Re: [OSM-talk] fake mapping
i found source-date, but if i can not on the ground verifies i do not think i should change, they did not like non gofers waking around. >Tuesday, June 9, 2020 5:14 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk >: > > > > >Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org: >>just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by >>public transportation. >> >>the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam, >>which was not there in 1969 >> >>when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all >>marked unmaintained track road. >> >>there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole >>property, where natural woods >> >>that have separate pologons. >> >>the point is there is to much there to fix. >Yes, in many cases map should be updated. If aerial images are wrong it is >useful to add >something like >note=edited based on survey, as of 2020 Bing aerial imagery is outdated and >wrong > >___ >talk mailing list >talk@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] fake mapping
> it is useful to add something like > note=edited based on survey or survey:date= in the hope than one day, editor 'll warn a mapper if his source is older than the previous one. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] fake mapping
And there is no need to be comprehensive. Map it as you you, little by little. On Tue, Jun 9, 2020, 12:15 Mateusz Konieczny via talk < talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > > just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours > by public transportation. > > the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the > dam, which was not there in 1969 > > when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were > all marked unmaintained track road. > > there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole > property, where natural woods > > that have separate pologons. > > the point is there is to much there to fix. > > Yes, in many cases map should be updated. If aerial images are wrong it is > useful to add > something like > note=edited based on survey, as of 2020 Bing aerial imagery is outdated > and wrong > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] fake mapping
Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org: > just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by > public transportation. > > the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam, > which was not there in 1969 > > when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all > marked unmaintained track road. > > there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole > property, where natural woods > > that have separate pologons. > > the point is there is to much there to fix. > Yes, in many cases map should be updated. If aerial images are wrong it is useful to add something like note=edited based on survey, as of 2020 Bing aerial imagery is outdated and wrong ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] fake mapping
On 9/6/20 8:26 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote: just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by public transportation. the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam, which was not there in 1969 when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all marked unmaintained track road. there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole property, where natural woods that have separate pologons. the point is there is to much there to fix. So? What is the purpose of this message? Satellite imagery can be out of date. So? Map the new data and put a source statement that says the satellite is out of date and what source you used (note cooyright rules!). There is no need to raise this on the list. Get on with the mapping. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] fake mapping
just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by public transportation. the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam, which was not there in 1969 when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all marked unmaintained track road. there are pologons around the greens, holes and fairways not the whole property, where natural woods that have separate pologons. the point is there is to much there to fix. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
