Re: [OSM-talk] minor stats
Joseph Jon Booker wrote: > Just wondering, how much of that is potlatch creating a new > changeset when you click the 'edit' tab without changing > anything? (or has that bug been fixed?) Since Potlatch 1.0, changesets are started: - in "edit with save": when you first save your changes - in "edit live": immediately you select this mode There's no bug - the "edit live" behaviour was in pretty much the original spec for changesets (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php?title=OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6&oldid=98075). cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/minor-stats-tp24055529p24074051.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] minor stats
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Simone Cortesi wrote: > hi, > > just a minor stats: > > it took us 4 years: from april 2005 to go from changeset 1 to > 1.000.000 in april 2009. > > We are now, after only 2 months, already at changeset 1.500.000 > I think that this is skewed by the fact that people are closing their changesets more often than just letting them time out. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] minor stats
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:52 PM, SteveC wrote: > Isn't that skewed by what the import process to 0.6 defined as a > changeset? yes. e.g: JOSM uses a changeset for each upload, but the changeset synthesis procedure created one for each "continuous session" without gaps of more than an hour. also there are no empty changesets pre-0.6. cheers, matt ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] minor stats
Isn't that skewed by what the import process to 0.6 defined as a changeset? On 16 Jun 2009, at 07:24, Simone Cortesi wrote: > hi, > > just a minor stats: > > it took us 4 years: from april 2005 to go from changeset 1 to > 1.000.000 in april 2009. > > We are now, after only 2 months, already at changeset 1.500.000 > > who... > > -S > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > Best Steve ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] minor stats
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:24:19 +0200 Simone Cortesi wrote: > hi, > > just a minor stats: > > it took us 4 years: from april 2005 to go from changeset 1 to > 1.000.000 in april 2009. > > We are now, after only 2 months, already at changeset 1.500.000 > > who... > > -S Just wondering, how much of that is potlatch creating a new changeset when you click the 'edit' tab without changing anything? (or has that bug been fixed?) -- Joseph Booker signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] minor stats
hi, just a minor stats: it took us 4 years: from april 2005 to go from changeset 1 to 1.000.000 in april 2009. We are now, after only 2 months, already at changeset 1.500.000 who... -S ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
