. :) The new changeset stuff is really superb. Have a browse: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changesets Mad props (as the kids say) to Tom, Grant, Matt et al for getting it done. Buy them a beer: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6/Beer cheers Richard ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] We're back
-Original Message- From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Rolf Bode-Meyer Sent: 21 April 2009 19:09 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] We're back 2009/4/21 Gregory Williams gregory.willi...@purplegeodesoftware.co.uk: The tag values shown in the non-history version of the call are only from the first version, which was what I was attempting to fix the value for (I meant to type National cycle Network National Route 43, not ...4). Hm, I see something different, route in all tags values. But assuming the timestamp in the db is correct that might come from another of your edits after your post. That's only because I've made further modifications to the relation since my earlier posting, when trying various things. I see all route now instead as well. Gregory ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
